| 1. |
- Akaberi, Dario, 1989-, et al.
(author)
-
Mitigation of the replication of SARS-CoV-2 by nitric oxide in vitro
- 2020
-
In: Redox Biology. - : Elsevier. - 2213-2317. ; 37
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a global public health emergency posing a high burden on nations' health care systems and economies. Despite the great effort put in the development of vaccines and specific treatments, no prophylaxis or effective therapeutics are currently available. Nitric oxide (NO) is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial and a potent vasodilator that has proved to be effective in reducing SARS-CoV replication and hypoxia in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Given the potential of NO as treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection, we have evaluated the in vitro antiviral effect of NO on SARS-CoV-2 replication. The NO-donor S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) had a dose dependent inhibitory effect on SARS-CoV-2 replication, while the non S-nitrosated NAP was not active, as expected. Although the viral replication was not completely abolished (at 200 μM and 400 μM), SNAP delayed or completely prevented the development of viral cytopathic effect in treated cells, and the observed protective effect correlated with the level of inhibition of the viral replication. The capacity of the NO released from SNAP to covalently bind and inhibit SARS-CoV-2 3CL recombinant protease in vitro was also tested. The observed reduction in SARS-CoV-2 protease activity was consistent with S-nitrosation of the enzyme active site cysteine.
|
|
| 2. |
- Hoffman, Tove, et al.
(author)
-
Evaluation of a COVID-19 IgM and IgG rapid test; an efficient tool for 4 assessment of past exposure to SARS-CoV-2
- 2020
-
In: Infection Ecology & Epidemiology. - : Taylor & Francis. - 2000-8686. ; 10:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- COVID-19 is the most rapidly growing pandemic in modern time, and the need for 21 serological testing is most urgent. Although the diagnostics of acute patients by RT-PCR is 22 both efficient and specific, we are also crucially in need of serological tools for investigating 23 antibody responses and assessing individual and potential herd immunity. We evaluated a 24 commercially available test developed for rapid (within 15 minutes) detection of SARS-CoV-25 2-specific IgM and IgG by 29 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases and 124 negative controls. 26 The results revealed a sensitivity of 69.0 % and 93.1 % for IgM and IgG, respectively, based 27 solely on PCR-positivity due to the absence of a serological gold standard. The assay 28 specificities were shown to be 100 % for IgM and 99.2 % for IgG. This indicates that the test 29 is suitable for assessing previous virus exposure, although negative results may be unreliable 30 during the first weeks after infection. More detailed studies on antibody responses during and 31 post infection are urgently needed.
|
|
| 3. |
- Nissen, Karolina, et al.
(author)
-
Long-distance airborne dispersal of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 wards
- 2020
-
In: Scientific Reports. - : NATURE RESEARCH. - 2045-2322. ; 10:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2, as well as other coronaviruses, can be dispersed and potentially transmitted by aerosols directly or via ventilation systems. We therefore investigated ventilation openings in one COVID-19 ward and central ducts that expel indoor air from three COVID-19 wards at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, during April and May 2020. Swab samples were taken from individual ceiling ventilation openings and surfaces in central ducts. Samples were subsequently subjected to rRT-PCR targeting the N and E genes of SARS-CoV-2. Central ventilation HEPA filters, located several stories above the wards, were removed and portions analyzed in the same manner. In two subsequent samplings, SARS-CoV-2 N and E genes were detected in seven and four out of 19 room vents, respectively. Central ventilation HEPA exhaust filters from the ward were found positive for both genes in three samples. Corresponding filters from two other, adjacent COVID-19 wards were also found positive. Infective ability of the samples was assessed by inoculation of susceptible cell cultures but could not be determined in these experiments. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in central ventilation systems, distant from patient areas, indicate that virus can be transported long distances and that droplet transmission alone cannot reasonably explain this, especially considering the relatively low air change rates in these wards. Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 must be taken into consideration for preventive measures.
|
|
