| 1. |
- Edholm, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Abandoning resectional intent in patients initially deemed suitable for esophagectomy : a nationwide study of risk factors and outcomes
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Diseases of the esophagus. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1120-8694 .- 1442-2050. ; 34:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The main curative treatment modality for esophageal cancer is resection. Patients initially deemed suitable for resection may become unsuitable, most commonly due to signs of generalized disease or having become unfit for surgery. The aim was to assess risk factors for abandoning esophagectomy and its impact on survival. All patients diagnosed with an esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer in the Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer from 2006-2016 were included and risk factors associated with becoming ineligible for resection were analyzed in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Overall survival was explored by multivariable Cox regression models. Among 1,792 patients planned for resection, 189 (11%) became unsuitable for resection before surgery and 114 (6%) had exploratory surgery without resection. Intermediate and high educational levels were associated with an increased probability of resection (odds ratio (OR) 1.46, 95% CI 1.05-2.05, OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.28-2.87, respectively) as was marital status (married: OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01-1.85). Clinically advanced disease (cT4: OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.87; cN3: OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.81) and neoadjuvant treatment were associated with a decreased probability of resection (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.88).Five-year survival for non-resected patients was only 4.5% although neoadjuvant treatment was associated with improved survival (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56-0.99). Non-resected patients with squamous cell carcinoma had comparatively reduced survival (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.10-2.43). High socioeconomic status was associated with an increased probability of completing the plan to resect whereas clinically advanced disease and neoadjuvant treatment were independent factors associated with increased risk of abandoning resectional intent.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Hayami, Masaru, et al.
(författare)
-
Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry : Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgical Oncology. - : Springer Nature. - 1068-9265 .- 1534-4681. ; 29:9, s. 5609-5621
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Recent research indicates long-term survival benefits of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared with open esophagectomy (OE) for patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers, but there is a need for more population-based studies. Methods We conducted a prospective population-based nationwide cohort study including all patients in Sweden diagnosed with esophageal or junctional cancer who underwent a transthoracic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis. Data were collected from the Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer in 2006-2019. Patients were grouped into OE and MIE including hybrid MIE (HMIE) and totally MIE (TMIE). Overall survival and short-term postoperative outcomes were compared using Cox regression and logistic regression models, respectively. All models were adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, clinical T and N stage, neoadjuvant therapy, year of surgery, and hospital volume. Results Among 1404 patients, 998 (71.1%) underwent OE and 406 (28.9%) underwent MIE. Compared with OE, overall survival was better following MIE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.94), TMIE (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.94), and possibly also after HMIE (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56-1.02). MIE was associated with shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, higher number of resected lymph nodes, and shorter hospital stay compared with OE. MIE was also associated with fewer overall complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.47-1.03) as well as non-surgical complications (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.40-1.00). Conclusions MIE seems to offer better survival and similar or improved short-term postoperative outcomes in esophageal and GEJ cancers compared with OE in this unselected population-based cohort.
|
|
| 4. |
- Hedberg, Jakob, 1972-, et al.
(författare)
-
Peri-anastomotic microdialysis lactate assessment after esophagectomy
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Esophagus. - : Springer. - 1612-9059 .- 1612-9067. ; 18:4, s. 783-789
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Esophagectomy is the cornerstone in curative treatment for esophageal and gastroesophageal junctional cancer. Esophageal resection is an advanced procedure with many complications, whereof anastomotic leak is the most dreaded. This study aimed to monitor the microcirculation with microdialysis analysis of local lactate levels in real-time on both sides of the esophagogastric anastomosis in totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Materials and Methods Twenty-five patients planned for esophageal resection with gastric conduit reconstruction and intrathoracic anastomosis were recruited. A sampling device, the OnZurf(R) Probe, along with the CliniSenz(R) Analyser (Senzime AB, Uppsala Sweden) was utilized for measurements. Lactate levels from both sides of the anastomosis were analysed in real time, on site, by a transportable analyser device. Measurements were made every 30 min during the first 24 h, and thereafter every 2 hours for up to 4 days. Results All probes could be positioned as planned and on the third postoperative day 19/25 and 15/25 of the esophageal and gastric probes, respectively, continued to deliver measurements. In total, 89.6% (1539/1718) and 72.4% (1098/1516) of the measurements were deemed successful. The average lactate level on the esophageal side of the anastomosis and the gastric conduit ranged between 1.1-11.5 and 0.8-7.0 mM, respectively. Two anastomotic leaks occurred, one of which had persisting high lactate levels on the gastric side of the anastomosis. Conclusion Application and use of the novel CliniSenz(R) analyser system, in combination with the OnZurf(R) Probe was feasible and safe. Continuous monitoring of analytes from the perianastomotic area has the potential to improve care after esophageal resection.
|
|
| 5. |
- Jeremiasen, Martin, et al.
(författare)
-
Improvements in esophageal and gastric cancer care in Sweden-population-based results 2007-2016 from a national quality register
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Diseases of the esophagus. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1120-8694 .- 1442-2050. ; 33:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric cancer was launched in 2006 and contains data with adequate national coverage and of high internal validity on patients diagnosed with these tumors. The aim of this study was to describe the evolution of esophageal and gastric cancer care as reflected in a population-based clinical registry. The study population was 12,242 patients (6,926 with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers and 5,316 with gastric cancers) diagnosed between 2007 and 2016. Treatment strategies, short- and long-term mortality, gender aspects, and centralization were investigated. Neoadjuvant oncological treatment became increasingly prevalent during the study period. Resection rates for both esophageal/GEJ and gastric cancers decreased from 29.4% to 26.0% (P=0.022) and from 38.8% to 33.3% (P=0.002), respectively. A marked reduction in the number of hospitals performing esophageal and gastric cancer surgery was noted. In gastric cancer patients, an improvement in 30-day mortality from 4.2% to 1.6% (P=0.005) was evident. Overall 5-year survival after esophageal resection was 38.9%, being higher among women compared to men (47.5 vs. 36.6%; P<0.001), whereas no gender difference was seen in gastric cancer. During the recent decade, the analyses based on the Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric cancer database demonstrated significant improvements in several important quality indicators of care for patients with esophagogastric cancers. The Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric cancer offers an instrument not only for the control and endorsement of quality of care but also a unique tool for population-based clinical research.
|
|
| 6. |
- Jestin, Christine, et al.
(författare)
-
Geographical differences in cancer treatment and survival for patients with oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancers.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 107:11, s. 1500-1509
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Only around one-quarter of patients with cancer of the oesophagus and the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) undergo surgical resection. This population-based study investigated the rates of treatment with curative intent and resection, and their association with survival.METHODS: Patients diagnosed with oesophageal and GOJ cancer between 2006 and 2015 in Sweden were identified from the National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer (NREV). The NREV was cross-linked with several national registries to obtain information on additional exposures. The annual proportion of patients undergoing treatment with curative intent and surgical resection in each county was calculated, and the counties divided into groups with low, intermediate and high rates. Treatment with curative intent was defined as definitive chemoradiation therapy or surgery, with or without neoadjuvant oncological treatment. Overall survival was analysed using a multilevel model based on county of residence at the time of diagnosis.RESULTS: Some 5959 patients were included, of whom 1503 (25·2 per cent) underwent surgery. Median overall survival after diagnosis was 7·7, 8·8 and 11·1 months respectively in counties with low, intermediate and high rates of treatment with curative intent. Corresponding survival times for the surgical resection groups were 7·4, 9·3 and 11·0 months. In the multivariable analysis, a higher rate of treatment with curative intent (time ratio 1·17, 95 per cent c.i. 1·05 to 1·30; P < 0·001) and a higher resection rate (time ratio 1·24, 1·12 to 1·37; P < 0·001) were associated with improved survival after adjustment for relevant confounders.CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed in counties with higher rates of treatment with curative intent and higher rates of surgery had better survival.
|
|
| 7. |
- Jestin Hannan, Christine, et al.
(författare)
-
Differences in multidisciplinary team assessment on esophageal cancer patients in Sweden : a multicentre study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Diseases of the esophagus. - : Oxford University Press. - 1120-8694 .- 1442-2050. ; 35:Suppl. 2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- There are differences in esophageal cancer care across different counties in Sweden. According to national guidelines, all patients should be offered equal care which should be administrated by regional multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs). The aim of the study was to investigate differences between the six regional MCCs in Sweden regarding clinical stageing and recommended treatment.Ten consecutive cases per participating center, 60 cases in total, were planned for inclusion. After anonymization the radiological investigations were presented, along with the original case-specific medical history, anew at the six regional MCCs. Estimation of clinical TNM and treatment allocation (curative, palliative or best supportive care) were compared between MCCs as well as with the original assessment. Interim analysis was performed in April 2022 when ten cases had been presented at five of the six regional MCCs.All available cases were assessed at five MCCs in addition to the previous original assessment (60 assessments). The mean age for the first ten cases was 74.8 years (SD ± 9.8 years). Eight out of ten cases were men. In estimations of T- and N-stage the MCCs agreed in only one out of ten cases. In half of the cases more than three different estimations of N-stage were made. For clinical M-stage there was exact agreement in three cases. In determination of recommended treatment, all five MCCs were in agreement on half of the cases.Preliminary data show striking differences, both in assessment of TNM as well as treatment recommendation at different MCCs. One patient, recommended curative treatment by one MCC could be allocated to palliative care by another. Inclusion is ongoing and further analysis of these differences are warranted to achieve more equal care for esophageal cancer patients in Sweden.
|
|
| 8. |
- Jestin Hannan, Christine
(författare)
-
Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junctional Cancer : Improving Patient selection, Treatment and Care
- 2023
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related death. Choice of surgical approach and individualized treatment is crucial. The aims of this thesis were to evaluate the introduction of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) regarding oncological results and postoperative complications. To investigate radiological differences in pulmonary complications between MIE and open technique by studying computed tomography (CT). To evaluate geographical differences in intention for curative treatment and their association to survival. As well as to further explore these differences by comparing assessments of tumor stage (TNM) and treatment recommendations in anonymized cases at regional multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCC).A comparison of 51 MIE (21 hybrid and 30 totally minimally invasive) and 65 open resections in 2007-2016, showed an increased lymph node yield in the MIE group, 18 (13–23) vs. 12 (8–16) median (IQR), p<0.001. The result was confirmed in a multivariate regression model (adjusted odds ratio 3.15 [1.11–8.98], p=0.03). Postoperative complications did not differ between the groups.When comparing CT after open esophagectomy (n=20) and MIE (n=20), no ipsilateral differences in the areas of atelectasis or pleural effusion were seen. Nor did the groups differ in the proportion of patients with clinically important atelectasis (dx: 30% vs. 25%, sin: 65% vs. 65%) or pleural effusion (dx: 15% vs. 15%, sin: 65% vs. 45%).A total of 5959 esophageal cancer patients, diagnosed 2006-2015 in Sweden, were identified from the National Register for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer (NREV). In a multivariable analysis, a higher rate of treatment with curative intent (time ratio 1.17 [1.05-1.30], p<0.001) and a higher resection rate (time ratio 1.24 [1.12-1.37], p<0.001) were associated with improved survival.Fifty anonymized esophageal cancer cases were distributed to five expert MCCs. In estimations of T-stage, the MCCs were in total agreement in eight of 50 cases (16%). For N-stage, total agreement was seen in 17 cases (34%) and for clinical M-stage in 34 cases (68%). The MCCs agreed on recommended treatment in 26/50 cases (52%). In conclusion, the introduction of MIE resulted in a larger lymph node yield, without increased risk for complications. No difference in postoperative pleural effusion and atelectasis was seen on computed tomography five days after open esophagectomy compared with MIE. Patients diagnosed in a county with a higher curative intention rate and a higher rate of surgery had better five-year survival and there are differences in assessment of esophageal cancer patients at different MCCs.
|
|
| 9. |
- Kung, C. H., et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of surgical resection rate on survival in gastric cancer : nationwide study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: BJS Open. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2474-9842. ; 5:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: There are marked geographical variations in the proportion of patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. This study investigated the impact of resection rate on survival. METHODS: All patients with potentially curable gastric cancer between 2006 and 2017 were identified from the Swedish National Register of Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer. The annual resection rate was calculated for each county per year. Resection rates in all counties for all years were grouped into tertiles and classified as low, intermediate or high. Survival was analysed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 3465 patients were diagnosed with potentially curable gastric cancer, and 1934 (55.8 per cent) were resected. Resection rates in the low (1261 patients), intermediate (1141) and high (1063) tertiles were 0-50.0, 50.1-62.5 and 62.6-100 per cent respectively. The multivariable Cox analysis revealed better survival for patients diagnosed in counties during years with an intermediate versus low resection rate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.90; P < 0.001) and high versus low resection rate (HR 0.80, 0.73 to 0.88; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This national register study showed large regional variation in resection rates for gastric cancer. A higher resection rate appeared to be beneficial with regard to overall survival for the entire population.
|
|
| 10. |
- Kvernby, Sofia, et al.
(författare)
-
Quantitative comparison of data-driven gating and external hardware gating for 18F-FDG PET-MRI in patients with esophageal tumors
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Hybrid Imaging. - : Springer Nature. - 2510-3636. ; 5:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundRespiratory motion during PET imaging reduces image quality. Data-driven gating (DDG) based on principal component analysis (PCA) can be used to identify respiratory signals. The use of DDG, without need for external devices, would greatly increase the feasibility of using respiratory gating in a routine clinical setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate data-driven gating in relation to external hardware gating and regular static image acquisition on PET-MRI data with respect to SUVmax and lesion volumes.MethodsSixteen patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal cancer (Siewert I and II) underwent a 6-min PET scan on a Signa PET-MRI system (GE Healthcare) 1.5-2 h after injection of 4 MBq/kg F-18-FDG. External hardware gating was done using a respiratory bellow device, and DDG was performed using MotionFree (GE Healthcare). The DDG raw data files and the external hardware-gating raw files were created on a Matlab-based toolbox from the whole 6-min scan LIST-file. For comparison, two 3-min static raw files were created for each patient. Images were reconstructed using TF-OSEM with resolution recovery with 2 iterations, 28 subsets, and 3-mm post filter. SUVmax and lesion volume were measured in all visible lesions, and noise level was measured in the liver. Paired t-test, linear regression, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis were used to investigate difference, correlation, and agreement between the methods.ResultsA total number of 30 lesions were included in the study. No significant differences between DDG and external hardware-gating SUVmax or lesion volumes were found, but the noise level was significantly reduced in the DDG images. Both DDG and external hardware gating demonstrated significantly higher SUVmax (9.4% for DDG, 10.3% for external hardware gating) and smaller lesion volume (- 5.4% for DDG, - 6.6% for external gating) in comparison with non-gated static images.ConclusionsData-driven gating with MotionFree for PET-MRI performed similar to external device gating for esophageal lesions with respect to SUVmax and lesion volume. Both gating methods significantly increased the SUVmax and reduced the lesion volume in comparison with non-gated static acquisition. DDG resulted in reduced image noise compared to external device gating and static images.
|
|
| 11. |
- Linder, Gustav, et al.
(författare)
-
Burden of in-hospital care in oesophageal cancer : national population-based study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: BJS Open. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2474-9842. ; 5:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Oesophageal cancer management requires extensive in-hospital care. This cohort study aimed to quantify in-hospital care for patients with oesophageal cancer in relation to intended treatment, and to analyse factors associated with risk of spending a large proportion of survival time in hospital. METHODS: All patients with oesophageal cancer in three nationwide registers over a 10-year period were included. In-hospital care during the first year after diagnosis was evaluated, and the proportion of survival time spent in hospital, stratified by intended treatment (curative, palliative or best supportive care), was calculated. Associations between relevant factors and a greater proportion of survival time in hospital were analysed by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: In-hospital care was provided for a median of 39, 26, and 15 days in the first year after diagnosis of oesophageal cancer in curative, palliative, and best supportive care groups respectively. Patients receiving curatively intended treatment spent a median of 12 per cent of their survival time in hospital during the first year after diagnosis, whereas those receiving palliative or best supportive care spent 19 and 23 per cent respectively. Factors associated with more in-hospital care included older age, female sex, being unmarried, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CONCLUSION: The burden of in-hospital care during the first year after diagnosis of oesophageal cancer was substantial. Important clinical and socioeconomic factors were identified that predisposed to a greater proportion of survival time spent in hospital.
|
|
| 12. |
- Linder, Gustav, et al.
(författare)
-
Safe Introduction of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy at a Medium Volume Center
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. - : Sage Publications. - 1457-4969 .- 1799-7267. ; 109:2, s. 121-126
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and Aims: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a favored alternative in high-volume centers. We evaluated the introduction of, and transition to, minimally invasive esophagectomy at a medium volume tertiary referral center (10-20 esophagectomies annually) with focus on surgical results. Material and Methods: Patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy or open transthoracic surgery for carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction (Siewert I and II) during 2007-2016 were retrospectively studied. Sorted on surgical approach, perioperative data, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed and multivariate regression models were used to adjust for possible confounders. Results: One hundred and sixteen patients were included, 51 minimally invasive esophagectomy (21 hybrid and 30 totally minimally invasive) and 65 open resections. The groups were well matched. However, higher body mass index, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and cervical anastomosis were more frequent in the minimally invasive esophagectomy group. Minimally invasive esophagectomy was associated with less peroperative bleeding (384 vs 607 mL, p = 0.036) and reduced length of stay (14 vs 15 days, p = 0.042). Duration of surgery, radical resection rate, and postoperative complications did not differ between groups. Lymph node yield was higher in the minimally invasive esophagectomy group, 18 (13-23) vs 12 (8-16), p < 0.001, confirmed in a multivariate regression model (adjusted odds ratio 3.15, 95% class interval 1.11-8.98, p = 0.032). Conclusion: The introduction of minimally invasive esophagectomy at a medium volume tertiary referral center resulted in superior lymph node yield, less peroperative blood loss and shorter length of stay, without compromising the rate of radical resection, or increasing the complication rate.
|
|
