| 1. |
- Peixoto, Anna, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
En kvalitativ intervjustudie av jämställdhet och normer vid naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Göteborgs universitet
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Jämställda fakulteter? En studie av arbetsfördelning och normer hos lärare och forskare vid två fakulteter vid Göteborgs universitet. - : Göteborgs universitet. - 9789173603720 ; , s. 54-104
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- I föreliggande studie närmar vi oss upplevelser av det dagliga arbetet, av arbetssituationen som sådan och av kollegiala relationer. Intervjustudien ligger till grund för en analys som visar på hierarkier och selektionsprocesser inom och mellan arbetsfält såsom forskning, undervisning och administration. Verksamheterna upplevs och beskrivs av grupper av anställda som djupt ojämställda.
|
|
| 2. |
- Peixoto, Anna, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
On Hierarchies and Interdependence in Academia
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Anna Peixoto & Anna-Karin Wyndhamn (2010) “On Hierarchies aSymposia: Gender and Career in Educational Research, NFPF 11-13 March 2010, Malmö Sweden.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This interview study of a Swedish Faculty of Education investigates the experience of the employees in an organisation with a distinct order of rank. In this faculty the full time researcher (usually a man) is perceived to be higher up in the hierarchy compared to the full time teacher (usually a woman). The feeling of being in a position of dependency to a superior and to owe that person loyalty is another theme expressed during the interviews. According to the informants any possible criticism concerning scientific agenda as well as the spoken and performed attitudes towards employees is silenced by the power relations. As a consequence, gender stereotypical expectations of male and female employees are reported to be left unquestioned during seminars, courses and other work meetings. We discuss how these power relations are given different meanings by the informants. The descriptions given by the PhD students constitute our main interest. We argue that these ranks of power will affect discussions concerning the work place as well as the production of science, and that these discussions entail strong restrictions for what and whom you may criticise. These restrictions may reproduce, rather than change, well known relations of power inside and outside Academia.
|
|
| 3. |
- Jordansson, Birgitta, 1952, et al.
(författare)
-
Doktorshattar i omvandling. Reformerad forskarutbildning i teori och praktik
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Resultatdialog 2011, Vetenskapsrådet Rapport 7:2011. - Stockholm : Vetenskapsrådet. - 9789173071994 ; , s. 65-70
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning av ett forskningsprojekt finansierat av Vetenskapsrådets utbildningsvetenskapliga kommitté. Texten fokuserar på projektets två huvudspår. Dels den politiska styrningen av forskarutbildningen sedan reformen 1998 och hur universitetet svarar upp mot, och tolkar uppdraget. Dels hur enskilda doktorander agerar och hur vardagen som doktorand ser ut. Det senare handlar i hög grad om att försöka lära sig spelets regler.
|
|
| 4. |
- Peixoto, Anna, 1979
(författare)
-
De mest lämpade – en studie av doktoranders habituering på det vetenskapliga fältet
- 2014
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This thesis is about the university as a workplace. Essentially, it addresses postgraduate studies, doctoral students’ work conditions, and how these students are schooled to become researchers. The overarching purpose of the thesis is, based on Sweden’s 1998 reform of research education, to study the parameters of PhD students’ working lives, their schooling as budding researchers in various subject areas, and their ways of handling the formal rules and tacit expectations of academia in relation to their own resources and assets. The theoretical framework for the thesis is Bourdieu’s theory of capital and fields. The primary empirical basis is 15 interviews with PhD students in three subject areas, humanities, natural sciences and educational sciences, at the University of Gothenburg. The analysis shows that the parameters of PhD students’ work are characterised both by subject-specific doxa and by the formal rules associated with research education and the doctoral students’ form of employment. The subject areas have diverging outlooks and basic assumptions regarding the aims and purpose of research education. The thesis also shows that politically initiated reforms are being interpreted and reshaped in relation to the values sustained by the scientific field itself. This generates a tension between different logics that are not always mutually compatible. The good intentions of the reform, to clarify research education, have thus rather created further grey areas between official edicts and informal demands. The doctoral students who can navigate among them successfully and, at the same time, stage their researcher role in the desired way, are the ones who are invited into the scientific field. It is they who are seen as the fittest.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
