| 1. |
- Carstam, Louise, et al.
(författare)
-
Socioeconomic factors affect treatment delivery for patients with low grade glioma : a Swedish population-based study
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Neuro-Oncology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0167-594X .- 1573-7373. ; 146:2, s. 329-337
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Despite aspirations to achieve equality in healthcare we know that socioeconomic differences exist and may affect treatment and patient outcome, also in serious diseases such as cancer. We investigated disparities in neurosurgical care and outcome for patients with low-grade glioma (LGG).METHODS: In this nationwide registry-based study, patients who had undergone surgery for LGG during 2005-2015 were identified (n = 547) through the Swedish Brain Tumor Registry. We linked data to multiple national registries with individual level data on income, education and comorbidity and analyzed the association of disease characteristics, surgical management and outcome, with levels of income, education and sex.RESULTS: Patients with either low income, low education or female gender showed worse pre-operative performance status. Patients with low income or education also had more comorbidities and those with low education endured longer waiting times for surgery. Median time from radiological imaging to surgery was 51 days (Q1-3 27-191) for patients with low education, compared to 32 days (Q1-3 20-80) for patients with high education (p = 0.006). Differences in waiting time over educational levels remained significant after stratification for age, comorbidity, preoperative performance status, and tumor size. Overall survival was better for patients with high income or high education, but income- and education-related survival differences were not significant after adjustment for age and comorbidity. The type of surgical procedure or complications did not differ over socioeconomic groups or sex.CONCLUSION: The neurosurgical care for LGG in Sweden, a society with universal healthcare, displays differences that can be related to socioeconomic factors.
|
|
| 2. |
- Rydén, Isabelle, et al.
(författare)
-
Return to work following diagnosis of low-grade glioma: A nationwide matched cohort study.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Neurology. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 1526-632X .- 0028-3878. ; 95:7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Return-to-work (RTW) following diagnosis of infiltrative low-grade gliomas (LGG) is unknown.Swedish patients with histopathological verified WHO grade II diffuse glioma diagnosed between 2005-2015 were included. Data were acquired from several Swedish registries. A total of 381 patients aged 18-60 were eligible. A matched control population (n=1900) was acquired. Individual data on sick leave, compensations, comorbidity and treatments assigned were assessed. Predictors were explored using multivariable logistic regression.One year before surgery/index date, 88 % of cases were working compared to 91 % of controls. The proportion of controls working remained constant, while patients had a rapid increase in sick leave approximately six months prior to surgery. After one and two years respectively, 52 % and 63 % of the patients were working. Predictors for no-RTW after one year were previous sick leave (OR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.88-0.96, p <0.001), older age (OR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.94-0.99, p=0.005) and lower functional level (OR 0.64 95% CI, 0.45-0.91 p=0.01). Patients receiving adjuvant treatment were less likely to RTW within the first year. At two years, biopsy (as opposed to resection), female sex and comorbidity were also unfavorable, while age and adjuvant treatment were no longer significant.Approximately half of the patients RTW within the first year. Lower functional status, previous sick leave, older age and adjuvant treatment were risk factors for no-RTW at one year after surgery. Female sex, comorbidity and biopsy only were also unfavorable for RTW at two years.
|
|
