| 1. |
- Nyman, Claes R, et al.
(författare)
-
The patient's choice of androgen-deprivation therapy in locally advanced prostate cancer : Bicalutamide, a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue or orchidectomy
- 2005
-
Ingår i: BJU International. - 1464-4096 .- 1464-410X. ; 96:7, s. 1014-1018
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To investigate patient preference for three established androgen-deprivation therapies for locally advanced prostate cancer, the patient's capacity to decide his therapy, the reasons for selecting a certain mode of therapy, and patient satisfaction with the chosen therapy 3 months after initiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 150 patients (mean age 75 years, range 57-89) with previously untreated locally advanced prostate cancer from 13 hospitals were consecutively given the chance to choose between the antiandrogenic oral drug bicalutamide, a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH) by injection, or surgical orchidectomy. After discussing the nature of their disease the patients took home written information about prostate cancer and the three different treatment options. After 1 week they were assessed using a questionnaire for biographical data, their attitude towards the different treatment alternatives and their choice of therapy. Three months later the patients completed a questionnaire about the treatment they had undergone. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (42%) chose bicalutamide, 51 (34%) the GnRH analogue and 36 (24%) orchidectomy, 87% of those choosing bicalutamide, 84% GnRH and 94% orchidectomy, respectively, were sure about their choice but 12%, 17% and 3% of the patients, respectively, had some difficulty in deciding. The most important reasons for the therapy chosen were avoidance of injections and surgery, and a lower risk of impotence (bicalutamide), negative attitude to surgery and tablets (GnRH), and avoidance of injections and tablets (orchidectomy). Almost all patients (98%, 98% and 97%, respectively) were satisfied with their choice after 3 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: There are three equally effective forms of androgen deprivation for locally advanced prostate cancer without known metastases. There are major differences among these treatments in the mode of application and the likelihood and impact of side-effects. When patients are fully informed and play an active role in the treatment decision they are satisfied with their decision 3 months later. © 2005 BJU International.
|
|
| 2. |
- Sandblom, Gabriel, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical and economic consequences of screening for prostate cancer - the Swedish approach
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Recent Research Developments in Cancer - årsbok. - Kerala, Indien : Transworld Research Network. - 8178951851 ; , s. 19-35
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The outcome of two large-scale randomized controlled studies on prostate cancer screening from Europe and the USA are expected within three years. Together with a third large trial already performed in Quebec, Canada, they will hopefully provide some form of evidence for or against screening within the near future, although the results of such studies must be interpreted with caution. The effectiveness of a screening programme depends on the cancer prevalence, demographics, socioeconomic conditions, and treatment traditions in the country where it is performed, which limits the external validity of such studies. The prevalence of prostate cancer is relatively high in Sweden, which theoretically would favour screening. Treatment with curative intent, however, is not as well established as in other countries, despite the fact that the only randomized controlled study published so far with sufficient power to show prolonged cancer-specific survival following radical prostatectomy was performed in Sweden. As watchful waiting is often favoured in Sweden, even for men with localized tumours, the benefit of early detection is reduced. The positive as well as negative economic consequences of prostate cancer screening also have to be considered before a screening programme is started. All these circumstances emphasize the fact that the decision to introduce a screening programme has to be taken at the national level. No study can provide an outcome that can be set as an international standard. Three large trials of prostate cancer screening have been performed in Sweden, but screening on a broad scale has not yet been recommended.
|
|
| 3. |
- Varenhorst, Eberhard, 1937-, et al.
(författare)
-
The National Prostate Cancer Register in Sweden 1998-2002 : trends in incidence, treatment and survival
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0036-5599 .- 1651-2065. ; 39:2, s. 117-123
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: To provide a descriptive review of the establishment of the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) in Sweden, to present clinical characteristics at diagnosis and to calculate the relative survival of different risk groups after 5 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 1998, data on all newly diagnosed prostate cancers, including TNM classification, grade of malignancy, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and treatment, have been prospectively collected. For the 35,223 patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2002, relative survival in different risk groups has been calculated. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2002, 96% of all prostate cancer cases diagnosed in Sweden were registered in the NPCR. The number of new cases increased from 6137 in 1998 to 7385 in 2002. The age-standardized rate rose in those aged < 70 years, while it was stable, or possibly declining from 1999, in the older age groups. The proportion of T1c tumours increased from 14% to 28% of all recorded cases. The age-adjusted incidence of advanced tumours (M1 or PSA > 100 ng/ml) decreased by 17%. The proportion of patients receiving curative treatment doubled. Patients with N1 or M1 disease or poorly differentiated tumours (G3 or Gleason score 8-10) had a markedly reduced relative 5-year survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to establish a nationwide prostate cancer register including basic data for assessment of the disease in the whole of Sweden. The introduction of PSA screening has increased the detection of early prostate cancer in younger men and, to a lesser extent, decreased the incidence of advanced disease. The effect of these changes on mortality is obscure but the NPCR in Sweden will serve as an important tool in such evaluation.
|
|
