1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
- Sjostrom, J, et al.
(författare)
-
C-erbB-2 expression does not predict response to docetaxel or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer
- 2002
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Cancer. - 1879-0852. ; 38:4, s. 535-542
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Breast cancer patients with c-erbB-2-positive tumours seem to benefit from anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The predictive value of c-erbB-2 for taxane sensitivity is not yet clear. The purpose of this study was to assess whether c-erbB-2 expression is associated with clinical sensitivity to docetaxel (T) or sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF). A total of 283 patients with metastatic breast cancer were initially enrolled in a randomised multicentre trial comparing docetaxel with sequential MF in advanced breast cancer. Paraffin-embedded blocks of the primary tumour were available for 131 patients (46%). c-erbB-2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry using a polyclonal antibody to the c-erbB-2 protein. C-erbB-2 expression was scored in a semi-quantitative fashion using a 0 to 3+ scale. Staining scores 2+ or greater were considered positive, Response evaluation was performed according to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. Overall 54 (42%) patients had c-erbB-2-positive tumours. There was no association between treatment outcome and c-erbB-2 overexpression. The overall response rates (RR) (n = 128) among c-erbB-2 -negative and -positive patients were 35 and 44%, respectively (P=0.359). In the MF arm (n = 62), the RR was somewhat higher in the c-erbB-.2 overexpressors (33% versus 18%, P = 0. 18). In the docetaxel arm the RRs were very similar, regardless of the c-erbB-2 expression (53% versus 53%). While several studies have suggested a prognostic and putative predictive significance of c-erbB-2 overexpression in early breast cancer, the significance of c-erbB-2 expression as a predictive factor for response to various cytotoxic treatments in advanced breast cancer is still controversial. In this study, c-erbB-2 expression could not predict response to either MF or T. Thus, tumours over-expressing c-erbB-2 are not uniformly more sensitive to taxanes and c-erbB-2 expression cannot yet be applied clinically as a predictive factor for response in advanced breast cancer.
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
- Sjostrom, J, et al.
(författare)
-
The predictive value of bcl-2, bax, bcl-xL, bag-1, fas, and fasL for chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Clinical Cancer Research. - 1078-0432. ; 8:3, s. 811-816
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: The purpose was to evaluate the utility of some bcl-2 family proteins fas and fasL as predictive indicators for chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer. Experimental Design: Between October 1994 and October 1997, 283 patients with advanced breast cancer were included in a multicenter randomized study comparing docetaxel (D) to sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (MF) after anthracycline failure. The response rates (complete response + partial response) were 42 and 21% in the D and MF arms, respectively (P < 0.001). In 126 patients, histological blocks of primary tumors were available for inummohistochemical analysis of bax, bcl-2, bcl-xL, bag-1, fas and fasL. Results: Of the investigated factors, bag-1 correlated positively with bax, bcl-2, and fasL, and fasL correlated positively with fas and bax. None of these apoptosis-related factors was associated with a response to chemotherapy either in the whole patient population or in the D or MF arms. Interestingly, low bcl-2 expression was associated with shorter time to progression (P = 0.02) and shorter overall survival (OS; P = 0.001). High fasL expression showed a trend toward shorter OS. In multivariate backwards stepwise Cox analysis, in which histological grade and estrogen receptor status (ER) were also included, bcl-2 (P = 0.01) and fasL (P = 0.005) remained highly significantly associated with OS, whereas histological grade and ER lost their significance. Conclusions: None of the investigated apoptosis-related factors of primary tumor could predict the later response to either D or MF treatment. However, fasL and bcl-2 were strong prognostic factors. Patients who had tumors with high fasL and low bcl-2 expression had the shortest OS.
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
- Tynninen, O, et al.
(författare)
-
Tumour microvessel density as predictor of chemotherapy response in breast cancer patients
- 2002
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1532-1827 .- 0007-0920. ; 86:12, s. 1905-1908
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of intratumoural microvessel density in breast cancer. We studied immunohistochemically primary tumours of 104 patients with metastasised breast cancer who took part in a randomised multicentre trial comparing docetaxel to sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. Vessels were highlighted with factor VIII staining and counted microscopically. Microvessel density was compared with clinical response to chemotherapy and patient survival. The microvessel density of the primary tumour was not significantly associated with patient's response to chemotherapy, time to progression or overall survival in the whole patient population or in the docetaxel or methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil groups. However, disease-free survival was longer in patients with low microvessel density (P=0.01). These findings suggest that microvessel density of the primary tumour cannot be used as a predictive marker for chemotherapy response in advanced breast cancer.
|
|
9. |
- Luoma, M. L., et al.
(författare)
-
Physical performance, toxicity, and quality of life as assessed by the physician and the patient
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Acta Oncol. - 0284-186X .- 1651-226X. ; 41:1, s. 44-9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to study the relationship between physician-assessed quality of life parameters, i.e., toxicity and physical performance, and patients' self-reports of their quality of life (QoL). QoL was assessed at baseline and before each treatment, using the EORTC QLQ-C30. The WHO performance score (PS) and toxicity were assessed in physician interviews. The correlations between the WHO PS and the QLQ-C30 functioning scale scores varied from weak to moderate, depending on the scale. Strongest associations were found in physical-, social-, and role functioning, and in the global QoL. The QLQ-C30 nausea/vomiting and diarrhea scales correlated moderately to corresponding WHO scores. A multiple linear regression analysis was used to analyze the contribution of WHO PS and toxicity variables to the global QoL. The best model explained only 16% of the variance of the global QoL score. The present findings highlight the importance of independent QoL assessments focused on those aspects of QoL not captured in clinical interviews with the physician.
|
|