| 1. |
- Haas, David W., et al.
(författare)
-
Pharmacogenetics of Between-Individual Variability in Plasma Clearance of Bedaquiline and Clofazimine in South Africa
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Infectious Diseases. - : Oxford University Press. - 0022-1899 .- 1537-6613. ; 226:1, s. 147-156
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In a cohort of patients treated for drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa, CYP3A5*3was associated with slower plasma bedaquiline clearance. Different CYP3A5*3minor allele frequencies among populations may help explain the more rapid bedaquiline clearance previously reported with African ancestry.Background Plasma bedaquiline clearance is reportedly more rapid with African ancestry. Our objective was to determine whether genetic polymorphisms explained between-individual variability in plasma clearance of bedaquiline, its M2 metabolite, and clofazimine in a cohort of patients treated for drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa.Methods Plasma clearance was estimated with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Associations between pharmacogenetic polymorphisms, genome-wide polymorphisms, and variability in clearance were examined using linear regression models.Results Of 195 cohort participants, 140 were evaluable for genetic associations. Among 21 polymorphisms selected based on prior genome-wide significant associations with any drug, rs776746 (CYP3A5*3) was associated with slower clearance of bedaquiline (P = .0017) but not M2 (P = .25). CYP3A5*3 heterozygosity and homozygosity were associated with 15% and 30% slower bedaquiline clearance, respectively. The lowest P value for clofazimine clearance was with VKORC1 rs9923231 (P = .13). In genome-wide analyses, the lowest P values for clearance of bedaquiline and clofazimine were with RFX4 rs76345012 (P = 6.4 x 10(-7)) and CNTN5 rs75285763 (P = 2.9 x 10(-8)), respectively.Conclusions Among South Africans treated for drug-resistant tuberculosis, CYP3A5*3 was associated with slower bedaquiline clearance. Different CYP3A5*3 frequencies among populations may help explain the more rapid bedaquiline clearance reported in Africans. Associations with RFX4 and CNTN5 are likely by chance alone.
|
|
| 2. |
- Koele, Simon E., et al.
(författare)
-
Optimized Loading Dose Strategies for Bedaquiline When Restarting Interrupted Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. - : American Society for Microbiology. - 0066-4804 .- 1098-6596. ; 66:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Interruption of treatment is common in drug-resistant tuberculosis patients. Bedaquiline has a long terminal half-life; therefore, restarting after an interruption without a loading dose could increase the risk of suboptimal treatment outcome and resistance development. Interruption of treatment is common in drug-resistant tuberculosis patients. Bedaquiline has a long terminal half-life; therefore, restarting after an interruption without a loading dose could increase the risk of suboptimal treatment outcome and resistance development. We aimed to identify the most suitable loading dose strategies for bedaquiline restart after an interruption. A model-based simulation study was performed. Pharmacokinetic profiles of bedaquiline and its metabolite M2 (associated with QT prolongation) were simulated for 5,000 virtual patients for different durations and starting points of treatment interruption. Weekly bedaquiline area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and M2 maximum concentration (C-max) deviation before interruption and after reloading were assessed to evaluate the efficacy and safety, respectively, of the reloading strategies. Bedaquiline weekly AUC and M2 C-max deviation were mainly driven by the duration of interruption and only marginally by the starting point of interruption. For interruptions with a duration shorter than 2 weeks, no new loading dose is needed. For interruptions with durations between 2 weeks and 1 month, 1 month and 1 year, and longer than 1 year, reloading periods of 3 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks, respectively, are recommended. This reloading strategy results in an average bedaquiline AUC deviation of 1.88% to 5.98% compared with -16.4% to -59.8% without reloading for interruptions of 2 weeks and 1 year, respectively, without increasing M2 C-max. This study presents easy-to-implement reloading strategies for restarting a patient on bedaquiline treatment after an interruption.
|
|
| 3. |
- van Beek, Stijn W., et al.
(författare)
-
Model-Predicted Impact of ECG Monitoring Strategies During Bedaquiline Treatment
- 2022
-
Ingår i: OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES. - : Oxford University Press. - 2328-8957. ; 9:8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The M2 metabolite of bedaquiline causes QT-interval prolongation, making electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring of patients receiving bedaquiline for drug-resistant tuberculosis necessary. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between M2 exposure and Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF)-interval prolongation and to explore suitable ECG monitoring strategies for 6-month bedaquiline treatment.Methods: Data from the PROBeX study, a prospective observational cohort study, were used to characterize the relationship between M2 exposure and QTcF. Established nonlinear mixed-effects models were fitted to pharmacokinetic and ECG data. In a virtual patient population, QTcF values were simulated for scenarios with and without concomitant clofazimine. ECG monitoring strategies to identify patients who need to interrupt treatment (QTcF > 500 ms) were explored.Results: One hundred seventy patients were included, providing 1131 bedaquiline/M2 plasma concentrations and 1702 QTcF measurements; 2.1% of virtual patients receiving concomitant clofazimine had QTcF > 500 ms at any point during treatment (0.7% without concomitant clofazimine). With monthly monitoring, almost all patients with QTcF > 500 ms were identified by week 12; after week 12, patients were predominantly falsely identified as QTcF > 500 ms due to stochastic measurement error. Following a strategy with monitoring before treatment and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in simulations with concomitant clofazimine, 93.8% of all patients who should interrupt treatment were identified, and 26.4% of all interruptions were unnecessary (92.1% and 32.2%, respectively, without concomitant clofazimine).Conclusions: Our simulations enable an informed decision for a suitable ECG monitoring strategy by weighing the risk of missing patients with QTcF > 500 ms and that of interrupting bedaquiline treatment unnecessarily. We propose ECG monitoring before treatment and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 after starting bedaquiline treatment.
|
|
