51. |
|
|
52. |
- Malmberg, Jonas, et al.
(författare)
-
Anställningsskydd, rörlighet och tillväxt
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Vägar till en öppnare arbetsmarknad. - Stockholm : Arbetslivsinstitutet. - 9170457743 ; , s. 151-158
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
53. |
- Malmberg, Jonas, 1962-, et al.
(författare)
-
Anställningsskydd, småföretag och tillväxt
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Arbetsrätt, rörlighet och tillväxt. - Östersund : Institutet för tillväxtpolitiska studier. ; , s. 113-138
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
54. |
|
|
55. |
|
|
56. |
|
|
57. |
|
|
58. |
|
|
59. |
- Malmberg, Jonas
(författare)
-
The Legal Position of Employees’ in Cross-Border Transfers of Undertakings in EU – A Question of Jurisdiction and Choice of Law
- 2006
-
Ingår i: International Journal for Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations. - New York : Aspen publishers. - 0952-617X. ; 22, s. 385-406
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The EC Transfer of Undertakings Directive (2001/23/EC) aims to protect the position of employees in the case of a transfer of undertaking. This paper discusses the way in which the Directive is to be applied to cross-border transfers of undertakings. The analysis indicates that, in principle, the Directive is applicable to such transfers. Since the Directive must be implemented under national law, this involves different national rules for transfers of undertakings, even if they are harmonised to some extent. As a result, one key issue concerns which country’s law is to apply and which country’s courts have jurisdiction to hear disputes arising from cross-border transfers.
|
|
60. |
- Malmberg, Jonas, et al.
(författare)
-
The Vaxholm case from a Swedish and European perspective
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Transfer. - Brussels : European Trade Union Institute. - 1024-2589. ; 12:2, s. 155-167
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Vaxholm (or Laval) case concerns an industrial action undertaken on a building site in Vaxholm, a town not far from Stockholm, Sweden. The work was performed by Latvian workers employed by a Latvian company. In order to put pressure on the company to conclude a collective agreement the Swedish Building workers’ union initiated industrial action, including a ban on all building and installation. This blockade was supported by the Electricians’ Union through a secondary action. Both the primary and the secondary actions were lawful under Swedish law. The case raises the question whether the industrial action or Swedish law is contrary to Community law on the free movement of services or the Posted Workers Directive. The case is now pending before the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The aim of this article is to present the background and context of the Vaxholm case for a non-Swedish audience and to outline the main issues of legal interpretation at stake, as well as their background in the Swedish industrial relations system and in Swedish and European law. The authors also point to some probable solutions in the light of earlier case-law of the ECJ.
|
|