| 61. |
- Galon, Jerome, et al.
(författare)
-
Towards the introduction of the 'Immunoscore' in the classification of malignant tumours
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Journal of Pathology. - : Wiley-Blackwell. - 0022-3417 .- 1096-9896. ; 232:2, s. 199-209
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- The American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (AJCC/UICC) TNM staging system provides the most reliable guidelines for the routine prognostication and treatment of colorectal carcinoma. This traditional tumour staging summarizes data on tumour burden (T), the presence of cancer cells in draining and regional lymph nodes (N) and evidence for distant metastases (M). However, it is now recognized that the clinical outcome can vary significantly among patients within the same stage. The current classification provides limited prognostic information and does not predict response to therapy. Multiple ways to classify cancer and to distinguish different subtypes of colorectal cancer have been proposed, including morphology, cell origin, molecular pathways, mutation status and gene expression-based stratification. These parameters rely on tumour-cell characteristics. Extensive literature has investigated the host immune response against cancer and demonstrated the prognostic impact of the in situ immune cell infiltrate in tumours. A methodology named Immunoscore' has been defined to quantify the in situ immune infiltrate. In colorectal cancer, the Immunoscore may add to the significance of the current AJCC/UICC TNM classification, since it has been demonstrated to be a prognostic factor superior to the AJCC/UICC TNM classification. An international consortium has been initiated to validate and promote the Immunoscore in routine clinical settings. The results of this international consortium may result in the implementation of the Immunoscore as a new component for the classification of cancer, designated TNM-I (TNM-Immune).
|
|
| 62. |
- Gao, Jingfang, 1966-
(författare)
-
Molecular and Biological Characteristics of Stroma and Tumor Cells in Colorectal Cancer
- 2008
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Carcinogenesis is a progressive process involving multiple genetic alterations in tumor cells and complex interactions in the tumor-host microenvironment. To better understand the contribution of molecular alterations in tumor cells and stromal variables to the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) and identify prognostic factors, in this study we examined the clinicopathological and biological significance of stromal variables, including particularly interesting new cysteine-histidine rich protein (PINCH), inflammatory infiltration, angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, as well as hRAD50/hMRE11/hNBS1 proteins and hRAD50 mutation in tumor cell in CRC.PINCH protein expression in the stroma was increased from normal mucosa to primary tumors and further to lymph node metastases. In particular, PINCH expression was most intense at the tumor invasive margin, which was related to low inflammatory infiltration and independently related to an unfavorable prognosis. Low inflammatory infiltration at the tumor invasive margin was related to advanced tumor stage, worse differentiation and microsatellite instability (MSI). Further, it was independently related to an unfavorable prognosis. Increased blood and lymphatic vessel density was observed in the primary tumors compared with the corresponding normal mucosa. However, neither angiogenesis nor lymphangiogenesis was associated with tumor stage and patients’ survival. Moreover, PINCH was present in a proportion of endothelial cells of the tumor vasculature, and PINCH expression in tumor-associated stroma was positively related to blood vessel density.In primary tumor cells of CRC, strong expression of hRAD50, hMRE11 or hNBS1 was related to microsatellite stability (MSS). A high percentage of hMRE11 expression was associated with less local recurrence and high apoptotic activity. Further, we observed that the expression of hRAD50, hMRE11 or hNBS1 among normal mucosa, primary tumors and metastases in MSS CRC differed from that in MSI CRC. In MSS CRC, the expression intensity of hRAD50, hMRE11 and hNBS1 was consistently increased with respect to normal mucosa, but there was no difference between the primary tumors and metastases. In the primary MSS tumors, the expression of individual or combination of hRAD50/hMRE11/hNBS1 was associated with a favorable prognosis in the same series of the CRCs. Moreover, strong/high hRAD50 in MSS primary tumors was related to earlier tumor stage, better differentiation and high inflammatory infiltration, whereas strong hNBS1 expression tended to be independently related to a favorable prognosis in MSS CRC with earlier tumor stage. However, in MSI CRC, there were neither differences in the expression of hRAD50/hMRE11/hNBS1 among normal mucosa, primary tumors and metastases, nor any association of the protein expressions with clinicopathological variables. On the other hand, frameshift mutations of (A)9 at coding region of hRAD50 were only found in MSI CRC.Our study indicates that 1) PINCH is likely a regulator of angiogenesis, and PINCH expression at the tumor invasive margin is an independent prognostic indicator in CRC. 2) Inflammatory infiltration at the tumor invasive margin is also an independent prognostic indicator in CRC. The lack of association between high inflammatory infiltration and MSI may help to explain the non-association of MSI with survival in CRC patients. 3) Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis occur in the early stage of CRC development, but do not associate with CRC progression and patients’ prognosis. 4) hRAD50/hMRE11/hNBS1 may act dependently and independently, playing different roles in MSS and MSI CRC development. In MSS CRC, the strong expression of the three proteins, associated with a favorable prognosis, may present the cellular response against tumor progression. Expression of hNBS1 may be a prognostic indicator for MSS CRC patients in the earlier tumor stage. In MSI CRC, the frameshift mutations at the coding region of hRAD50 may contribute to tumor development.
|
|
| 63. |
- Gkekas, Ioannis, 1981-, et al.
(författare)
-
Colon cancer patients with mismatch repair deficiency are more likely to present as acute surgical cases
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Cancer. - : Elsevier. - 0959-8049 .- 1879-0852. ; 157, s. 1-9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The effect of the genetic imprint on the emergency presentation of colon cancer remains unclear. The disparity between tumours evolving along different carcinogenetic pathways has not been studied systematically. This retrospective multicenter cohort study evaluates the association between mismatch repair status and the risk for acute surgery of colon cancer.Patients and methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study including in total 870 patients from three different countries. Scandinavian cohort (Finland and Sweden), including a total of 412 patients operated between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2010, was validated against a cohort from the Czech Republic, including a total of 458 patients, operated between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019. The proficiency or deficiency of mismatch repair was determined by immunohistochemistry. Primary outcome was the risk for acute colon cancer surgery given as the Odds Ratio (OR) in the univariable and multivariable analyses. Acute colon cancer surgery was defined as surgery performed during the same hospital admission as when the diagnosis of colon cancer was made.Results: Of the 870 patients (399 females [46%]) included in the analyses, median age at surgery was 69 [interquartile range, 61–76] years, deficient Mismatch Repair (dMMR) status was found in 190 patients (22%), and 179 patients (21%) underwent acute surgery during the same hospital admission as when the diagnosis of colon cancer was made. In the Scandinavian cohort, a significant association between dMMR status and acute surgery was seen in both the univariable (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.11–3.02, P = 0.017) and the multivariable (OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.28–3.95, P = 0.005) analyses. This was confirmed in the Czech validation cohort in both the univariable (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.09–3.26, P = 0.022) and the multivariable (OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.15–3.18, P = 0.021) analyses.Conclusion: This multicenter study reveals a strong association between acute colon cancer surgery and dMMR tumour status.
|
|
| 64. |
- Gkekas, Ioannis, et al.
(författare)
-
Deficient mismatch repair as a prognostic marker in stage II colon cancer patients
- 2019
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 45:10, s. 1854-1861
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: A number of reports have evaluated the relationship between deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) and colorectal cancer prognosis. Unfortunately, the exact prognostic role of dMMR has not been clearly established due to contradictory results. This study aims to determine the prognostic impact of dMRR in stage II colon cancer patients only. The appropriate identification of high-risk stage II colon cancers is of paramount importance in the selection of patients who may benefit from adjuvant treatment after surgery.METHODS: Four hundred and fifty-two patients with curative resection of stage II colon cancer were included. Hospital records were used as data source, providing clinical, surgical, pathology, oncology and follow-up information for statistical analysis focusing on overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Mismatch repair status was determined by immunohistochemistry. Patient survival was followed-up for a mean of 77·35 months.RESULTS: dMMR was detected in 93 of 452 patients (20·6%). No impact on overall survival (Log-Rank, p = 0·583, 95% CI 0·76-1·67). However, the hazard ratio 0·50 for TTP was highly significant (Log-Rank, p = 0·012, 95% CI 0·28-0·87) in patients with dMMR compared with those with mismatch repair proficient tumours (pMMR).CONCLUSIONS: Patients with dMMR tumours have a lower risk for recurrence compared to those with pMMR tumours, but this finding did not correlate to better overall survival.
|
|
| 65. |
- Gkekas, Ioannis, et al.
(författare)
-
Microsatellite instability as a prognostic factor in stage II colon cancer patients : a meta-analysis of published literature
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Anticancer Research. - : Anticancer Research USA Inc.. - 0250-7005 .- 1791-7530. ; 37:12, s. 6563-6574
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND/AIM: The prognostic role of microsatellite instability (MSI) in stage II colon cancer patients remains controversial despite the fact that it has been investigated in a number of studies. Hazard ratios differ considerably among these studies. We performed a meta-analysis to define the significance of MSI in this group of patients.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies indexed in PubMed presenting separate data on MSI status and survival outcomes for stage II colon cancer patients have been analyzed using fixed-effect meta-analysis of hazard ratio (HR) according to the method of Peto.RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 19 studies including 5,998 patients. A 47.3% of patients received postoperative chemotherapy and included 52.8% males and 47.2% females. Eight studies included some rectal cancer patients although this cohort was not clearly defined in 3 of these. MSI observed in 20.8% (mean) of patients (median 19.9%). HR for overall survival (OS) of MSI vs. microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors for the entire population: 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.33-1.65); HR for disease-free survival (DFS):0.60 (95%CI=0.27-1.32). No statistical significant difference was found when studies analyzing MSI with genotyping (MG) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were compared separately (MG vs. IHC: HR OS 0.45, 95%CI=0.10-2.05 vs. 0.95, 95%CI=0.57-1.58; HR DFS 0.51, 95%CI=0.14-1.85 vs. 0.67, 95%CI=0.26-1.70). However, numerically MSI determination with genotyping shows significantly lower hazard ratios for both DFS and OS. Separate analysis of studies describing colon cancer patients only showed HR OS 0.72 (95%CI=0.31-1.71); HR DFS 0.60 (95%CI=0.27-1.31).CONCLUSION: No significant relation was found between MSI status and OS or DFS. Routine determination of MSI status to guide postoperative management of stage II colon cancer patients cannot be recommended. New large scale high quality studies are needed to answer this question definitively, since currently analyzed studies vary considerably.
|
|
| 66. |
- Gkekas, Ioannis, 1981-
(författare)
-
Mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancer : prognosis and prediction for basic treatment strategies
- 2021
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant healthcare problem worldwide, being the third most common cancer and the fourth most frequent cause of cancer death. Environmental and dietary factors such as alcohol abuse, cigarette smoking, and genetic predisposition seem to constitute the main aetiologies.Two major distinct molecular genetic pathways have been recognised as models of transition from normal epithelium to adenoma and carcinoma. The first involves chromosomal instability (CIN) and the second involves microsatellite instability (MSI). The MSI pathway constitutes 2-4% of CRCs with a hereditary Mismatch Repair (MMR) defect (dMMR) and approximately 15% of sporadic MMR defects due to epigenetic silencing of the MutL homologue 1 (MLH1) promoter. Extracellular factors and spontaneous copy errors necessitate molecular systems to survey and repair human genetic information, and to protect it from chemical disruption. A complicated and entangled network of DNA damage response mechanisms, including multiple DNA repair pathways, damage tolerance processes, and cell cycle checkpoints safeguard genomic integrity. It has recently become apparent that key proteins contributing tocellular survival by taking part in DNA repair become executioners in the face of excess DNA damage. All prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms have major DNA repair pathways. In each of these DNA repair pathways there are key proteins that have dual functions in DNA damage sensing/repair and apoptosis, taking advantage of the fact that DNA is a double helix with the same information present on both strands. Damages that affect one strand can easily be repaired by excision and replacement with newly synthesised DNA using the complementary strand as a template. MMR plays a critical role in the repair of errors that occur spontaneously during DNA replication, such as single base mismatches. dMMR increases the mutation frequency in an affected cell by approximately 1000 times, leading to MSI through the accumulation of short repetitive DNA sequences called microsatellites. Carcinogenesis in dMMR cases can present as hereditary cases (Lynch syndrome) due to germline mutation inin one of the main MMR genes – MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 or somatic/sporadic cases (epigenetic silencing or somatic inactivation of MLH1promoter. dMMR seems to have a favourable prognosis as these CRCs seems to be less prone to metastasising. This phenomenon is much more obvious for tumour stages II and III, while in advanced disease dMMR seems to lose its positive prognostic effect. Even if the underlying mechanism is not fully understood, some studies attribute the positive effect of dMMR tumours to their increased immunogenicity leading to a stronger more effective immune response. On the other hand, the predictive value of the dMMR mechanism isless well understood and has only gained attention in recent years. In general, dMMR seems to predict a poor response to 5-FU, the basis of gastrointestinal chemotherapy.The aims of this thesis were: 1. To review the latest publications on the role of MSI status as prognostic factor in stage II colon cancer (CC) patients (Study I); 2. To validate MMR status as a prognostic factor in patients with CC Stage II (Study II); 3. To verify MMR status as a predictive factor in relation to the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II CC (Study III); 4. To investigate the potential role of MMR status as a risk factor for acute CC surgery (Study IV); and finally 5. To investigate the association between CRC with sporadic dMMR and non-colorectal malignancy (Study V).Study I, a meta-analysis reviewing recently published papers, revealed that MSI status in stage II CC patients does not seem to affect overall survival (OS)and disease-free survival (DFS). This lack of impact could be explained by selection bias and the extremely high proportion of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in the studies included. This was the first meta-analysis specifically evaluating patients with colon cancer stage II. The optimal treatment algorithm for these patients remains unclear, and approximately 20% experience relapse and finally die from disseminated disease.Study II verified the prognostic role of MMR status in patients with stage II CC. Patients with a dMMR tumour have a significantly lower risk for cancer recurrence, a finding that is particularly important for CC treatment. This relationship does not correlate to a better OS since these patients are older and often die from other causes. Debate on the best postoperative strategy in stage II CC continues. What this study contributes is the idea that determination of MMR status can have prognostic value in these patients.Study III also verified the predictive role of MMR status in patients with stageII CC, only this time in relation to treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with proficient MMR (pMMR) status receiving adjuvant chemotherapy have a significantly better OS than those not receiving adjuvant treatment. This relationship was not seen in patients with a dMMR tumour. Furthermore, patients with a pMMR tumour receiving adjuvant treatment have a significantly longer survival time after the first relapse compared to those not receiving adjuvant treatment.Study IV revealed the higher probability of dMMR tumours to present as a surgical emergency. Stage III and IV tumours were also associated with acute surgery. This association was significant regardless of the potential bias due toretrospective methodology and possible heterogeneity between the differentcohorts. Further research is required before our conclusions can be applied in clinical practice due to the multicomplex relationship and interactions between variables that influence the oncologic outcome of acute CC surgery.Study V revealed that patients with sporadic, non-hereditary dMMR CRC run a greater risk for having non-colorectal cancer prior to or after the diagnosis ofCRC. This implies that patients with a dMMR tumour should be screened for other non-colorectal cancer, more so than in the the general population.Conclusion: CRC continues to be a significant healthcare problem worldwide, and treatment algorithms for patients with different genomic backgrounds can vary significantly. This thesis supports the idea of using MMR status as a prognostic and predictive factor in everyday clinical practice, especially in stage II CC and acute cases.
|
|
| 67. |
- Gkekas, Ioannis, et al.
(författare)
-
Mismatch repair status predicts survival after adjuvant treatment in stage II colon cancer patients.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0022-4790 .- 1096-9098. ; 121:2, s. 392-401
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stage II colon cancer is primarily a surgical disease. Only a still not well-defined subset of patients may benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The relationship between adjuvant chemotherapy and survival after relapse is furthermore still not definitely explored in this group of patients. A number of reports suggest some association between defective mismatch repair (dMMR) and colorectal cancer stage II prognosis, but due to contradictory results from existing studies, the exact predictive role is still not fully understood.METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study including 451 stage II colon cancer patients. The proficiency or deficiency of mismatch repair was tested using immunohistochemistry and analyzed in relationship to two survival outcomes: overall survival (OS) and postrelapse survival.RESULTS: Patients with dMMR (20.4%) derived no OS benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-2.38; P = .897). Patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had the significantly better OS in comparison to those not receiving chemotherapy (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.82; P = .004). This relationship remained significant in multivariable analysis (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.78; P = .007). Patients with pMMR relapsing after adjuvant treatment lived significantly longer than those relapsing without previous adjuvant treatment (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.96; P = .033) and this result remained significant in the multivariable model (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.93; P = .030).CONCLUSION: In stage II CC patients, adjuvant chemotherapy improves therapeutic outcomes only in patients with pMMR tumors. Survival after relapse in patients having received adjuvant chemotherapy is significantly longer for patients with pMMR. No survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was seen among patients with dMMR tumors.
|
|
| 68. |
- Gkekas, Ioannis, 1981-, et al.
(författare)
-
Sporadic deficient mismatch repair in colorectal cancer increases the risk for non-colorectal malignancy : a European multicenter cohort study
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0022-4790 .- 1096-9098.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and Objectives: Disparities between tumors arising via different sporadic carcinogenetic pathways have not been studied systematically. This retrospective multicenter cohort study evaluated the differences in the risk for non-colorectal malignancy between sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients from different DNA mismatch repair status.Methods: A retrospective European multicenter cohort study including in total of 1706 CRC patients treated between 1996 and 2019 in three different countries. The proficiency (pMMR) or deficiency (dMMR) of mismatch repair was determined by immunohistochemistry. Cases were analyzed for tumor BRAFV600E mutation, and BRAF mutated tumors were further analyzed for hypermethylation status in the promoter region of MLH1 to distinguish between sporadic and hereditary cases. Swedish and Finish patients were matched with their respective National Cancer Registries. For the Czech cohort, thorough scrutiny of medical files was performed to identify any non-colorectal malignancy within 20 years before or after the diagnosis of CRC. Poisson regression analysis was performed to identify the incidence rates of non-colorectal malignancies. For validation purposes, standardized incidence ratios were calculated for the Swedish cases adjusted for age, year, and sex.Results: Of the 1706 CRC patients included in the analysis, 819 were female [48%], median age at surgery was 67 years [interquartile range: 60–75], and sporadic dMMR was found in 188 patients (11%). Patients with sporadic dMMR CRC had a higher incidence rate ratio (IRR) for non-colorectal malignancy before and after diagnosis compared to patients with a pMMR tumor, in both uni- (IRR = 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.89–3.31, p = 0.003) and multivariable analysis (IRR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.67–3.01, p = 0.004). This association applied whether or not the non-colorectal tumor developed before or after the diagnosis of CRC in both uni- (IRR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.28–2.98, p = 0.004), (IRR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.72–3.49, p = 0.004) and multivariable analysis (IRR = 1.67,95% CI = 1.05–2.65, p = 0.029), (IRR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.63–3.42, p = 0.005), respectively.Conclusion: In this retrospective European multicenter cohort study, patients with sporadic dMMR CRC had a higher risk for non-colorectal malignancy than those with pMMR CRC. These findings indicate the need for further studies to establish the need for and design of surveillance strategies for patients with dMMR CRC.
|
|
| 69. |
- Gunnarsson, Ulf, et al.
(författare)
-
Association between local immune cell infiltration, mismatch repair status and systemic inflammatory response in colorectal cancer
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Translational Medicine. - : BioMed Central. - 1479-5876 .- 1479-5876. ; 18
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammatory response in colorectal cancer (CRC) has been established as a prognostic factor for impaired cancer-specific survival, predominantly in patients with right-sided tumors. On the other hand, defective mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors, primarily located in the right colon, are known to have favorable survival and dense local immune infiltration. The aim of this study was to see if there is any form of relationship between these seemingly diverse entities.METHODS: Complete clinical and long-term survival data were retrieved for 316 CRC patients operated at Helsinki University Hospital between the years 1998 and 2003. Tissue microarrays were prepared from surgical specimens and further processed and analyzed for local immune cell infiltration using multispectral imaging with a Vectra quantitative pathology imaging system and Inform software. Multiplex immunohistochemistry was applied using antibodies against CD66b, CD8, CD20, FoxP3, CD68 and pan-Cytokeratin. After exclusions, data on immune infiltration were available for 275 patients. Mismatch repair status was determined by immunohistochemistry.RESULTS: CRP was seen to be an independent predictor of cancer-specific survival but not overall survival in uni- and multivariable (HR 1.01 (1.00-1.02); p = 0.028) analyses of non-irradiated patients. There was no significant difference in CRP according to mismatch repair status, but all cases (n = 10) with CRP ≥ 75 mg/l had proficient mismatch repair (pMMR). There was a significant negative correlation between intratumor stromal infiltration by T-regulatory FOXP3+ cells and CRP (p = 0.006). There was significantly lower intratumor stromal infiltration by FOXP3+ cells (p = 0.043) in the right colon compared to the rectum, but no significant difference in CRP (p = 0.44). CRP was not a predictor of overall survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.01) nor cancer-specific survival in irradiated patients (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.94-1.02).CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant negative relationship between SIR, defined as an elevated CRP, and intratumor stromal infiltration by T-regulatory FOXP3+ cells. This and the fact that all cases with a CRP > 75 mg/l had pMMR suggests that SIR and dMMR are independent entities in CRC. Indeed, the general lack of difference in CRP between cases with dMMR and pMMR may be evidence of overlap in cases with a less pronounced SIR.
|
|
| 70. |
- Gustafsson, Sofia B, et al.
(författare)
-
High tumour cannabinoid CB(1) receptor immunoreactivity negatively impacts disease-specific survival in stage II microsatellite stable colorectal cancer
- 2011
-
Ingår i: PLOS ONE. - San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science. - 1932-6203. ; 6:8, s. 1-11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: There is good evidence in the literature that the cannabinoid system is disturbed in colorectal cancer. In the present study, we have investigated whether CB(1) receptor immunoreactive intensity (CB(1)IR intensity) is associated with disease severity and outcome. Methodology/Principal Findings: CB(1)IR was assessed in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens collected with a consecutive intent during primary tumour surgical resection from a series of cases diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Tumour centre (n = 483) and invasive front (n = 486) CB(1)IR was scored from 0 (absent) to 3 (intense staining) and the data was analysed as a median split i.e. CB(1)IR <2 and >= 2. In microsatellite stable, but not microsatellite instable tumours (as adjudged on the basis of immunohistochemical determination of four mismatch repair proteins), there was a significant positive association of the tumour grade with the CB1IR intensity. The difference between the microsatellite stable and instable tumours for this association of CB(1)IR was related to the CpG island methylation status of the cases. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses indicated a significant contribution of CB(1)IR to disease-specific survival in the microsatellite stable tumours when adjusting for tumour stage. For the cases with stage II microsatellite stable tumours, there was a significant effect of both tumour centre and front CB(1)IR upon disease specific survival. The 5 year probabilities of event-free survival were: 8565 and 66+/-8%; tumour interior, 86+/-4% and 63+/-8% for the CB(1)IR<2 and CB(1)IR >= 2 groups, respectively. Conclusions/Significance: The level of CB(1) receptor expression in colorectal cancer is associated with the tumour grade in a manner dependent upon the degree of CpG hypermethylation. A high CB(1)IR is indicative of a poorer prognosis in stage II microsatellite stable tumour patients.
|
|
