| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Feldt, K., et al.
(författare)
-
Change in mitral regurgitation severity impacts survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- 2019
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 294, s. 32-36
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The impact of a change in mitral regurgitation (MR) following TAVR is unknown. We studied the impact of baseline MR and early post-procedural change in MR on survival following TAVR. Methods: The SWEDEHEART registry included all TAVRs performed in Sweden. Patients were dichotomized into no/mild and moderate/severe MR groups. Vital status, echocardiographic data at baseline and within 7 days after TAVR were analyzed. Results: 1712 patients were included. 1404 (82%) had no/mild MR and 308 (18%) had moderate/severe MR. Baseline moderate/severe MR conferred a higher mortality rate at 5-year follow-up (adjusted HR 1.29, CI 1.01-1.65, p = 0.04). Using persistent <= mild MR as the reference, when moderate/severe MR persisted or if MR worsened from <= mild at baseline to moderate/severe after TAVR, higher 5-year mortality rates were seen (adjusted HR 1.66, CI 1.17-2.34, p = 0.04; adjusted HR 1.97, CI 1.29-3.00, p = 0.002, respectively). If baseline moderate/severe MR improved to = mild after TAVR no excess mortality was seen (HR 1.09, CI 0.75-1.58, p = 0.67). Paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PVL) was inversely associated with MR improvement after TAVR (OR 0.4, 95%: CI 0.17-0.94; p = 0.034). Atrial fibrillation (OR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.27-3.39, p = 0.004), self-expanding valve (OR 3.8, 95% CI: 2.08-7.14, p < 0.0001), and PVL (4.3, 95% CI 2.32-7.78. p < 0.0001) were associated with MR worsening. Conclusions: Moderate/severe baseline MR in patients undergoing TAVR is associated with a mortality increase during 5 years of follow-up. This risk is offset if MR improves to <= mild, whereas worsening of MR after TAVR is associated with a 2-fold mortality increase.
|
|
| 3. |
- Karason, Kristjan, 1962, et al.
(författare)
-
Randomized trial of a left ventricular assist device as destination therapy versus guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with advanced heart failure. Rationale and design of the SWEdish evaluation of left Ventricular Assist Device (SweVAD) trial
- 2020
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Heart Failure. - : Wiley. - 1388-9842 .- 1879-0844. ; 22:2, s. 739-50
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims Patients with advanced heart failure (AdHF) who are ineligible for heart transplantation (HTx) can become candidates for treatment with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in some countries, but not others. This reflects the lack of a systematic analysis of the usefulness of LVAD systems in this context, and of their benefits, limitations and cost-effectiveness. The SWEdish evaluation of left Ventricular Assist Device (SweVAD) study is a Phase IV, prospective, 1:1 randomized, non-blinded, multicentre trial that will examine the impact of assignment to mechanical circulatory support with guideline-directed LVAD destination therapy (GD-LVAD-DT) using the HeartMate 3 (HM3) continuous flow pump vs. guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) on survival in a population of AdHF patients ineligible for HTx. Methods A total of 80 patients will be recruited to SweVAD at the seven university hospitals in Sweden. The study population will comprise patients with AdHF (New York Heart Association class IIIB-IV, INTERMACS profile 2-6) who display signs of poor prognosis despite GDMT and who are not considered eligible for HTx. Participants will be followed for 2 years or until death occurs. Other endpoints will be determined by blinded adjudication. Patients who remain on study-assigned interventions beyond 2 years will be asked to continue follow-up for outcomes and adverse events for up to 5 years. Conclusion The SweVAD study will compare survival, medium-term benefits, costs and potential hazards between GD-LVAD-DT and GDMT and will provide a valuable reference point to guide destination therapy strategies for patients with AdHF ineligible for HTx.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Esmaily, Sorosh, et al.
(författare)
-
Patient Outcomes after Heart Transplantation in Sweden between 1988 and 2017: Continuous Improvement in Survival.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: The Journal of heart and lung transplantation. 39 (4), S284. - : Elsevier BV. - 1557-3117 .- 1053-2498.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- To investigate the survival of heart transplant (HTx) recipients during different time periods in Sweden. We hypothesized that the survival for HTx recipients has improved following advancements in the management of these patients.Data was obtained through the database of the organ exchange organization Scandiatransplant. All patients who underwent HTx in Sweden between Jan 1988 and Dec 2017 were included. Patients were divided into five cohorts of six-year periods each.A total of 1137 HTx recipients were included. Main causes of transplantation were dilated cardiomyopathy (44 %) and ischemic heart disease (18 %). Retransplantation constituted a small portion of the overall total (2 %). The cohorts were similar in terms of age and gender, while later cohorts had higher BMI, lower GFR and longer ischemia time (Tab. 1). The later cohorts received organs from older donors (Tab. 1). The amount of heart transplantations performed in Sweden has increased with time (Tab. 1). Log-rank test comparing the survival curves was able to show improved survival during later eras (Fig. 1).Survival among HTx recipients has significantly improved in Sweden over time, despite less favorable recipients and donor characteristics. This was related to both reduced postoperative mortality and also improved long-time survival.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
