| 1. |
- Tedeholm, Helen, 1978, et al.
(författare)
-
Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Multiple Sclerosis Journal. - : SAGE Publications (UK and US). - 1352-4585 .- 1477-0970. ; 19:6, s. 765-774
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: It is currently unknown whether early immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) can delay the transition to secondary progression (SP). less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanObjective: To compare the time interval from onset to SP in patients with RRMS between a contemporary cohort, treated with first generation disease modifying drugs (DMDs), and a historical control cohort. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanMethods: We included a cohort of contemporary RRMS patients treated with DMDs, obtained from the Swedish National MS Registry (disease onset between 1995-2004, n = 730) and a historical population-based incidence cohort (onset 1950-64, n = 186). We retrospectively analyzed the difference in time to SP, termed the "period effect" within a 12-year survival analysis, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanResults: We found that the "period" affected the entire severity spectrum. After adjusting for onset features, which were weaker in the contemporary material, as well as the therapy initiation time, the DMD-treated patients still exhibited a longer time to SP than the controls (hazard ratios: men, 0.32; women, 0.53). less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanConclusion: Our results showed there was a longer time to SP in the contemporary subjects given DMD. Our analyses suggested that this effect was not solely driven by the inclusion of benign cases, and it was at least partly due to the long-term immunomodulating therapy given.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Demirbüker, S. Safer, et al.
(författare)
-
A Swedish nationwide pharmaco-epidemiological and genetic study of the long-term safety and effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (IMSE 5)
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Multiple Sclerosis Journal. - : Sage Publications. - 1352-4585 .- 1477-0970. ; 24:Suppl. 2, s. 701-702
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an oral therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), which has been included in the Swedish post-market surveillance study “Immunomodulation and Multiple Sclerosis Epidemiology 5” (IMSE 5) in order to monitor and determine the long-term safety and effectiveness in a real-world setting.Objectives: To follow-up the long-term safety and effectiveness of DMF in a real-world setting.Methods: MS patients are registered into the nationwide Swedish Neuro Registry (NeuroReg) in Sweden. The IMSE 5 study obtains descriptive data of adverse events (AEs), Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Severity Scale (MSSS), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), European Quality of Life - Five Dimensions Test (EQ-5D) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from NeuroReg. Drug survival was measured using the Kaplan-Meier curve and effectiveness measures were assessed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test.Results: 2010 DMF-treated patients have been included in the IMSE 5 study between March 2014 and April 2018. 73 % were female and the mean age at treatment start was 40.6 years. The mean treatment duration was 22.3 months. 92 % of the patients had RRMS with 2 % missing data on MS phenotype. Most patients switched from interferon and glaimer acetat (41 %) and 24 % of the patients were treatment naïve (13 % were missing data on prior treatment). The overall one year drug survival was 74 % and 889 patients terminated their treatment at some point. Most patients (39 %) switched to rituximab (15 % have no new treatment registered). The most common reason for discontinuation was AEs (53 %) and lack of effect (29 %). 227 (11 %) patients have continued treatment for ≥36 months. In patients treated with DMF continuously for ≥24 months (n=918), significant improvements in mean values at 24 months of treatment compared to mean baseline values have been noted for EDSS (1.9 ± 1.6 to 1.6 ± 1.6, n=196); MSSS (2.5 ± 2.4 to 2.0 ± 2.0, n=145); SDMT (52.6 ± 11.0 to 53.8 ± 11.7, n=315); MSIS-29 Psychological Subscale (26.3 ± 22.8 to 21.8 ± 20.6, n=337); and EQ-5D (0.76 ± 0.23 to 0.81 ± 0.20, n=284).Conclusions: NeuroReg proves to function well as a post-marketing drug surveillance platform, providing data regarding drug effectiveness and AEs. A longer follow-up period is needed to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of DMF.
|
|
| 10. |
- Demirbüker, S. Safer, et al.
(författare)
-
A Swedish nationwide pharmaco-epidemiological study of the long-term safety and effectiveness of teriflunomid (IMSE 4)
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Multiple Sclerosis Journal. - : Sage Publications. - 1352-4585 .- 1477-0970. ; 24:Suppl. 2, s. 922-923
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Teriflunomid (TFM) is an oral therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), which has been included in the Swedish post-market surveillance study “Immunomodulation and Multiple Sclerosis Epidemiology 4” (IMSE 4) in order to surveille and determine the long-term safety and effectiveness in a real-world setting.Objectives: To follow-up the long-term safety and effectiveness of TFM in a real-world setting.Methods: MS patients are registered into the nationwide Swedish Neuro Registry (NeuroReg) in Sweden. The IMSE 4 study obtains descriptive data of adverse events (AEs), Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Severity Scale (MSSS), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), European Quality of Life - Five Dimensions Test (EQ-5D) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from NeuroReg. Drug survival was measured using the Kaplan-Meier curve.Results: 481 TFM-treated patients have been included in the IMSE 4 study between March 2014 and April 2018. 70 % were female and the mean age at treatment start was 45.8 years. The mean treatment duration was 20.5 months. 89 % of the patients had RRMS with 3 % missing data on MS phenotype. Most patients switched from interferon and glatimer acetat (37 %) and 14 % of the patients were treatment naïve before starting TFM. The overall one year drug survival rate was 81 % and the overall two year drug survival rate was 41 %. 168 (35 %) patients terminated their treatment at some point, of which 33 % started rituximab treatment and 22 % have no new treatment registered. The most common reasons for discontinuation were AEs (49 %) and lack of effect (40 %). 318 patients have been continuously treated with TFM for ≥12 months and mean baseline values compared to val-ues at 12 months have been noted for EDSS (2.0 ± 1.5 to 2.2 ± 1.5, n=141); MSSS (2.6 ± 2.2 to 2.9 ± 2.3, n=126); SDMT (50.8 ± 10.5 to 50.8 ± 10.7, n=165); MSIS-29 Physiological subscale (20.2 ± 19.3 to 19.7 ± 20.0, n=181); MSIS-29 Psychological subscale (28.1 ± 22.2 to 23.7 ± 21.7, n=181); EQ-5D (0.74 ± 0.24 to 0.73 ± 0.26, n=154); and VAS (70.0 ± 20.8 to 70.8 ± 19.6, n=150).Conclusions: NeuroReg proves to function well as a post-marketing drug surveillance platform, providing data regarding drug effectiveness and AEs. However, a longer follow-up period is needed to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of TMF.
|
|
