| 1. |
- Björkenheim, Anna, 1980-, et al.
(author)
-
Does zero atrial fibrillation burden after atrial fibrillation ablation mean that patients are free of symptoms?
- 2017
-
In: Europace, Supplements. - : Oxford University Press. - 1099-6044 .- 1749-365X. ; 19:Duppl. 3, s. iii264-iii264
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Introduction: Success of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is usually defined as freedom of AF, although symptomatic relief often is what the patient’s desire. After ablation the proportion of ‘silent’ AF increases and success based on symptomatic AF recurrence may be overestimated.Purpose: To investigate the symptomatology of patients who are truly free of AF after ablation.Methods: In 57 patients the symptomatology after AF ablation was assessed as perceived by the patient using a validated AF-specific symptom questionnaire (AF6) and the overall treatment effect (OTE), and as classified by the physician using the EHRA score, at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. The cardiac rhythm was continuously monitored by an implantable loop recorder throughout the 2-year follow-up.Results: At 6, 12 and 24 months 14 (26%), 23 (43%) and 23 (43%) patients had an AF burden 0% during the past 6 months, and 13 of them had an AF burden 0% during the entire 2 year follow-up. All patients reported ‘OTE better’ at all time-points. All patients were also classified into EHRA I at 6 months. Being completely free of AF for six months periods did not mean complete freedom of symptoms, but the median AF6 sum score was consistently low with a narrowing IQR over time, 0 (IQR 0-27), 0.5 (IQR 0-7) and 0 (IQR 0-11) at 6, 12 and 24 months. At 6 months 8/14 patients (57%) scored AF6=0, the others 6, 11, 26, 28, 30 and 46 points. At 12 months 13/23 patients (56%) scored AF6=0, the others 1,1,3,3,5,7,7,7,14 and 22 points. At 24 months 12/23 (52%) patients scored AF6=0, the others 1, 1, 2, 4, 9, 11, 17, 20, 24, 32 and 42 points. Among the AF6 items, ‘worry/anxiety due to AF’ was the most common, while ‘tiredness due to AF’ was the highest scoring item. In the patients with AF burden 0% during the entire 2-year follow-up all patients were improved in OTE and all patients were classified into EHRA class I at all times after ablation and the median AF6 sum score was 4 (IQR0-28), 0.5 (IQR 0-8) and 1 (0-5) at 6, 12 and 24 months after ablation.Conclusions: Sudden elimination of AF by ablation does not automatically eliminate all symptoms that the patients associated with AF, but all patients felt better and were classified in EHRA class I at all time-points. Less than a half of the patients at any time-point scored some symptoms, but the symptoms gradually decreased over time, especially between 6 and 12 months.
|
|
| 2. |
- Björkenheim, Anna, 1980-, et al.
(author)
-
Predictors of hospitalization for heart failure and of all-cause mortality after atrioventricular nodal ablation and right ventricular pacing for atrial fibrillation
- 2014
-
In: Europace. - : Oxford University Press. - 1099-5129 .- 1532-2092. ; 16:12, s. 1772-1778
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aims: Atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) is a highly effective treatment in patients with therapy refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) but renders the patient pacemaker dependent. We aimed to analyse the long-term incidence of hospitalization for heart failure (HF) and all-cause mortality in patients who underwent AVJA because of AF and to determine predictors for HF and mortality.Methods and results: We retrospectively enrolled 162 consecutive patients, mean age 67 +/- 9 years, 48% women, who underwent AVJA because of symptomatic AF refractory to pharmacological treatment (n = 117) or unsuccessful repeated pulmonary vein isolation (n = 45). Hospitalization for HF occurred in 32 (20%) patients and 35 (22%) patients died, representing a cumulative incidence for hospitalization for HF and mortality over the first 2 years after AVJA of 9.1 and 5.2%, respectively. Hospitalization for HF occurred to the same extent in patients who failed pharmacological treatment as in patients with repeated pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), although the mortality was slightly higher in the former group. QRS prolongation >= 120 ms and left atrial diameter were independent predictors of hospitalization for HF, while hypertension and previous HF were independent predictors of death.Conclusion: The long-term hospitalization rate for HF and all-cause mortality was low, which implies that long-term ventricular pacing was not harmful in this patient population, including patients with unsuccessful repeated PVI.
|
|
| 3. |
- Hindricks, Gerhard, et al.
(author)
-
Ability to remotely monitor atrial high-rate episodes using a single-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with a floating atrial sensing dipole
- 2023
-
In: Europace. - : Oxford University Press. - 1099-5129 .- 1532-2092. ; 25:5
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aims: To allow timely initiation of anticoagulation therapy for the prevention of stroke, the European guidelines on atrial fibrillation (AF) recommend remote monitoring (RM) of device-detected atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) and progression of arrhythmia duration along pre-specified strata (6 min...<1h, 1 h...<24 h, >= 24h). We used the MATRIX registry data to assess the capability of a single-lead implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) with atrial sensing dipole (DX ICD system) to follow this recommendation in patients with standard indication for single-chamber ICD.Methods and results: In 1841 DX ICD patients with daily automatic RM transmissions, electrograms of first device-detected AHREs per patient in each duration stratum were adjudicated, and the corresponding positive predictive values (PPVs) for the detections to be true atrial arrhythmia were calculated. Moreover, the incidence and progression of new-onset AF was assessed in 1451 patients with no AF history. A total of 610 AHREs >= 6min were adjudicated. The PPV was 95.1% (271 of 285) for episodes 6min...<1h, 99.6% (253/254) for episodes 1 h...<24h, 100% (71/71) for episodes >= 24h, or 97.5% for all episodes (595/610). The incidence of new-onset AF was 8.2% (119/1451), and in 31.1% of them (37/119), new-onset AF progressed to a higher duration stratum. Nearly 80% of new-onset AF patients had high CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc stroke risk, and 70% were not on anticoagulation therapy. Age was the only significant predictor of new-onset AF.Conclusion: A 99.7% detection accuracy for AHRE >= 1h in patients with DX ICD systems in combination with daily RM allows a reliable guideline-recommended screening for subclinical AF and monitoring of AF-duration progression.
|
|
| 4. |
- Jons, Christian, et al.
(author)
-
The Medical Antiarrhythmic Treatment or Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (MANTRA-PAF) trial : clinical rationale, study design, and implementation
- 2009
-
In: Europace. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1099-5129 .- 1532-2092. ; 11:7, s. 917-923
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- AIMS: No large randomized multicentre trial has evaluated the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) vs. anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy as a first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: The Medical ANtiarrhythmic Treatment or Radiofrequency Ablation (MANTRA-PAF) trial is a randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicentre study designed to test whether catheter-based RFA is superior to optimized AAD therapy in suppressing relapse within 24 months of symptomatic and/or asymptomatic AF in patients with paroxysmal AF without prior AAD therapy. The primary endpoint is cumulative AF burden on repeated 7 days Holter monitoring. Secondary endpoints are: thromboembolic events, hospitalization due to arrhythmia, pro-arrhythmic events, procedure/treatment-related side effects, health economics, quality of life, and change in left ventricular function. Ten centres in Scandinavia and Germany are participating in the study. Enrolment was started in 2005 and as of November 2008, 260 patients have been enrolled into the study. It is expected that enrolment will end by March 2009, when 300 patients have been included. CONCLUSION: The MANTRA-PAF trial will determine whether catheter-based RFA is superior to optimized AAD therapy as a first-line treatment in suppressing long-term relapse of symptomatic and/or asymptomatic AF.
|
|
| 5. |
- Liuba, Ioan, et al.
(author)
-
Source of inflammatory markers in patients with atrial fibrillation
- 2008
-
In: Europace. - : Oxford University Press. - 1099-5129 .- 1532-2092. ; 10, s. 848-853
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aims Elevated levels of C-reactive protein and other inflammatory markers have been reported in some patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether this finding is related to AF per se or to other conditions remains unclear. In addition, the source of inflammatory markers is unknown. Therefore, in the present study, we sought to assess the extent and the source of inflammation in patients with AF and no other concomitant heart or inflammatory conditions. Methods and results The study group consisted of 29 patients referred for radiofrequency catheter ablation: 10 patients with paroxysmal AF, 8 patients with permanent AF, and 10 control patients with Wolf-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome and no evidence of AF (mean age 54±11 vs. 57±13 vs. 43±16). No patient had structural heart diseases or inflammatory conditions. High-sensitive C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) were assessed in blood samples from the femoral vein, right atrium, coronary sinus, and the left and right upper pulmonary veins. All samples were collected before ablation. Compared with controls and patients with paroxysmal AF, patients with permanent AF had higher plasma levels of IL-8 in the samples from the femoral vein, right atrium, and coronary sinus, but not in the samples from the pulmonary veins (median values in the femoral vein: 2.58 vs. 2.97 vs. 4.66 pg/mL, P = 0.003; right atrium: 2.30 vs. 3.06 vs. 3.93 pg/mL, P = 0.013; coronary sinus: 2.85 vs. 3.15 vs. 4.07, P = 0.016). A high-degree correlation existed between the IL-8 levels in these samples (correlation coefficient between 0.929 and 0.976, P< 0.05). No differences in the C-reactive protein and IL-6 levels were noted between the three groups of patients. Conclusion The normal levels of C-reactive protein and IL-6, alongwith the elevated levels of IL-8 in patients with permanent AF but not in those with paroxysmal AF, suggest a link between a low-grade inflammatory reaction and long-lasting AF. The elevated IL-8 levels in the peripheral blood, right atrium, and coronary sinus but not in the pulmonary veins suggest a possible source of inflammation in the systemic circulation.
|
|
