| 1. |
- Andersén, Heidi, et al.
(författare)
-
NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease: a population study.
- 2022
-
Ingår i: ERJ open research. - : European Respiratory Society (ERS). - 2312-0541. ; 8:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may exacerbate respiratory symptoms. A recent European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology position paper recommended the use of an acronym, N-ERD (NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease), for this hypersensitivity associated with asthma or chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of N-ERD and identify factors associated with N-ERD.In 2016, a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of a random adult population of 16000 subjects aged 20-69years was performed in Helsinki and Western Finland. The response rate was 51.5%.The prevalence was 1.4% for N-ERD, and 0.7% for aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). The prevalence of N-ERD was 6.9% among subjects with asthma and 2.7% among subjects with rhinitis. The risk factors for N-ERD were older age, family history of asthma or allergic rhinitis, long-term smoking and exposure to environmental pollutants. Asthmatic subjects with N-ERD had a higher risk of respiratory symptoms, severe hypersensitivity reactions and hospitalisations than asthmatic subjects without N-ERD. The subphenotype of N-ERD with asthma was most symptomatic. Subjects with rhinitis associated with N-ERD, which would not be included in AERD, had the fewest symptoms.We conclude that the prevalence of N-ERD was 1.4% in a representative Finnish adult population sample. Older age, family history of asthma or allergic rhinitis, cumulative exposure to tobacco smoke, secondhand smoke, and occupational exposures increased odds of N-ERD. N-ERD was associated with significant morbidity.
|
|
| 2. |
- Schyllert, Christian, 1983-, et al.
(författare)
-
Low socioeconomic status relates to asthma and wheeze, especially in women
- 2020
-
Ingår i: ERJ Open Research. - : European Respiratory Society (ERS). - 2312-0541. ; 6:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Low socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with asthma and wheezing. Occupational group, educational level and income are commonly used indicators for SES, but no single indicator can illustrate the entire complexity of SES. The aim was to investigate how different indicators of SES associate with current asthma, allergic and nonallergic, and asthmatic wheeze. In 2016, a random sample of the population aged 20-79 years in Northern Sweden were invited to a postal questionnaire survey, with 58% participating (n=6854). The survey data were linked to the national Integrated Database for Labour Market Research by Statistics Sweden for the previous calendar year, 2015. Included SES indicators were occupation, educational level and income. Manual workers had increased risk for asthmatic wheeze, and manual workers in service for current asthma, especially allergic asthma. Primary school education associated with nonallergic asthma, whereas it tended to be inversely associated with allergic asthma. Low income was associated with asthmatic wheeze. Overall, the findings were more prominent among women, and interaction analyses between sex and income revealed that women, but not men, with low income had an increased risk both for asthmatic wheeze and current asthma, especially allergic asthma. To summarise, the different indicators of socioeconomic status illustrated various aspects of associations between low SES and asthma and wheeze, and the most prominent associations were found among women.
|
|
| 3. |
- Tuomisto, Leena E, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical value of bronchodilator response for diagnosing asthma in steroid-naïve adults.
- 2021
-
Ingår i: ERJ open research. - : European Respiratory Society (ERS). - 2312-0541. ; 7:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Spirometry and testing for bronchodilator response have been recommended to detect asthma, and a bronchodilator response (BDR) of ≥12% and ≥200mL has been suggested to confirm asthma. However, the clinical value of bronchodilation tests in newly diagnosed steroid-naïve adult patients with asthma remains unknown. We evaluated the sensitivity of BDR in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) as a diagnostic test for asthma in a real-life cohort of participants in the Seinäjoki Adult Asthma Study. In the diagnostic phase, 369 spirometry tests with bronchodilation were performed for 219 steroid-naïve patients. The fulfilment of each test threshold was assessed. According to the algorithm of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, we divided the patients into obstructive (FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.70) and non-obstructive (FEV1/FVC ≥0.70) groups. Of the overall cohort, 35.6% fulfilled ΔFEV1≥12% and ≥200mL for the initial FEV1, 18.3% fulfilled ΔFEV1≥15% and ≥400 mL for the initial FEV1, and 36.1% fulfilled ΔFEV1≥9% of predicted FEV1 at least once. One-third (31%) of these steroid-naïve patients was obstructive (pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7). Of the obstructive patients, 55.9%, 26.5% and 48.5%, respectively, met the same thresholds. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, different thresholds recognised different kinds of asthma patients. In steroid-naïve adult patients, the current BDR threshold (ΔFEV1≥12% and ≥200mL) has low diagnostic sensitivity (36%) for asthma. In obstructive patients, sensitivity is somewhat higher (56%) but far from optimal. If the first spirometry test with bronchodilation is not diagnostic but asthma is suspected, spirometry should be repeated, and other lung function tests should be used to confirm the diagnosis.
|
|
