| 1. |
- Bengtsson, Daniel, 1975-, et al.
(författare)
-
Increased Mortality Persists after Treatment of Cushing's Disease: A Matched Nationwide Cohort Study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of the Endocrine Society. - : The Endocrine Society. - 2472-1972. ; 6:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Context: Whether biochemical remission normalizes life expectancy in Cushing's disease (CD) patients remains unclear. Previous studies evaluating mortality in CD are limited by using the expected number of deaths in the background population instead of the actual number in matched controls. Objective and setting: To study mortality by time-to-event analysis in an unselected nationwide CD patient cohort. Design and participants: Longitudinal data from the Swedish Pituitary Register of 371 patients diagnosed with CD from 1991 to 2018 and information from the Swedish Cause of Death Register were evaluated. Four controls per patient (n = 1484) matched at the diagnosis date by age, sex, and residential area were included. Main outcome measures: Mortality and causes of death. Results: The median diagnosis age was 44 years (interquartile range 32-56), and the median follow-up was 10.6 years (5.7-18.0). At the 1-, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year follow-ups, the remission rates were 80%, 92%, 96%, 91%, and 97%, respectively. Overall mortality was increased in CD patients compared with matched controls [hazard ratio (HR) 2.1 (95% CI 1.5-2.8)1. The HRs were 1.5 (1.02-2.2) for patients in remission at the last follow-up In = 303), 1.7 (1.03-2.8) for those in remission after a single pituitary surgery In = 177), and 5.6 (2.7-11.6) for those not in remission (n = 31). Cardiovascular diseases (32/66) and infections (12/66) were overrepresented causes of death. Conclusions: Mortality was increased in CD patients despite biochemical remission compared to matched controls. The study highlights the importance of careful comorbidity monitoring, regardless of remission status.
|
|
| 2. |
- Demeneix, Barbara, et al.
(författare)
-
Thresholds and Endocrine Disruptors : An Endocrine Society Policy Perspective
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of the Endocrine Society. - : Oxford University Press. - 2472-1972. ; 4:10
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The concept of a threshold of adversity in toxicology is neither provable nor disprovable. As such, it is not a scientific question but a theoretical one. Yet, the belief in thresholds has led to traditional ways of interpreting data derived from regulatory guideline studies of the toxicity of chemicals. This includes, for example, the use of standard "uncertainty factors" when a "No Adverse Effect Level" (or similar "benchmark dose") is either observed, or not observed. In the context of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), this approach is demonstrably inappropriate. First, the efficacy of a hormone on different endpoints can vary by several orders of magnitude. This feature of hormone action also applies to EDCs that can interfere with that hormone. For this reason, we argue that the choice of endpoint for use in regulation is critical, but note that guideline studies were not designed with this in mind. Second, the biological events controlled by hormones in development not only change as development proceeds but are different from events controlled by hormones in the adult. Again, guideline endpoints were also not designed with this in mind, especially since the events controlled by hormones can be both temporally and spatially specific. The Endocrine Society has laid out this logic over several years and in several publications. Rather than being extreme views, they represent what is known about hormones and the chemicals that can interfere with them.
|
|
| 3. |
- Tatsi, Christina, et al.
(författare)
-
Aggrecan Mutations in Nonfamilial Short Stature and Short Stature Without Accelerated Skeletal Maturation
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Journal of the Endocrine Society. - : Endocrine Society. - 2472-1972. ; 1:8, s. 1006-1011
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aggrecan, a proteoglycan, is an important component of cartilage extracellular matrix, including that of the growth plate. Heterozygous mutations in ACAN, the gene encoding aggrecan, cause autosomal dominant short stature, accelerated skeletal maturation, and joint disease. The inheritance pattern and the presence of bone age equal to or greater than chronological age have been consistent features, serving as diagnostic clues. From family 1, a 6-year-old boy presented with short stature [height standard deviation score (SDS), -1.75] and bone age advanced by 3 years. There was no family history of short stature (height SDS: father, -0.76; mother, 0.7). Exome sequencing followed by Sanger sequencing identified a de novo novel heterozygous frameshift mutation in ACAN (c.6404delC: p.A2135Dfs). From family 2, a 12-year-old boy was evaluated for short stature (height SDS, -3.9). His bone age at the time of genetic evaluation was approximately 1 year less than his chronological age. Family history was consistent with an autosomal dominant inheritance of short stature, with several affected members also showing early-onset osteoarthritis. Exome sequencing, confirmed by Sanger sequencing, identified a novel nonsense mutation in ACAN (c.4852C>T: p.Q1618X), which cosegregated with the phenotype. In conclusion, patients with ACAN mutations may present with nonfamilial short stature and with bone age less than chronological age. These findings expand the known phenotypic spectrum of heterozygous ACAN mutations and indicate that this diagnosis should be considered in children without a family history of short stature and in children without accelerated skeletal maturation.
|
|
| 4. |
- Zoeller, R. Thomas, 1952-, et al.
(författare)
-
European Medicines Agency Conflicts With the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on Bisphenol A Regulation
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of the Endocrine Society. - : Oxford University Press. - 2472-1972. ; 7:9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has revised their estimate of the toxicity of bisphenol A (BPA) and, as a result, have recommended reducing the tolerable daily intake (TDI) by 20 000-fold. This would essentially ban the use of BPA in food packaging such as can liners, plastic food containers, and in consumer products. To come to this conclusion, EFSA used a systematic approach according to a pre-established protocol and included all guideline and nonguideline studies in their analysis. They found that Th-17 immune cells increased with very low exposure to BPA and used this endpoint to revise the TDI to be human health protective. A number of regulatory agencies including the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have written formal disagreements with several elements of EFSA's proposal. The European Commission will now decide whether to accept EFSA's recommendation over the objections of EMA. If the Commission accepts EFSA's recommendation, it will be a landmark action using knowledge acquired through independent scientific studies focused on biomarkers of chronic disease to protect human health. The goal of this Perspective is to clearly articulate the monumental nature of this debate and decision and to explain what is at stake. Our perspective is that the weight of evidence clearly supports EFSA's proposal to reduce the TDI by 20 000-fold.
|
|
