SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

L773:0803 9488
 

Search: L773:0803 9488 > (2015-2019) > Research review > (2015) > Which instruments t...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Which instruments to support diagnosis of depression have sufficient accuracy? A systematic review

Pettersson, Agneta (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Boström, Kristina Bengtsson (author)
Gustavsson, Petter (author)
Karolinska Institutet
show more...
Ekselius, Lisa (author)
Uppsala universitet,Psykiatri, Akademiska sjukhuset
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2015-03-03
2015
English.
In: Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0803-9488 .- 1502-4725. ; 69:7, s. 497-508
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • BACKGROUND: Instruments are frequently used in case finding, diagnosis and severity grading of major depression, but the evidence supporting their utility is weak.AIM: To systematically review the specificity and sensitivity of instruments used to diagnose and grade the severity of depression.METHODS: MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases were searched until April 2014. Fifty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS. The average sensitivity and specificity of each instrument was estimated with hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics analyses and the confidence in the estimates was evaluated using GRADE. Minimum acceptable sensitivity/specificity, with structured interview as the reference, was 80%/80% for structured interviews and 80%/70% for case-finding instruments. The minimum acceptable standard for severity measures was a correlation of 0.7 with DSM-IV classification.RESULTS: Twenty instruments were investigated. The average sensitivity/specificity was 85%/92% for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-Axis-I Disorders (SCID-I), 95%/84% for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), < 70%/85% for the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD), 88%/78% for the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) with a cut-off score of 10, 69%/95% for PHQ-9 as a diagnostic algorithm and 70%/83% for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) with a cut-off score of 7. The confidence in the estimates for the other instruments was very low.CONCLUSIONS: Only the SCID-I, MINI and PHQ-9 with a cut-off score of 10 fulfilled the minimum criteria for sensitivity and specificity. The use of the PRIME-MD and HADS is not supported by current evidence.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Psykiatri (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Psychiatry (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Depressive disorder; Diagnosis; Evidence; Interview; Meta-analysis; Questionnaires; Psychiatric status rating scales; Psychological standards; Standards

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
for (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view