| 1. |
- Magnussen, Christina, et al.
(författare)
-
Sex-Specific Epidemiology of Heart Failure Risk and Mortality in Europe Results From the BiomarCaRE Consortium
- 2019
-
Ingår i: JACC. Heart failure. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 2213-1779 .- 2213-1787. ; 7:3, s. 204-213
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES This study investigates differences between women and men in heart failure (HF) risk and mortality. BACKGROUND Sex differences in HF epidemiology are insufficiently understood. METHODS In 78,657 individuals (median 49.5 years of age; age range 24.1 to 98.7 years; 51.7% women) from community-based European studies (FINRISK, DanMONICA, Moli-sani, Northern Sweden) of the BiomarCaRE (Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe) consortium, the association between incident HF and mortality, the relationship of cardiovascular risk factors, prevalent cardiovascular diseases, biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP]; N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) with incident HF, and their attributable risks were tested in women vs. men. RESULTS Over a median follow-up of 12.7 years, fewer HF cases were observed in women (n = 2,399 [5.9%]) than in men (n = 2,771 [7.3%]). HF incidence increased markedly after 60 years of age, initially with a more rapid increase in men, whereas incidence in women exceeded that of men after 85 years of age. HF onset substantially increased mortality risk in both sexes. Multivariable-adjusted Cox models showed the following sex differences for the association with incident HF: systolic blood pressure hazard ratio (HR) according to SD in women of 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 to 1.14) versus HR of 1.19 (95% CI: 1.14 to 1.24) in men; heart rate HR of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93 to 1.03) in women versus HR of 1.09 (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.13) in men; CRP HR of 1.10 (95% CI: 1.00 to 1.20) in women versus HR of 1.32 (95% CI: 1.24 to 1.41) in men; and NT-proBNP HR of 1.54 (95% CI: 1.37 to 1.74) in women versus HR of 1.89 (95% CI: 1.75 to 2.05) in men. Population-attributable risk of all risk factors combined was 59.0% in women and 62.9% in men. CONCLUSIONS Women had a lower risk for HF than men. Sex differences were seen for systolic blood pressure, heart rate, CRP, and NT-proBNP, with a lower HF risk in women.
|
|
| 2. |
- Savarese, G, et al.
(författare)
-
Correction
- 2019
-
Ingår i: JACC. Heart failure. - : Elsevier BV. - 2213-1787 .- 2213-1779. ; 7:8, s. 735-736
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 3. |
- Savarese, Gianluigi, et al.
(författare)
-
Incidence, Predictors, and Outcome Associations of Dyskalemia in Heart Failure With Preserved, Mid-Range, and Reduced Ejection Fraction
- 2019
-
Ingår i: JACC. Heart failure. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 2213-1779 .- 2213-1787. ; 7:1, s. 65-76
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES This study investigated 1-year incidence and predictors of dyskalemia (dysK) and its outcome associations in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), and HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). BACKGROUND DysK in real-world HF is insufficiently characterized. Fear of dyskalemia may lead to underuse or underdosing of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. METHODS Patients enrolled in the SwedeHF (Swedish Heart Failure) Registry from 2006 to 2011 in Stockholm, Sweden were included in the analyses. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified independent predictors of dysK within 1 year. Time-dependent Cox models assessed outcomes associated with incident dysK (all-cause death, HF, and other cardiovascular disease [CVD] hospitalizations) within 1 year from baseline. RESULTS Of 5,848 patients, 24.4% experienced hyperkalemia (hyperK [K amp;gt; 5.0 mmol/l]) at least once, and 10.2% had moderate or severe hyperK (K amp;gt; 5.5 mmol/l). Adjusted risk of moderate or severe hyperK was highest in HFpEF and HFmrEF. Similarly, 20.3% of patients had at least one episode of hypokalemia (hypoK [amp;lt;3.5 mmol/l]), and 3.7% had severe hypoK (amp;lt;3.0 mmol/l). Adjusted risk of any hypoK was highest in HFpEF. Independent predictors of both hyperK and hypoK were sex, baseline potassium and estimated glomerular filtration rate, low hemoglobin, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), inpatient status, and higher New York Heart Association functional class. Incident dysK was associated with increased risk of mortality. Furthermore, hypoK was associated with increased CVD hospitalizations (HF-related excluded). There was no association between dysK and HF hospitalization risk, regardless of EF. CONCLUSIONS DysK is common in HF and is associated with increased mortality. Risk of moderate or severe hyperK was highest in HFpEF and HFmrEF, whereas risk of hypoK was highest in HFpEF. HF severity, low hemoglobin, COPD, baseline high and low potassium, and low eGFR were relevant predictors of dysK occurrence. (C) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
|
|
| 4. |
- Savarese, Gianluigi, et al.
(författare)
-
Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Longitudinal Ejection Fraction Change in Heart Failure
- 2019
-
Ingår i: JACC. Heart failure. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 2213-1779 .- 2213-1787. ; 7:4, s. 306-317
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the incidence, the predictors, and the associations with outcomes of changes in ejection fraction (EF) in heart failure (HF) patients.BACKGROUND: EF determines therapy in HF, but information is scarce about incidence, determinants, and prognostic implications of EF change over time.METHODS: Patients with >= 2 EF measurements were made in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry were categorized as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (EF >= 50%), heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF) (EF 40% to 49%), or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (EF <40%). Changes among categories were recorded, and associations among EF changes, predictors, and all-cause mortality and/or HF hospitalizations were analyzed using logistic and Cox regressions.RESULTS: Of 4,942 patients at baseline, 18% had HFpEF, 19% had HFmrEF, and 63% had HFrEF. During follow-up, 21% and 18% of HFpEF patients transitioned to HFmrEF and HFrEF, respectively; 37% and 25% of HFmrEF patients transitioned to HFrEF and HFpEF, respectively; and 16% and 10% of HFrEF patients transitioned to HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively. Predictors of increased EF included use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, female sex, cases of less severe HF, and comorbidities. Predictors of decreased EF included diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and cases of more severe HF. Increased EF was associated with a lower risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55 to 0.69) and decreased EF with a higher risk (HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.30) of mortality and/or HF hospitalizations. Prognostic implications were most evident for transitions to and from HFrEF.CONCLUSIONS: Increases in EF occurred in one-fourth of HFrEF and HFmrEF patients, and decreases occurred in more than one-third of patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF. EF change was associated with a wide range of important clinical, treatment, and organizational factors as well as with outcomes, particularly transitions to and from HFrEF.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Schjodt, Inge, et al.
(författare)
-
Socioeconomic Factors and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Heart Failure in a Universal Health Care System
- 2019
-
Ingår i: JACC. Heart failure. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 2213-1779 .- 2213-1787. ; 7:9, s. 746-755
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES This study examined the associations between socioeconomic factors (SEF), readmission, and mortality in patients with incident heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in a tax-financed universal health care system. BACKGROUND Lack of health insurance is considered a key factor in health inequality, leading to poor clinical outcomes. However, data are sparse for the association between SEF and clinical outcomes among patients with HF in countries with tax-financed health care systems. METHODS A nationwide population-based cohort study of 17,122 patients with incident HFrEF was carried out. Associations were assessed between individual-level SEF (cohabitation status, education, and income) and all-cause, HF, and non-HF readmission and mortality within 1 to 30, 31 to 90, and 91 to 365 days, as well as hospital bed days within 1 year after HF diagnosis. RESULTS Low income was associated with a higher risk of all-cause readmission (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08 to 1.43) and non-HF readmission (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.58) within days 31 to 90 as well as with a higher risk of all-cause (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.41), HF (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.55) and non-HF readmission (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.39) within days 91 to 365. Low-income patients also had a higher use of hospital bed days and risk of mortality during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In a tax-financed universal health care system, low income was associated with a higher risk of all-cause and non-HF readmission within 1 to 12 months after HF diagnosis and with HF readmission within 3 to 12 months among patients with incident HFrEF. Low-income patients also had a higher number of hospital bed days and a higher rate of mortality during follow-up. (C) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
|
|
| 7. |
- Stolfo, Davide, et al.
(författare)
-
Sex-Based Differences in Heart Failure Across the Ejection Fraction Spectrum Phenotyping, and Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications
- 2019
-
Ingår i: JACC. Heart failure. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 2213-1779 .- 2213-1787. ; 21, s. 505-505
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES This study assessed sex-related differences in a large cohort of unselected patients with heart failure (HF) across the ejection fraction (EF) spectrum. BACKGROUND Females are under-represented in randomized clinical trials. Potential sex-related differences in HF may question the generalizability of trials. METHODS In the Swedish Heart Failure Registry population multivariate Cox and logistic regression models were fitted to investigate differences in prognosis, prognostic predictors, and treatments across mates and females. RESULTS Of 42,987 patients, 37% were females (55% with HF with preserved EF [HFpEF], 39% with HF with mid-range EF [HFmrEF], and 29% with HF with reduced EF [HFrEF]). Females were older and more symptomatic and more likely to have hypertension and kidney disease but less likely to have diabetes and ischemic heart disease. After adjustments, females were more likely to use beta-blockers and digoxin but less likely to receive HF device therapy. Crude mortality/HF hospitalization rates for HFpEF (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.16) and HFmrEF (HR: 1.14) were significantly higher in females but lower in females with HFrEF (HR: 0.95). After adjustments, the risk was significantly tower in females regardless of EF (HR: 0.80 in HFrEF, HR: 0.91 in HFmrEF, and HR: 0.93 in HFpEF). The main sex-related differences in prognostic predictors concerned diabetes in HFrEF and anemia in HFmrEF. CONCLUSIONS Mates and females with HF showed different characteristics across the EF spectrum. Mates reported a lower crude risk of mortality/morbidity in HFpEF and HFmrEF but higher risk of HFrEF, although after adjustments, prognosis was better in females regardless of EF. The observed sex-related differences highlight the need for an adequate representation of females in HF randomized controlled trials to improve generatizabitity.
|
|
