SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Backman Helena) ;hsvcat:3"

Sökning: WFRF:(Backman Helena) > Medicin och hälsovetenskap

  • Resultat 1-10 av 198
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Haque, Mohammad M., et al. (författare)
  • Cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus : economic evaluation of the TOBOGM study, an international multicenter randomized controlled trial
  • 2024
  • Ingår i: eClinicalMedicine. - : Elsevier. - 2589-5370. ; 71
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • BACKGROUND: A recently undertaken multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) "Treatment Of BOoking Gestational diabetes Mellitus" (TOBOGM: 2017-2022) found that the diagnosis and treatment of pregnant women with early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) improved pregnancy outcomes. Based on data from the trial, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of early GDM (from <20 weeks') among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy compared with usual care (no treatment until 24-28 weeks') from a healthcare perspective.METHODS: Participants' healthcare resource utilization data were collected from their self-reported questionnaires and hospital records, and valued using the unit costs obtained from standard Australian national sources. Costs were reported in US dollars ($) using the purchasing power parity (PPP) estimates to facilitate comparison of costs across countries. Intention-to-treat (ITT) principle was followed. Missing cost data were replaced using multiple imputations. Bootstrapping method was used to estimate the uncertainty around mean cost difference and cost-effectiveness results. Bootstrapped cost-effect pairs were used to plot the cost-effectiveness (CE) plane and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC).FINDINGS: Diagnosis and treatment of early GDM was more effective and tended to be less costly, i.e., dominant (cost-saving) [-5.6% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: -10.1%, -1.2%), -$1373 (95% CI: -$3,749, $642)] compared with usual care. Our findings were confirmed by both the CE plane (88% of the bootstrapped cost-effect pairs fall in the south-west quadrant), and CEAC (the probability of the intervention being cost-effective ranged from 84% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold value of $10,000-99% at a WTP threshold value of $100,000 per composite adverse pregnancy outcome prevented). Sub-group analyses demonstrated that diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women in the higher glycemic range (fasting blood glucose 95-109 mg/dl [5.3-6.0 mmol/L], 1-h blood glucose ≥191 mg/dl [10.6 mmol/L] and/or 2-h blood glucose 162-199 mg/dl [9.0-11.0 mmol/L]) was more effective and less costly (dominant) [-7.8% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: -14.6%, -0.9%), -$2795 (95% CI: -$6,638, -$533)]; the intervention was more effective and tended to be less costly [-8.9% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: -15.1%, -2.6%), -$5548 (95% CI: -$16,740, $1547)] among women diagnosed before 14 weeks' gestation as well. INTERPRETATION: Our findings highlight the potential health and economic benefits from the diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy and supports its implementation. Long-term follow-up studies are recommended as a key future area of research to assess the potential long-term health benefits and economic consequences of the intervention.
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  • Simmons, David, et al. (författare)
  • Regression From Early GDM to Normal Glucose Tolerance and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in the Treatment of Booking Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Study
  • 2024
  • Ingår i: Diabetes Care. - 0149-5992 .- 1935-5548.
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcomes among women with a normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before 20 weeks' gestation (early) and at 24-28 weeks' gestation (late) (no gestational diabetes mellitus, or No-GDM), those with early GDM randomized to observation with a subsequent normal OGTT (GDM-Regression), and those with GDM on both occasions (GDM-Maintained).RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Women at <20 weeks' gestation with GDM risk factors who were recruited for a randomized controlled early GDM treatment trial were included. Women with treated early GDM and late GDM (according to the World Health Organization's 2013 criteria) were excluded from this analysis. Logistic regression compared pregnancy outcomes.RESULTS: GDM-Regression (n = 121) group risk factor profiles and OGTT results generally fell between the No-GDM (n = 2,218) and GDM-Maintained (n = 254) groups, with adjusted incidences of pregnancy complications similar between the GDM-Regression and No-GDM groups.CONCLUSIONS: Women with early GDM but normal OGTT at 24-28 weeks' gestation had pregnancy outcomes that were similar to those of individuals without GDM. Identifying early GDM likely to regress would allow treatment to be avoided.
  •  
4.
  • Sweeting, Arianne, et al. (författare)
  • Relationship Between Early-Pregnancy Glycemia and Adverse Outcomes : Findings From the TOBOGM Study
  • 2024
  • Ingår i: Diabetes Care. - : American Diabetes Association. - 0149-5992 .- 1935-5548.
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • OBJECTIVE: We evaluated associations between early-pregnancy oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose and complications in the Treatment of Booking Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (TOBOGM) cohort to inform prognostic OGTT thresholds. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Individuals with risk factors for hyperglycemia were recruited for an international, multicenter, randomized controlled gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (World Health Organization 2013 criteria) treatment trial. A 2-h 75-g OGTT was performed at <20 weeks' gestation. Individuals with early treated hyperglycemia in pregnancy were excluded from the primary analysis. Early OGTT glucose concentrations were analyzed continuously and in glycemic categories (normal, low band, and high band).RESULTS: Overall, 3,645 individuals had an OGTT at (mean ± SD) 15.6 ± 2.5 weeks. For each 1-SD increase in fasting, 1-h, and 2-h glucose values, there were continuous positive associations with late GDM: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.04 (95% CI 1.82-2.27), 3.05 (2.72-3.43), and 2.21 (1.99-2.45), respectively. There were continuous positive associations between 1-h and 2-h glucose and the perinatal composite (birth <37 + 0 weeks, birth trauma, birth weight ≥4,500 g, respiratory distress, phototherapy requirement, stillbirth/neonatal death, and shoulder dystocia), with aOR 1.15 (95% CI 1.04-1.26) and 1.14 (1.04-1.25), respectively, and with large-for-gestational-age offspring, with aOR 1.18 (1.06-1.31) and 1.26 (1.01-1.25), respectively. Significant associations were also observed between 1-h glucose and cesarean section and between fasting and 2-h glucose and neonatal hypoglycemia. In categorical analysis, only the high-band 1-h glucose (≥10.6 mmol/L [191 mg/dL]) predicted the perinatal composite.CONCLUSIONS: There is a continuous positive association between early-pregnancy OGTT glucose and complications. In individuals with hyperglycemia risk factors, only the high-glycemic-band 1-h glucose corresponded to increased risk of major perinatal complications.
  •  
5.
  • Valgeirsdóttir, Inga Rós, 1984-, et al. (författare)
  • Metformin as treatment of GDM
  • 2023
  • Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • Background: Whether metformin should be used as treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a matter of controversy. Concerns about the effects on neonatal birth weight (mainly small for gestational age, SGA) have been raised in one randomized controlled trial in type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. [1] The aim of this study was to evaluate pregnancy outcomes based on different GDM treatment modalities with focus on metformin.Methods: A cohort study, based on data from the stepped wedge cluster randomized trial; CDC4G (Changing diagnostic criteria for GDM in Sweden - www.cdc4g.se). Screening for GDM involved repeated random plasma glucose measurements and/or clinical risk factors. [2] Data were collected from electronic case record forms, and national health and quality registers. Singleton pregnancies during 2018 (last birth in August 2019) from eight clusters were included. Women with pregestational diabetes and/or previous gastric bypass surgery were excluded. Pregnancy outcomes for different treatment regimens were analyzed for women with GDM compared to the background population without GDM. Logistic regression analyzes with adjustments for confounders (body mass index, age, smoking, country of birth, chronic hypertensive disease and cluster) was performed (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI)) for all outcomes. Results: Of the 54 678 pregnancies included, 2 169 (4.0%) were diagnosed with GDM; of whom 1 076 (49.6%) were treated with diet only (dGDM), 668 (30.8%) with metformin only (mGDM), 116 (5.3%) with insulin only (iGDM), and 309 (14.2%) with both metformin and insulin (miGDM). Pregnancy outcomes were as follows: SGA (10th percentile) was significantly decreased in the mGDM group [aOR 0.57 (95% CI 0.41-0.79)] compared to the background population and no significant difference was found in the miGDM group [aOR 0.78 (95% CI 0.51-1.18)] compared to the background population. No significant difference in SGA (10th percentile) was found in the dGDM group [aOR 1.02 (CI 0.83-1.25)] compared to the background population. There was significant difference in neonates born large for gestational age (LGA, 90th percentile) in both mGDM and miGDM groups compared to the background population [aOR 2.29 (95% CI 1.88-2.78) and aOR 2.32 (95% CI 1.76-3.07), respectively]. There was not significant difference in LGA (90th percentile) in dGDM compared to the background population [aOR 0.90 (95% CI 0.73-1.12].Conclusions: These preliminary unpublished results show no increase in SGA for metformin treated GDM compared to the background population. Outcomes in the diet treated GDM group were similar to the background population. Further analyzes are needed to compare outcomes between pharmacologic treatment groups and assess whether specific treatment regimens lead to similar outcomes in different subgroups (eg ethnicity, obesity and glucose values on diagnostic oral glucose tolerance test).References:1.Feig DS, Donovan LE, Zinman B, Sanchez JJ, Asztalos E, Ryan EA, et al. Metformin in women with type 2 diabetes in pregnancy (MiTy): a multicentre, international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The lancet Diabetes & endocrinology. 2020;8(10):834-44.2.Fadl H, Saeedi M, Montgomery S, Magnuson A, Schwarcz E, Berntorp K, et al. Changing diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in Sweden - a stepped wedge national cluster randomised controlled trial - the CDC4G study protocol. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2019;19(1):398.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  • Harreiter, Jürgen, et al. (författare)
  • Behandlung von früh diagnostiziertem Gestationsdiabetes mellitus vor der 20. Schwangerschaftswoche : [Treatment of early diagnosed Gestational Diabetes mellitus before the 20th Week of Pregnancy]
  • 2023
  • Ingår i: Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift. - : Springer. - 0043-5325 .- 1613-7671. ; 135:Suppl. 7, s. S762-S762
  • Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • Einleitung: Bei Diagnose eines Gestationsdiabetes (GDM) vor der 20.Schwangerschaftswoche (SSW) wird leitliniengemäß eine Therapie begonnen. Für diese Praxis liegt keine Evidenz vor, die eine Verbesserung der Gesundheit von Mutter oder Nachkommen bei GDM-Behandlung in der frühen Schwangerschaft belegt.Methoden: Frauen mit einem Risikofaktor für GDM wurden zwischen 4.−20.SSW bei Vorliegen einer GDM Diagnose nach WHO 2013 Kriterien randomisiert einer Behandlungsgruppe oder einer Kontrollgruppe zugeordnet. Die Behandlungs-gruppe erhielt sofortige GDM Behandlung, während die Kontrollgruppe je nach Ergebnissen eines erneuten oralen Glukosetoleranztests (OGTT) in der 24.−28.SSW eine verschobene oder keine Behandlung erhielt. Die Studie hatte drei primäre Endpunkte: eine Kombination ungünstiger neonataler Ereignisse (Geburt <37.SSW, Geburtstrauma, Geburtsgewicht ≥4500 g, RDS, Phototherapie, Totgeburt/neonataler Tod oder Schulterdystokie), schwangerschaftsbedingte Hypertonieerkrankungen (Präeklampsie, Eklampsie, gestationsbedingter Bluthochdruck) und neonatale fettfreie Körpermasse.Ergebnisse: Insgesamt wurden 802 Frauen randomisiert (406 Sofortbehandlung, 396 Kontrollgruppe). Die Erstvisite fand durchschnittlich in der 15,6 ± 2,5 SSW statt. Der neonatale Kombinationsendpunkt trat bei 94/378 Frauen (24,9 %) bei sofortiger Behandlung und bei 113/370 Frauen (30,5 %) in der Kontrollgruppe auf (adj. Risikounterschied −5,6 %;95 % KI,–10,1;−1,2, RR 0,82;0,68-0,98). Schwangerschaftsbedingter Bluthochdruck trat bei 40/378 Frauen (10,6 %) bei sofortiger Behandlung und bei 37/372 Frauen (9,9 %) in der Kontrollgruppe auf (0,7 %,95 % KI,–1,6;2,9, RR 1.08;0.85–1.38). Die fettfreie Körpermasse der Neugeborenen betrug 2,86 kg bei sofortiger Behandlung und 2,91 kg in der Kontrollgruppe (−0,04 kg; 95 % KI,–0,09;0,02). Untergruppenanalysen zeigten eine stärkere Wirkung der Intervention auf neonatale Ergebnisse bei Frauen mit höheren Blutzuckerwerten und bei OGTT Durchführung vor der 14.SSW.Schlussfolgerung: Die sofortige Behandlung von Gestationsdiabetes vor der 20.SSW führte zu einer geringeren Häufigkeit ungünstiger neonataler Ergebnisse im Vergleich zu späterem Behandlungsbeginn.
  •  
9.
  • Simmons, David, et al. (författare)
  • Effect of treatment for early gestational diabetes mellitus on neonatal respiratory distress : A secondary analysis of the TOBOGM study
  • 2024
  • Ingår i: British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1470-0328 .- 1471-0528.
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with neonatal respiratory distress (NRD) in early Gestational diabetes mellitus (eGDM).DESIGN: Nested case-control analysis of the TOBOGM trial.SETTING: Seventeen hospitals: Australia, Sweden, Austria and India. POPULATION: Pregnant women, <20 weeks' gestation, singleton, GDM risk factors.METHODS: Women with GDM risk factors completed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before 20 weeks: those with eGDM (WHO-2013 criteria) were randomised to immediate or deferred GDM treatment. Logistic regression compared pregnancies with/without NRD, and in pregnancies with NRD, those with/without high-dependency nursery admission for ≤24 h with those admitted for >24 h. Comparisons were adjusted for age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, ethnicity, smoking, primigravity, education and site. Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) are reported.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: NRD definition: ≥4 h of respiratory support (supplemental oxygen or supported ventilation) postpartum. Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS): Supported ventilation and ≥24 h nursery stay.RESULTS: Ninety-nine (12.5%) of 793 infants had NRD; incidence halved (0.50, 0.31-0.79) if GDM treatment was started early. NRD was associated with Caesarean section (2.31, 1.42-3.76), large for gestational age (LGA) (1.83, 1.09-3.08) and shorter gestation (0.95, 0.93-0.97 per day longer). Among NRD infants, >24 h nursery-stay was associated with higher OGTT 1-h glucose (1.38, 1.08-1.76 per mmol/L). Fifteen (2.0%) infants had RDS.CONCLUSIONS: Identifying and treating eGDM reduces NRD risk. NRD is more likely with Caesarean section, LGA and shorter gestation. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms behind this eGDM complication and any long-term effects.
  •  
10.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 198
Typ av publikation
tidskriftsartikel (176)
annan publikation (7)
konferensbidrag (5)
doktorsavhandling (5)
forskningsöversikt (5)
Typ av innehåll
refereegranskat (126)
övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt (72)
Författare/redaktör
Backman, Helena (164)
Rönmark, Eva (116)
Lindberg, Anne (93)
Stridsman, Caroline (73)
Hedman, Linnea, 1979 ... (55)
Lundbäck, Bo, 1948 (44)
visa fler...
Hedman, Linnea (33)
Kankaanranta, Hannu, ... (29)
Lundbäck, Bo (25)
Jansson, Sven-Arne (24)
Backman, Helena, 196 ... (23)
Andersson, Martin (22)
Nwaru, Bright I, 197 ... (19)
Kankaanranta, Hannu (19)
Ekerljung, Linda, 19 ... (16)
Simmons, David (15)
Langhammer, Arnulf (15)
Ilmarinen, Pinja (15)
Piirilä, Päivi (14)
Lundback, Bo (13)
Nilsson, Ulf (12)
Eriksson, Berne (12)
Andersen, Heidi (11)
Nolan, Christopher J ... (11)
Immanuel, Jincy (11)
Piirila, P. (10)
Tuomisto, Leena E. (10)
Mohan, Viswanathan (9)
Blomberg, Anders, 19 ... (9)
Axelsson, Malin (9)
Teede, Helena (9)
Andersen, H. (9)
Sandström, Thomas, 1 ... (8)
Ilmarinen, P. (8)
Sovijarvi, A. (8)
Sovijärvi, Anssi (8)
Lindqvist, Ari (8)
Kautzky-Willer, Alex ... (8)
Cheung, N. Wah (8)
Bashir, Muwada Bashi ... (7)
Schwarcz, Erik (7)
Hague, William M. (7)
Stenfors, Nikolai (6)
Montgomery, Scott, 1 ... (6)
Vanfleteren, Lowie E ... (6)
Piirila, Paivi (6)
Lehtimaki, L. (6)
Krokstad, Steinar (6)
Ekerljung, Linda (6)
Sawalha, Sami, 1975- (6)
visa färre...
Lärosäte
Umeå universitet (162)
Göteborgs universitet (71)
Luleå tekniska universitet (63)
Örebro universitet (28)
Karolinska Institutet (25)
Uppsala universitet (14)
visa fler...
Malmö universitet (12)
Lunds universitet (10)
Chalmers tekniska högskola (2)
Högskolan i Halmstad (1)
Stockholms universitet (1)
Linköpings universitet (1)
Jönköping University (1)
visa färre...
Språk
Engelska (193)
Svenska (4)
Tyska (1)
Forskningsämne (UKÄ/SCB)
Naturvetenskap (1)
Teknik (1)
Samhällsvetenskap (1)

År

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy