| 1. |
- Leijon, Matti, et al.
(author)
-
Improvement of physical activity by a kiosk-based electronic screening and brief intervention in routine primary health care : Patient-initiated versus staff-referred
- 2011
-
In: Journal of Medical Internet Research. - : JMIR Publications Inc.. - 1438-8871. ; 13:4, s. e99-
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Interactive behavior change technology (eg, computer programs, Internet websites, and mobile phones) may facilitate the implementation of lifestyle behavior interventions in routine primary health care. Effective, fully automated solutions not involving primary health care staff may offer low-cost support for behavior change. Objectives: We explored the effectiveness of an electronic screening and brief intervention (e-SBI) deployed through a stand-alone information kiosk for promoting physical activity among sedentary patients in routine primary health care. We further tested whether its effectiveness differed between patients performing the e-SBI on their own initiative and those referred to it by primary health care staff. Methods: The e-SBI screens for the physical activity level, motivation to change, attitudes toward performing the test, and physical characteristics and provides tailored feedback supporting behavior change. A total of 7863 patients performed the e-SBI from 2007 through 2009 in routine primary health care in Östergötland County, Sweden. Of these, 2509 were considered not sufficiently physically active, and 311 of these 2509 patients agreed to participate in an optional 3-month follow-up. These 311 patients were included in the analysis and were further divided into two groups based on whether the e-SBI was performed on the patient's own initiative (informed by posters in the waiting room) or if the patient was referred to it by staff. A physical activity score representing the number of days being physically active was compared between baseline e-SBI and the 3-month follow-up. Based on physical activity recommendations, a score of 5 was considered the cutoff for being sufficiently physically active. Results: In all, 137 of 311 patients (44%) were sufficiently physically active at the 3-month follow-up. The proportion becoming sufficiently physically active was 16/55 (29%), 40/101 (40%), and 81/155 (52%) for patients with a physical activity score at baseline of 0, 1 to 2, and 3 to 4, respectively. The patient-initiated group and staff-referred group had similar mean physical activity scores at baseline (2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-2.3, versus 2.3, 95% CI 2.1-2.5) and at follow-up, (4.1, 95% CI 3.4-4.7, vs 4.2, 95% CI 3.7-4.8). Conclusions: Among the sedentary patients in primary health care who participated in the follow-up, the e-SBI appeared effective at promoting short-term improvement of physical activity for about half of them. The results were similar when the e-SBI was patient-initiated or staff-referred. The e-SBI may be a low-cost complement to lifestyle behavior interventions in routine primary health care and could work as a stand-alone technique not requiring the involvment of primary health care staff. © Matti Leijon, Daniel Arvidsson, Per Nilsen, Diana Stark Ekman, Siw Carlfjord, Agneta Andersson, Anne Lie Johansson, Preben Bendtsen.
|
|
| 2. |
- Leijon, Matti, 1970-, et al.
(author)
-
Is there a demand for physical activity interventions from health care providers? : Findings from a population survey
- 2010
-
In: BMC Public Health. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2458. ; 10:34
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Health care providers in many countries have delivered interventions to improve physical activity levels among their patients. Thus far, less is known about the population's interest to increase their physical activity levels and their opinion about the health care provider's role in physical activity promotion. The aims of this paper were to investigate the self-reported physical activity levels of the population and intention to increase physical activity levels, self-perceived need for support, and opinions about the responsibilities of both individuals and health care providers to promote physical activity.Methods: A regional public health survey was mailed to 13 440 adults (aged 18-84 years) living in Östergötland County (Sweden) in 2006. The survey was part of the regular effort by the regional Health Authorities.Results: About 25% of the population was categorised as physically active, 38% as moderately active, 27% as somewhat active, and 11% as low active. More than one-third (37%) had no intentions to increase their physical activity levels, 36% had thought about change, while 27% were determined to change. Lower intention to change was mainly associated with increased age and lower education levels. 28% answered that physical activity was the most important health-related behaviour to change "right now" and 15% of those answered that they wanted or needed support to make this change. Of respondents who might be assumed to be in greatest need of increased activity (i.e. respondents reporting poor general health, BMI>30, and inactivity) more than one-quarter wanted support to make improvements to their health. About half of the respondents who wanted support to increase their physical activity levels listed health care providers as a primary source for support.Conclusion: These findings suggest that there is considerable need for physical activity interventions in this population. Adults feel great responsibility for their own physical activity levels, but also attribute responsibility for promoting increased physical activity to health care practitioners.
|
|
| 3. |
- Levin, Sara, 1974-, et al.
(author)
-
Risk-Increasing and Risk-Reducing Factors for Violence : A Qualitative Study of Forensic Patients’ Perceptions
- 2022
-
In: International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. - : Taylor & Francis. - 1499-9013 .- 1932-9903. ; 21:4, s. 383-398
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- This study investigated forensic patients’ perceptions of relevant factors for violence risk, to facilitate an understanding of potential reasons for violence and the effect of risk management interventions. Semi-structured interviews with 13 forensic patients were analyzed with qualitative content analysis using an inductive approach. The sample of participants could identify an array of potentially relevant factors for their use of violence related to themselves, the external context, social and relational aspects, as well as situational factors. Most also actively strived to manage such risk. Considering patients’ perceptions could potentially add relevant perspectives and improve clinical and structured risk assessments.
|
|
| 4. |
- Levin, Sara, et al.
(author)
-
Staff perceptions of facilitators and barriers to the use of a short-term risk assessment instrument in forensic psychiatry
- 2018
-
In: Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. - : Taylor & Francis. - 1522-8932 .- 1522-9092 .- 2473-2850 .- 2473-2842. ; 18:3, s. 199-228
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Prospective adverse events within forensic settings should be assessed using structured risk assessment instruments. Our aim was to identify the barriers and facilitators of a structured instrument for assessment of short-term risk within inpatient forensic psychiatric care. The instrument was piloted at a forensic psychiatric clinic. Three focus group interviews were conducted with staff. Content analysis revealed three main categories of barriers and facilitators for clinical use: implementation object, context, and users. Complexity of the instrument, insufficient continuous training and support, difficulties retrieving assessments on wards, and insecurity about translating assessments into actions were perceived barriers to clinical use. Routines for documentation improved communication and the inclusion of protective and short-term dynamic clinical factors were perceived as clinically relevant. Problem-solving ability, attitude, and motivation of staff were facilitating factors. Comprehensive risk assessment instruments require substantial support for staff to find them manageable. Systematic documentation is required to measure actual daily clinical use.
|
|
| 5. |
- Levin, Sara, et al.
(author)
-
Structured risk assessment instruments : A systematic review of implementation determinants
- 2016
-
In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1321-8719 .- 1934-1687. ; 23:4, s. 602-628
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Research-based structured risk assessment instruments (SRAIs) can improve violence risk assessment and clinical judgements in mental health and correctional services. Practical challenges of implementing SRAIs have led to calls for more research to understand the determinants influencing this process. Studies describing determinants for SRAI implementation in psychiatric, correctional, or community in-patient settings were systematically reviewed. Findings were analysed according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A total of 11 studies were included. Four types of main implementation determinants were found: characteristics of the SRAI; users of the SRAI; inner setting; and process. Findings underscore the importance of applying a multifactorial approach to the implementation of SRAIs to address many different barriers and facilitators. More stringent research is needed to obtain more solid evidence of factors that impede or enable SRAI implementation, especially regarding patient perspectives and outer setting determinants. Constructing shared concepts of determinants across research fields could further aid information transferences.
|
|
| 6. |
- Levin, Sara, 1974-
(author)
-
The challenges of using structured risk assessment instruments in forensic psychiatric care
- 2019
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Background: The purpose of psychiatric forensic care is to provide treatment for mentally ill offenders and to prevent future acts of violence and other adverse events. During care, the type of restrictions of freedom, the patient’s continuous need for involuntary treatment and readiness for discharge, are continuously evaluated based on the assessment of risk the patient pose to themselves and others as well as the progress achieved with treatment. The use of structured risk assessment instruments is recommended in clinical guidelines to assess such risks. However, unstructured clinical assessments, considered to be less valid, are often used in clinical practice. There is insufficient research evidence concerning several aspects related to the clinical use of structured risk assessment instruments in terms of guiding the planning and realization of care and risk management interventions. There is also a lack of knowledge about what patients themselves perceive to be mediating factors for their use of violence. Overall aim: The overarching aim of this thesis was to investigate the implementation and use of structured risk assessment instruments to prevent violence and other adverse events in forensic settings and to improve understanding of the factors that influence such events among forensic patients.Methods: Several methods were used for data collection and data were analysed by different types of content analysis. In the first paper, a systematic review of previous research studies on implementation determinants for structured risk assessment instruments in forensic settings was conducted to investigate implementation determinants for such instruments. The second paper evaluates a pilot project of the implementation of a structured risk assessment instrument at a forensic clinic in Östergötland using focus group interviews with staff members who had used the instrument. Their perceptions of the instrument and barriers and facilitators to its implementation and clinical use were investigated. The third paper investigated the actual clinical use of structured risk assessments to guide the planning and realization of care and risk management interventions documented in forensic patients’ records. In the fourth paper, patient perspectives of factors increasing and decreasing the risk for violence were investigated by individual semi-structured interviews with forensic patients.Results: There is a wide variety of determinants for the implementation and clinical use of structured risk assessment instruments, which make such missions complicated. The determinants relate to the characteristics of the implementation object, characteristics of users, the inner setting in which the implementation occurs and the implementation process. Limiting the need to change current routines, and hence the strain on the organization by reducing complexity, and the need for resource allocation seem especially important. Most of the planned risk management interventions in structured risk assessments were realized according to patient records. However, structured risk assessments largely overlap with unstructured risk assessments in terms of planned care and risk management interventions. Noteworthy, most of the interventions realized were not documented as planned. Forensic patients described several risk factors that increased and decreased their use of violence. These factors related to themselves, external influences, social and relational aspects and situational factors. Most patient accounts of mediating factors overlapped with those listed in commonly used risk assessment instruments and previous research. Additional factors identified by patients related to the outer context and interpersonal aspects.Conclusions: There are many barriers and facilitators to the implementation and use of structured risk assessment instruments, implying the need for a multifaceted approach to address determinants at several system levels. Considering the clinical context is important when selecting a structured risk assessment instrument to be implemented, but also the complexity of the instrument, the required change of routines and the provision of continuous resources and interventions to achieve and maintain clinical use. Despite the many barriers, there is evidence of clinical use of both unstructured clinical and structured risk assessments in terms of informing and guiding care and risk management interventions. The large overlap, however, makes it difficult to draw definite conclusion about which type of assessment actually influenced the interventions that were realized. Realized care and risk management interventions are most often not documented as planned. This increases the risk of subjective decisions and provision of interventions, which also make such interventions difficult to evaluate. Forensic patients are actively managing their risk of violence and are capable of identifying and communicating many different mediating factors for their violence risk. They are knowledgeable and important stakeholders and should be involved in their own risk assessments, as well as in research.
|
|
| 7. |
- Trinks, Anna, et al.
(author)
-
Acute Alcohol Consumption and Motivation to Reduce Drinking Among Injured Patients in a Swedish Emergency Department
- 2012
-
In: Journal on Addictions Nursing. - 1088-4602 .- 1548-7148. ; 23:3, s. 152-158
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Abstract: Injuries constitute a major public health problem. Millions of people are injured each year, and acute drinking is a well-known risk factor for injuries. Research suggests that acknowledgment of alcohol as a factor in an injury enhances willingness to change drinking behavior, possibly because the patient becomes aware of the negative consequences of their drinking. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of acute alcohol consumption (drinking before the event) among injury patients and to examine the importance of factors potentially associated with motivation to reduce alcohol consumption among these patients. All patients aged 18-69 years were requested to answer alcohol-related questions on a touchscreen computer. Fifteen percent of injured patients were categorized as acute drinkers, and of these, 64% reported that their injury was connected to alcohol. There were significant differences for all sociodemographic and drinking characteristics between acute drinkers and nonacute drinkers. Acute drinkers were categorized as risky drinkers to a much higher extent than nonacute drinkers. Acute drinkers had a considerably higher average weekly alcohol consumption and engaged far more frequently in heavy episodic drinking than nonacute drinkers. Acute drinkers were motivated to reduce their alcohol intake to a greater extent than nonacute drinkers; 51% were in the action, preparation, and contemplation stages, compared with 19% of the nonacute drinkers. Acute drinkers had considerably more detrimental alcohol consumption than nonacute drinkers, and the acute drinkers were more motivated to reduce their drinking than the nonacute drinkers.
|
|
| 8. |
- Bendtsen, Preben, et al.
(author)
-
Hazardous drinking concepts, limits and methods : Low levels of awareness, knowledge and use in the Swedish population
- 2011
-
In: Alcohol and Alcoholism. - Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0735-0414 .- 1464-3502. ; 46:5, s. 638-645
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aims: To investigate the awareness and knowledge of hazardous drinking limits among the general population in Sweden and the extent to which people estimate their alcohol consumption in standard drinks to assess their level of drinking. Methods: A population-based study involving 6000 individuals selected from the total Swedish population was performed. Data were collected by means of a postal questionnaire. The mail survey response rate was 54.3% (n = 3200) of the net sample of 5891 persons. Results: With regard to drinking patterns, 10% of the respondents were abstainers, 59% were sensible drinkers and 31% were classified as hazardous drinkers. Most of the abstainers (80%), sensible drinkers (64%) and hazardous drinkers (56%) stated that they had never heard about the standard drink method. Familiarity with the hazardous drinking concept also differed between the three categories although 61% of sensible and hazardous drinkers expressed awareness of the concept (46% of the abstainers). Knowledge about the limits for sensible drinking was very poor. Between 94 and 97% in the three categories did not know the limit. There was a statistically significant association between having visited health care within the last 12 months and being aware of the standard drink method and the hazardous drinking concept, but not with knowing the hazardous drinking limits. Similarly, there was a significant association between having had at least one alcohol conversation in health care within the last 12 months and being aware of the standard drink method and the hazardous drinking concept, but not with knowing the hazardous drinking limits. Conclusion: The results can be seen as a major challenge for the health-care system and public health authorities because they imply that a large proportion of the Swedish population does not know when alcohol consumption becomes a threat to their health. The current strategy to disseminate knowledge about sensible drinking limits to the population through the health-care system seems to have failed and new means of informing the population are warranted. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Medical Council on Alcohol. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 9. |
- Bendtsen, Preben, et al.
(author)
-
Referral to an electronic screening and brief alcohol intervention in primary health care in Sweden : Impact of staff referral to the computer
- 2011
-
In: International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications. - : Hindawi Limited. - 1687-6415 .- 1687-6423. ; 918763
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The aim of this paper was to evaluate whether primary health care staff's referral of patients to perform an electronic screening and brief intervention (e-SBI) for alcohol use had a greater impact on change in alcohol consumption after 3 month, compared to patients who performed the test on their own initiative. Staff-referred responders reported reduced weekly alcohol consumption with an average decrease of 8.4 grams. In contrast, self-referred responders reported an average increase in weekly alcohol consumption of 2.4 grams. Staff-referred responders reported a 49 reduction of average number of heavy episodic drinking (HED) occasions per month. The corresponding reduction for self-referred responders was 62. The differences between staff- and self-referred patient groups in the number who moved from risky drinking to nonrisky drinking at the followup were not statistically significant. Our results indicate that standalone computers with touchscreens that provide e-SBIs for risky drinking have the same effect on drinking behaviour in both staff-referred patients and self-referred patients. Copyright © 2011 Preben Bendtsen et al.
|
|
| 10. |
- Carlfjord, Siw, et al.
(author)
-
Applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate two implementation strategies used to introduce a tool for lifestyle intervention in Swedish primary health care
- 2012
-
In: Health Promotion International. - : Oxford University Press. - 0957-4824 .- 1460-2245. ; 27:2, s. 167-176
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The aim of this study was to evaluate two implementation strategies for the introduction of a lifestyle intervention tool in primary health care (PHC), applying the RE-AIM framework to assess outcome. A computer-based tool for lifestyle intervention was introduced in PHC. A theory-based, explicit, implementation strategy was used at three centers, and an implicit strategy with a minimum of implementation efforts at three others. After 9 months a questionnaire was sent to staff members (n= 159) and data from a test database and county council registers were collected. The RE-AIM framework was applied to evaluate outcome in terms of reach, effectiveness, adoption and implementation. The response rate for the questionnaire was 73%. Significant differences in outcome were found between the strategies regarding reach, effectiveness and adoption, in favor of the explicit implementation strategy. Regarding the dimension implementation, no differences were found according to the implementation strategy. A theory-based implementation strategy including a testing period before using a new tool in daily practice seemed to be more successful than a strategy in which the tool was introduced and immediately used for patients.
|
|
