| 1. |
- Casanueva, Felipe F., et al.
(författare)
-
Criteria for the definition of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE): A Pituitary Society Statement
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Pituitary. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1386-341X .- 1573-7403. ; 20, s. 489-498
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- © 2017, The Author(s). Introduction: With the goal of generate uniform criteria among centers dealing with pituitary tumors and to enhance patient care, the Pituitary Society decided to generate criteria for developing Pituitary Tumors Centers of Excellence (PTCOE). Methods: To develop that task, a group of ten experts served as a Task Force and through two years of iterative work an initial draft was elaborated. This draft was discussed, modified and finally approved by the Board of Directors of the Pituitary Society. Such document was presented and debated at a specific session of the Congress of the Pituitary Society, Orlando 2017, and suggestions were incorporated. Finally the document was distributed to a large group of global experts that introduced further modifications with final endorsement. Results: After five years of iterative work a document with the ideal criteria for a PTCOE is presented. Conclusions: Acknowledging that very few centers in the world, if any, likely fulfill the requirements here presented, the document may be a tool to guide improvements of care delivery to patients with pituitary disorders. All these criteria must be accommodated to the regulations and organization of Health of a given country.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ho, Ken, et al.
(författare)
-
Pituitary Neoplasm Nomenclature Workshop: Does Adenoma Stand the Test of Time?
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of the Endocrine Society. - : The Endocrine Society. - 2472-1972. ; 5:3
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- The WHO Classification of Endocrine Tumours designates pituitary neoplasms as adenomas. A proposed nomenclature change to pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) has been met with concern by some stakeholder groups. The Pituitary Society coordinated the Pituitary Neoplasm Nomenclature (PANOMEN) workshop to address the topic. Experts in pituitary developmental biology, pathology, neurosurgery, endocrinology, and oncology, including representatives nominated by the Endocrine Society, European Society of Endocrinology, European Neuroendocrine Association, Growth Hormone Research Society, and International Society of Pituitary Surgeons. Clinical epidemiology, disease phenotype, management, and prognosis of pituitary adenomas differ from that of most NETs. The vast majority of pituitary adenomas are benign and do not adversely impact life expectancy. A nomenclature change to PitNET does not address the main challenge of prognostic prediction, assigns an uncertain malignancy designation to benign pituitary adenomas, and may adversely affect patients. Due to pandemic restrictions, the workshop was conducted virtually, with audiovisual lectures and written précis on each topic provided to all participants. Feedback was collated and summarized by Content Chairs and discussed during a virtual writing meeting moderated by Session Chairs, which yielded an evidence-based draft document sent to all participants for review and approval. There is not yet a case for adopting the PitNET nomenclature. The PANOMEN Workshop recommends that the term adenoma be retained and that the topic be revisited as new evidence on pituitary neoplasm biology emerges.
|
|
| 3. |
- Simon, Julia, et al.
(författare)
-
Prevalence and clinical correlations of SF3B1 variants in lactotroph tumours
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Endocrinology. - 1479-683X. ; 189:3, s. 372-378
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: A somatic mutational hotspot in the SF3B1 gene was reported in lactotroph tumours. The aim of our study was to examine the prevalence of driver SF3B1 variants in a multicentre independent cohort of patients with lactotroph tumours and correlate with clinical data. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicentre study involving 282 patients with lactotroph tumours (including 6 metastatic lactotroph tumours) from 8 European centres. We screened SF3B1 exon 14 hotspot for somatic variants using Sanger sequencing and correlated with clinicopathological data. RESULTS: We detected SF3B1 variants in seven patients with lactotroph tumours: c.1874G > A (p.Arg625His) (n = 4, 3 of which metastatic) and a previously undescribed in pituitary tumours variant c.1873C > T (p.Arg625Cys) (n = 3 aggressive pituitary tumours). In two metastatic lactotroph tumours with tissue available, the variant was detected in both primary tumour and metastasis. The overall prevalence of likely pathogenic SF3B1 variants in lactotroph tumours was 2.5%, but when we considered only metastatic cases, it reached the 50%. SF3B1 variants correlated with significantly larger tumour size; higher Ki67 proliferation index; multiple treatments, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy; increased disease-specific death; and shorter postoperative survival. CONCLUSIONS: SF3B1 variants are uncommon in lactotroph tumours but may be frequent in metastatic lactotroph tumours. When present, they associate with aggressive tumour behaviour and worse clinical outcome.
|
|
