| 1. |
- Lagebrant, Alice, et al.
(författare)
-
Brain injury markers in blood associate with generalised oedema on computed tomography after cardiac arrest
- 2021
-
Ingår i: - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. ; , s. 203-204
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction. According to the 2021 ERC/ESICM guideline recommen-dations, elevated neuron-specific enolase [NSE] levels as well as diffuseand extensive anoxic damage on neuroimaging are predictors of poorneurological outcome after cardiac arrest.(1) We previously describedthat NSE is elevated in patients with generalised oedema on com-puted tomography [CT]. (2).Objectives. In this study, we aim to examine the novel brain injurymarkers serum neurofilament light [NFL], glial fibrillary acidic protein[GFAP] and total-tau [tau] to predict the presence of generalised brainoedema.Methods. Retrospective analysis of patients examined with CT onclinical indication within the Target Temperature Management afterout-of-hospital cardiac arrest [TTM] trial. (2,3) Serum samples fromthe biobank sub study were prospectively collected at 48 h post arrestand analysed after trial completion as published. (4–7) The neuronalmarker NSE, the neuroaxonal injury markers NFL and tau and theastrocytic injury marker GFAP were correlated with the presence ofgeneralised oedema on CT, assessed by local radiologists through vis-ual evaluation. The prognostic accuracy of NSE ≥ 60 ug/l for predictinggeneralised oedema was also analysed.Results. 192 patients had data available on all four biomarkers at 48 hand were examined with CT < 168 h post arrest. Brain injury markerswere significantly higher in patients with generalised oedema as com-pared to patients without oedema on CT scans performed 24–168 hafter ROSC (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1A–D). For CT scans performed < 24 h, onlyNSE levels showed a significant correlation (p < 0.05). Biomarkers pre -dicted generalised oedema with area under the receiver operatingcharacteristics curve [AUC] 67.5–73.2% for CT scans performed < 24 h(n = 111), with no statistically significant difference between themarkers ( Fig. 2A). For scans performed 24–168 h (n = 81) AUC for pre -dicting generalised oedema was 78.1%-82.9%, with no statisticallysignificant difference between the markers. NSE ≥ 60 ug/l at 48 h, asrecommended by guidelines, predicted generalised oedema with 81%(95%CI 67–90%) sensitivity and 77% (95%CI 62–87%) specificity.Conclusion. Concentrations of all evaluated brain injury markerswere significantly higher in patients with generalised oedema on CTperformed after the first 24 h post arrest. Biomarker concentrationsindicate whether generalised oedema on CT is likely and may thus beclinically useful for deciding if a CT scan is sufficient for prognostica-tion or if a MRI is more appropriate.
|
|
| 2. |
- Holgersson, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
Hypothermic versus Normothermic Temperature Control after Cardiac Arrest
- 2022
-
Ingår i: NEJM Evidence. - 2766-5526. ; 1:11, s. 1-13
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUNDThe evidence for temperature control for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest is inconclusive. Controversy exists as to whether the effects of hypothermia differ per the circumstances of the cardiac arrest or patient characteristics.METHODSAn individual patient data meta-analysis of the Targeted Temperature Management at 33°C versus 36°C after Cardiac Arrest (TTM) and Hypothermia versus Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (TTM2) trials was conducted. The intervention was hypothermia at 33°C and the comparator was normothermia. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included poor functional outcome (modified Rankin scale score of 4 to 6) at 6 months. Predefined subgroups based on the design variables in the original trials were tested for interaction with the intervention as follows: age (older or younger than the median), sex (female or male), initial cardiac rhythm (shockable or nonshockable), time to return of spontaneous circulation (above or below the median), and circulatory shock on admission (presence or absence).RESULTSThe primary analyses included 2800 patients, with 1403 assigned to hypothermia and 1397 to normothermia. Death occurred for 691 of 1398 participants (49.4%) in the hypothermia group and 666 of 1391 participants (47.9%) in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.41). A poor functional outcome occurred for 733 of 1350 participants (54.3%) in the hypothermia group and 718 of 1330 participants (54.0%) in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.08; P=0.88). Outcomes were consistent in the predefined subgroups.CONCLUSIONSHypothermia at 33°C did not decrease 6-month mortality compared with normothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. (Funded by Vetenskapsrådet; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers NCT02908308 and NCT01020916.)
|
|
