SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Ehrlén Johan) ;pers:(Luoto Miska)"

Search: WFRF:(Ehrlén Johan) > Luoto Miska

  • Result 1-5 of 5
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Greiser, Caroline, et al. (author)
  • Climate limitation at the cold edge : contrasting perspectives from species distribution modelling and a transplant experiment
  • 2020
  • In: Ecography. - : Wiley. - 0906-7590 .- 1600-0587. ; 43:5, s. 637-647
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The role of climate in determining range margins is often studied using species distribution models (SDMs), which are easily applied but have well-known limitations, e.g. due to their correlative nature and colonization and extinction time lags. Transplant experiments can give more direct information on environmental effects, but often cover small spatial and temporal scales. We simultaneously applied a SDM using high-resolution spatial predictors and an integral projection (demographic) model based on a transplant experiment at 58 sites to examine the effects of microclimate, light and soil conditions on the distribution and performance of a forest herb, Lathyrus vernus, at its cold range margin in central Sweden. In the SDM, occurrences were strongly associated with warmer climates. In contrast, only weak effects of climate were detected in the transplant experiment, whereas effects of soil conditions and light dominated. The higher contribution of climate in the SDM is likely a result from its correlation with soil quality, forest type and potentially historic land use, which were unaccounted for in the model. Predicted habitat suitability and population growth rate, yielded by the two approaches, were not correlated across the transplant sites. We argue that the ranking of site habitat suitability is probably more reliable in the transplant experiment than in the SDM because predictors in the former better describe understory conditions, but that ranking might vary among years, e.g. due to differences in climate. Our results suggest that L. vernus is limited by soil and light rather than directly by climate at its northern range edge, where conifers dominate forests and create suboptimal conditions of soil and canopy-penetrating light. A general implication of our study is that to better understand how climate change influences range dynamics, we should not only strive to improve existing approaches but also to use multiple approaches in concert.
  •  
2.
  • Greiser, Caroline, 1987- (author)
  • Microclimate at range margins : Consequences for boreal forest understory species
  • 2020
  • Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
    • A warmer climate will shift species distributional range margins poleward, but near-ground microclimates may modify these shifts. Cold-adapted northern species at their rear edge may survive locally in microrefugia with a colder microclimate, and warm-adapted southern species at their leading edge may colonize stepping stone habitats with a warmer microclimate. However, we do not always know if species ranges are limited by climate and which role microclimate variation plays in modifying range margins. This is especially true for lowland forests, where forest structure and composition have relatively large influences on near-ground microclimates.In this thesis, I explored patterns and drivers of forest microclimate at the southern margin of the boreal zone in central Sweden, where many northern and southern species meet. First, I measured, modelled and mapped near-ground temperatures across ca. 20 000 km2 of forested land (Paper I). Second, I tested if cold and warm microclimates favour northern and southern understory species, respectively. To answer this, I investigated the occurrence and performance patterns of understory vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens across microclimate gradients at the species’ northern or southern range margins (Paper II-IV). I performed both correlational analyses on natural populations and experimental testing with transplanted populations. Third, I derived recommendations and tools for biodiversity conservation and forest management (Paper I-IV).I found high spatial and temporal variation of forest microclimate, which was in the summer mainly linked to differences in forest density and in the cold season to terrain effects (Paper I). Cold and warm microclimates were occupied by natural edge populations of northern and southern species, respectively (Paper II and IV). However, in the transplant experiments with removed competition other factors were more important for the species performance. The southern herb appeared to cope well with the range of microclimate at its current northern range margin and instead seems to be limited by soil and light in northern conifer-dominated forests (Paper IV). The northern transplanted bryophytes and lichens showed no or a positive response to warmer temperature, but also to higher moisture, to more conifers in the overstory and to less gastropod grazing (Paper III). The results indicate that competition with southern species, herbivory, leaf litter and water scarcity might be more important than temperature as direct limiting factors at the species’ current southern range margin. To conclude, microclimate influences the occurrence and performance of range edge populations, but it likely does so indirectly via effects on water availability and biotic interactions.Forest management heavily modifies near-ground temperature and humidity and hence likely impacts the climate-driven range shifts of understory species. I call for considering these effects in conservation and management actions, e.g. by protecting valuable microclimates, moving from clear-cutting to selective logging, reducing forest fragmentation and drainage and favouring either broad-leaved or coniferous trees in the overstory - depending on the local conservation target (Paper I-IV). Climate-change induced biodiversity loss may thus be slowed down by responsible forest management that provides stepping stone habitats for advancing southern species as well as microrefugia for retreating northern species.
  •  
3.
  • Greiser, Caroline, et al. (author)
  • Monthly microclimate models in a managed boreal forest landscape
  • 2018
  • In: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0168-1923 .- 1873-2240. ; 250-251, s. 147-158
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The majority of microclimate studies have been done in topographically complex landscapes to quantify and predict how near-ground temperatures vary as a function of terrain properties. However, in forests understory temperatures can be strongly influenced also by vegetation. We quantified the relative influence of vegetation features and physiography (topography and moisture-related variables) on understory temperatures in managed boreal forests in central Sweden. We used a multivariate regression approach to relate near-ground temperature of 203 loggers over the snow-free seasons in an area of ∼16,000 km2 to remotely sensed and on-site measured variables of forest structure and physiography. We produced climate grids of monthly minimum and maximum temperatures at 25 m resolution by using only remotely sensed and mapped predictors. The quality and predictions of the models containing only remotely sensed predictors (MAP models) were compared with the models containing also on-site measured predictors (OS models). Our data suggest that during the warm season, where landscape microclimate variability is largest, canopy cover and basal area were the most important microclimatic drivers for both minimum and maximum temperatures, while physiographic drivers (mainly elevation) dominated maximum temperatures during autumn and early winter. The MAP models were able to reproduce findings from the OS models but tended to underestimate high and overestimate low temperatures. Including important microclimatic drivers, particularly soil moisture, that are yet lacking in a mapped form should improve the microclimate maps. Because of the dynamic nature of managed forests, continuous updates of mapped forest structure parameters are needed to accurately predict temperatures. Our results suggest that forest management (e.g. stand size, structure and composition) and conservation may play a key role in amplifying or impeding the effects of climate-forcing factors on near-ground temperature and may locally modify the impact of global warming.
  •  
4.
  • Greiser, Caroline, et al. (author)
  • Warm range margin of boreal bryophytes and lichens not directly limited by temperatures
  • 2021
  • In: Journal of Ecology. - : Wiley. - 0022-0477 .- 1365-2745. ; 109:10, s. 3724-3736
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Species at their warm range margin are potentially threatened by higher temperatures, but may persist in microrefugia. Whether such microsites occur due to more suitable microclimate or due to lower biotic pressure from, for example competitive species, is still not fully resolved. We examined whether boreal bryophytes and lichens show signs of direct climate limitation, that is whether they perform better in cold and/or humid microclimates at their warm range margin. We transplanted a moss, a liverwort and a lichen to 58 boreal forest sites with different microclimates at the species' southern range margin in central Sweden. Species were grown in garden soil patches to control the effects of competitive exclusion and soil quality. We followed the transplanted species over three growing seasons (2016-2018) and modelled growth and vitality for each species as a function of subcanopy temperature, soil moisture, air humidity and forest type. In 2018, we also recorded the cover of other plants having recolonized the garden soil patches and modelled this potential future competition with the same environmental variables plus litter. Species performance increased with warmer temperatures, which was often conditional on high soil moisture, and at sites with more conifers. Soil moisture had a positive effect, especially on the moss in the last year 2018, when the growing season was exceptionally hot and dry. The lichen was mostly affected by gastropod grazing. Recolonization of other plants was also faster at warmer and moister sites. The results indicate that competition, herbivory, shading leaf litter and water scarcity might be more important than the direct effects of temperature for performance at the species' warm range margin. Synthesis. In a transplant experiment with three boreal understorey species, we did not find signs of direct temperature limitation towards the south. Forest microrefugia, that is habitats where these species could persist regional warming, may instead be sites with fewer competitors and enemies, and with sufficient moisture and more conifers in the overstorey.
  •  
5.
  • Hylander, Kristoffer, et al. (author)
  • Microrefugia : Not for everyone
  • 2015
  • In: Ambio. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0044-7447 .- 1654-7209. ; 44, s. s60-S68
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Microrefugia are sites that support populations of species when their ranges contract during unfavorable climate episodes. Here, we review and discuss two aspects relevant for microrefugia. First, distributions of different species are influenced by different climatic variables. Second, climatic variables differ in the degree of local decoupling from the regional climate. Based on this, we suggest that only species limited by climatic conditions decoupled from the regional climate can benefit from microrefugia. We argue that this restriction has received little attention in spite of its importance for microrefugia as a mechanism for species resilience (the survival of unfavorable episodes and subsequent range expansion). Presence of microrefugia will depend on both the responses of individual species to local climatic variation and how climate-forcing factors shape the correlation between local and regional climate across space and time.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-5 of 5

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view