1. |
- Eriksson, Anders, et al.
(författare)
-
Enthymemes in Pauline Argumentation
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference. - 1563383551 ; , s. 243-259
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
2. |
- Eriksson, Anders, et al.
(författare)
-
The Old is Better
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Rhetoric, Ethic and Moral Persuasion in Biblical Discourse: Essays from the 2002 Heidelberg Conference. - 0567028119 ; , s. 52-72
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
- Eriksson, Anders
(författare)
-
Asfyksi - kvaelning
- 2004. - 1
-
Ingår i: Nordisk Laerebog i Retsmedicin. - Copenhagen : FADL. - 8777493230 ; , s. 125-144
-
Bokkapitel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
|
|
7. |
- Eriksson, Anders
(författare)
-
Asfyksi - kvaelning
- 2013. - 3
-
Ingår i: Retsmedicin. - : FADL's Forlag a/s. - 9788777497148 ; , s. 120-135
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
8. |
- Eriksson, Anders
(författare)
-
Asfyksi - kvaelning
- 2008. - 2
-
Ingår i: Retsmedicin. - Köbenhavn : Foreningen af Danske Laegestuderendes Forlag Aktieselskab. - 9788777494994 ; , s. 131-147
-
Bokkapitel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
|
|
9. |
- Eriksson, Anders
(författare)
-
Asfyxi - kvävning
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Rättsmedicin. - : Liber. ; , s. 121-139
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
10. |
- Eriksson, Anders, 1939
(författare)
-
Aural/acoustic vs. automatic methods in forensic phonetic case work
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Neustein, A. & Patil, H. A. (Eds.), Forensic Speaker Recognition: Law Enforcement and Counter-terrorism. - New York : Springer-Verlag New York Inc.. - 9781461402626 ; , s. 41-69
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In this chapter focus will be on speech analysis in a forensic context. Both so called aural/acoustic approaches and automatic methods will be considered and their application in a forensic context described. Forensic casework introduces many challenges not found in the laboratory settings where the applied methods were originally developed. Forensic phonetic case work may involve many different types of tasks like voice comparison, speaker profiling, phonetic transcription and enhancement of poor quality recordings but in the present chapter only voice comparison will be described in any detail. The purpose of forensic speech science is to produce evidence that can be used in court. This introduces other types of challenges like the choice of presentation format. Pros and cons applying the traditional approach using verbal scales vs. using a likelihood ratio approach will be considered and put in the context of a current debate within forensics in general about the presentation of evidence.
|
|