| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Tjerkaski, J, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in myocardial infarction patients with high bleeding risk- A report from the SWEDEHEART registry.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy. - 2055-6837 .- 2055-6845. ; 9:7, s. 627-635
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Ticagrelor is associated with a lower risk of ischemic events than clopidogrel. However, it is uncertain whether the benefits of more intensive anti-ischemic therapy outweigh the risks of major bleeding in patients who have a high bleeding risk (HBR). Therefore, this study compared ticagrelor and clopidogrel in myocardial infarction (MI) patients with HBR.This study included all patients enrolled in the SWEDEHEART registry who were discharged with dual antiplatelet therapy using ticagrelor or clopidogrel following MI between 2010 and 2017. HBR was defined as a PRECISE-DAPT score ≥ 25. Information on ischemic events, major bleeding and mortality was obtained from national registries, with 365 days of follow-up. Additional outcomes include major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of MI, stroke and all-cause mortality, and net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of MACE and bleeding. This study included 25,042 HBR patients, of whom 11,848 were treated with ticagrelor. Ticagrelor was associated with a lower risk of MI, stroke and MACE, but a higher risk of bleeding compared to clopidogrel. There were no significant differences in mortality and NACE. Additionally, when examining the relationship between antiplatelet therapy and bleeding risk in 69,040 MI patients, we found no statistically significant interactions between the PRECISE-DAPT score and treatment effect.We observed no difference in NACE when comparing ticagrelor and clopidogrel in HBR patients. Moreover, we found no statistically significant interactions between bleeding risk and the comparative effectiveness of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in a larger population of MI patients.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Venetsanos, D, et al.
(författare)
-
Correction
- 2021
-
Ingår i: JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. - : Elsevier BV. - 1876-7605 .- 1936-8798. ; 14:17, s. 1964-1964
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Venetsanos, D., et al.
(författare)
-
Utilization and outcomes of rotational atherectomy in Sweden
- 2020
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press. - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 41:Suppl. 2, s. 2528-2528
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Aim: To evaluate utilization and outcomes of rotational atherectomy (RA) using data from the Swedish Coronary and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR).Methods: We included 1476 patients with 2218 lesions who underwent RA from 2005 to 2016. To study temporal changes, the study period was divided into three equal time-periods, period A, B and C.Results: Although the number of RA procedures increased 3-fold from 2005 to 2016, the rate of RA (of all PCI procedures) remained low (0.5% vs 1.2% in 2005 vs 2016). RA patients consisted a high-risk group, with advanced age and clustering of comorbidities. Over time, included patients were older and had a higher risk profile. Trans-radial access, drug eluting stent (DES) use and use of intravascular imaging significantly increased from period A to C whereas positioning of a temporary pacemaker or intra-aortic balloon pump declined. Unfractionated heparin became the main anticoagulant (52 vs 87%) and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors declined (31 vs 12%, in period A vs C). Following RA, 11% of lesions were treated without stent (15 vs 15 vs 8%, in period A, B and C) (Rota-only). In lesions treated with a stent, a bare metal stent (BMS) was implanted in 39% vs 12% vs 2% and a new generation DES (N-DES) in 5 vs 75 vs 97% (period A vs B vs C) of lesions.The 3-year cumulative rate of restenosis was 6.7% (122 events), (11.1 vs 7.1 vs 4.1% in period A vs B vs C). As compared to DES, rota-only (adjusted HR 2.71; 95% CI 1.69- 4.36) and BMS (adjusted HR 3.63; 95% CI 2.27- 5.81) were associated with significantly higher risk for restenosis. First generation DES were associated with numerically higher but not significantly different risk for restenosis as compared to N-DES (adjusted HR 1.31; 95% CI 0.74- 2.31).The 3 year cumulative rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction (MI) or any restenosis was 30.6% (34.2 vs 31.4 vs 28.2%, in period A vs B vs C) and the corresponding numbers for all-cause mortality were 18.1% (18.9 vs 18.4 vs 17.0%). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and angiographic findings, RA in period A was associated with higher risk for MACE as compared to period C (adjusted HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.09- 1.79), due to higher risk for MI and restenosis. The difference disappeared when procedural characteristics, including DES use, were added to the model.The rate of major in-hospital complications was 7.0%, including in-hospital death 1.3%, periprocedural MI 2.8%, perforation 1.1%, cardiac tamponade 0.7%, stroke 0.2% and major bleedings 2.1%. We found no significant differences over time.Conclusion: During the studied period, RA remained a rare procedure, utilised in a highly selected population. Over time a declining rate of restenosis and MI after RA was observed, a finding that appeared to be mainly driven by an increased use of DES. The rate of major in-hospital complication remained low.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Gudmundsson, T., et al.
(författare)
-
Does the quality index of adherence to the evidence-based guidelines predict mortality in patients with myocardial infarction?
- 2022
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press. - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 43:Suppl. 2, s. 2282-2282
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: The SWEDEHEART quality index of hospitals’ adherence to the evidence-based (EB) guidelines for myocardial infarction (MI) patients has been continuously used for several decades in Sweden. The grading protocol is based on the consensus among hospitals. The hospitals are awarded points (0, 0.5, 1) for each of the 11 indicators depending on the proportion of patients who received EB treatment and achieved treatment goals. The 11 indicators at present are reperfusion treatment in STEMI (yes/no), time to-reperfusion treatment in STEMI, time to revascularisation in NSTEMI, P2Y12 antagonists at discharge, ACE-inhibitor/ARB at discharge, the proportion of patients at follow-up, smoking cessation at one-year, participation in a physical exercise program, target LDL-cholesteroland target blood pressure at one year.Purpose: To evaluate whether the SWEDEHEART quality index predicts mortality in patients with MI.Methods: We used data for all MI patients reported to the SWEDEHEAR Tregistry from 72 hospitals in Sweden between 2015–2021. We calculated the difference in quality index between 2021 and 2015. The hospitals were divided into quintiles based on the difference in the score. Logistic regression with log-time offset was used to adjust for confounders (age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, STEMI/NSTEMI, cardiac arrest before admission, occupation status, history of heart failure, prior MI, prior PCI, prior CABG, cardiogenic shock).Results: We identified 98,635 patients with MI, 32,608 (33.1%) were women and 34,198 (34.7%) had STEMI. The average age was 70.8±12.2 years. The median follow-up time was 2.7 years (IQR 1.06–4.63). The crude all-cause mortality rate was 5.5% at 30-days and 22.3% after long-term follow-up. Most hospitals (72.1%) improved their quality index on average by 3.4% per year (P<0.001). The increase in the quality index continued during COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021) with average increase of 8.6%, 95% CI, 0.97–1.02; P<0.001. The median change in SWEDE-HEART quality index score among the quintiles were −1.5 (Q1), 0,5 (Q2), 2,5 (Q3), 3 (Q4), and 4 (Q5). We found no difference in mortality between the quintiles at 30-days (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.97–1.02; p=1.02) and long-term (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0,99–1.02; p=0.850).Conclusion: The SWEDEHEART quality index provides valuable descriptive information about hospitals’ adherence to the guidelines. However, the index, in its current form, does not predict mortality in patients with MI.
|
|
| 10. |
- Gudmundsson, T., et al.
(författare)
-
Importance of hospital and clinical factors in predicting of 30-day mortality in Takotsubo syndrome : data from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press. - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 44:Suppl. 2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Takotsubo syndrome (TS) is an acute heart failure condition that presents with symptoms similar to acute myocardial infarction. TS is often triggered by emotional or physical stress and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality but predictors of mortality in TS patients are not well understood. There is a need to identify high-risk patients and tailor treatment accordingly.Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the importance of various clinical factors in predicting 30-day mortality in TS patients using a machine-learning algorithm capable of identifying complex relationships between variables.Methods: We analyzed data from the nationwide Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry for all TS patients between 2015-2022. Gradient boosting was used to assess the relative importance of variables in predicting 30-day mortality in TS patients.Results: Of the 3,180 hospitalized TS patients, 76% were women. The average age was 68.3 ± 11.2 years. The crude all-cause mortality rate was 2.57% at 30 days. The most important variable in predicting 30-day mortality was the hospital where the patient was treated, with a relative importance of 35.5%. This was followed by the clinical presentation for angiography (21.1%), creatinine level (11.9%), Killip class (8.9%), and age at angioplasty (6.5%). Other less important factors included weight, height, and certain medical conditions such as hyperlipidemia, smoking status, and hypertension. Gender and previous stroke history had a low impact on 30-day mortality in TS patients.Conclusions: The treating hospital was the most important factor in predicting 30-day mortality in TS. Since the level of evidence for recommended treatments of TS is low, our findings highlight the importance of conducting randomized studies in this patient group to improve care.
|
|
