SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Gordon C) ;lar1:(miun)"

Sökning: WFRF:(Gordon C) > Mittuniversitetet

  • Resultat 1-3 av 3
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Kehoe, Laura, et al. (författare)
  • Make EU trade with Brazil sustainable
  • 2019
  • Ingår i: Science. - : American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). - 0036-8075 .- 1095-9203. ; 364:6438, s. 341-
  • Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
  •  
2.
  • Kepp, Kasper P., et al. (författare)
  • Panel stacking is a threat to consensus statement validity
  • 2024
  • Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. - : Elsevier. - 0895-4356 .- 1878-5921. ; 173
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Consensus statements can be very influential in medicine and public health. Some of these statements use systematic evidence synthesis but others fail on this front. Many consensus statements use panels of experts to deduce perceived consensus through Delphi processes. We argue that stacking of panel members toward one particular position or narrative is a major threat, especially in absence of systematic evidence review. Stacking may involve financial conflicts of interest, but nonfinancial conflicts of strong advocacy can also cause major bias. Given their emerging importance, we describe here how such consensus statements may be misleading, by analyzing in depth a recent high-impact Delphi consensus statement on COVID-19 recommendations as a case example. We demonstrate that many of the selected panel members and at least 35% of the core panel members had advocated toward COVID-19 elimination (Zero-COVID) during the pandemic and were leading members of aggressive advocacy groups. These advocacy conflicts were not declared in the Delphi consensus publication, with rare exceptions. Therefore, we propose that consensus statements should always require rigorous evidence synthesis and maximal transparency on potential biases toward advocacy or lobbyist groups to be valid. While advocacy can have many important functions, its biased impact on consensus panels should be carefully avoided.
  •  
3.
  • Wundersitz, D. W. T., et al. (författare)
  • The influence of playing surface on external demands and physiological responses during a soccer match simulation
  • 2021
  • Ingår i: Journal of Sports Sciences. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0264-0414 .- 1466-447X. ; 39:24, s. 2869-2877
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • We investigated the effects of playing surfaces with different impact absorption characteristics on external demand and physiological responses. Fifteen participants completed a soccer match simulation on natural grass, synthetic turf and concrete surfaces. Accelerometry-derived PlayerLoadTM per minute (PL·min−1) and average net force (AvFNet) were used to quantify external demands at the centre of mass (CoM), upper-back, mid-back and hip. Heart rate, oxygen uptake, energy expenditure and RPE quantified physiological responses. The concrete surface exhibited the least impact absorption, with peak decelerations ~3.5x synthetic turf and ~10x natural grass (p < 0.001). Despite this, there was no differences in external demand between surfaces (surface: p ≥ 0.194; η2p≤0.092). Both AvFNet and PL·min−1 (location: p < 0.001; η2p≥0.859) were higher at the hip (613(91)N; 12.5(1.2)arb.u), reduced at the mid-back (521(67)N; 8.8(0.7)arb.u) and upper-back (502(60)N; 8.8(0.7)arb.u) when compared to CoM (576(78)N; 10.7(1.0)arb.u). Although playing surface did not influence the external demands, heart rate or oxygen uptake (p > 0.05), energy expenditure was highest on natural grass compared to synthetic turf (P = 0.034) and RPE was highest on synthetic turf compared to concrete (p = 0.026). Different playing surfaces can alter physiological responses to soccer-specific activity even when the external demands are similar. 
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-3 av 3
Typ av publikation
tidskriftsartikel (3)
Typ av innehåll
refereegranskat (2)
övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt (1)
Författare/redaktör
Rothhaupt, Karl-Otto (1)
Solmi, Marco (1)
Weigend, Maximilian (1)
Müller, Jörg (1)
Farrell, Katharine N ... (1)
Islar, Mine (1)
visa fler...
Krause, Torsten (1)
Uddling, Johan, 1972 (1)
Alexanderson, Helena (1)
Schneider, Christoph (1)
Battiston, Roberto (1)
Lallukka, Tea (1)
Lukic, Marko (1)
Boffetta, Paolo (1)
Pereira, Laura (1)
Riggi, Laura (1)
Cattaneo, Claudio (1)
Jung, Martin (1)
Andresen, Louise C. (1)
Kasimir, Åsa (1)
Wang-Erlandsson, Lan (1)
Sutherland, William ... (1)
Boonstra, Wiebren J. (1)
Vajda, Vivi (1)
Pascual, Unai (1)
Tscharntke, Teja (1)
La Vecchia, Carlo (1)
Brown, Calum (1)
Peterson, Gustaf (1)
Meyer, Carsten (1)
Seppelt, Ralf (1)
Nordström, Peter (1)
Johansson, Maria (1)
Martin, Jean Louis (1)
Olsson, Urban (1)
Hortal, Joaquin (1)
Buckley, Yvonne (1)
Petrovan, Silviu (1)
Schindler, Stefan (1)
Carvalho, Joana (1)
Rivas, Manuel A. (1)
Amo, Luisa (1)
Machordom, Annie (1)
De Smedt, Pallieter (1)
Lindkvist, Emilie (1)
Matos-Maraví, Pável (1)
Bacon, Christine D. (1)
Silvestro, Daniele (1)
Mascarenhas, André (1)
McPhearson, Timon (1)
visa färre...
Lärosäte
Mittuniversitetet  (3)Ta bort avgränsningen
Umeå universitet (1)
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (1)
Lunds universitet (1)
Chalmers tekniska högskola (1)
Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet (1)
Språk
Engelska (3)
Forskningsämne (UKÄ/SCB)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap (2)
Naturvetenskap (1)
Teknik (1)
Samhällsvetenskap (1)

År

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy