| 1. |
- Hinz, P, et al.
(författare)
-
[Thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma surgery units in Germany : a survey].
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Der Unfallchirurg. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1433-044X .- 0177-5537. ; 112:12, s. 1029-33
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: A questionnaire study was conducted to ask trauma surgery centers about thrombosis prophylaxis methods and strategies for the diagnosis and therapy of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). METHODS: Questionnaires were sent by post to German hospitals with trauma surgery units inquiring about the use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), the duration of medication, and the HIT diagnosis. Questionnaires were evaluated descriptively. RESULTS: 314 of 685 questionnaires sent out were evaluable (46%): half were from general hospitals, 96 (31%) from specialized hospitals, and 53 (17%) from tertiary care hospitals (others: 8). In more than 90%, only LMWH was used. The mean duration of pharmacological thrombosis prophylaxis was 16.6+/-10.4 days (inpatient/outpatient). Only 10% adhered to the recommended platelet count controls every 2 days (days 5-14) for early detection of HIT. CONCLUSIONS: While pharmacological thrombosis prophylaxis following trauma surgery seems to be generally performed according to guidelines, diagnosis and treatment of HIT need to be systematized.
|
|
| 2. |
- Hinz, P, et al.
(författare)
-
[Informed consent on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during thrombosis prophylaxis. A pilot study including 460 patients].
- 2003
-
Ingår i: Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. - : Georg Thieme Verlag KG. - 0012-0472 .- 1439-4413. ; 128:42, s. 2184-8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The practicability and acceptance of written information about heparin thrombosis prophylaxis and the associated risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) was evaluated in a pilot study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients consecutively admitted to the department of trauma- and reconstructive surgery at the Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany, with an indication for heparin thrombosis prophylaxis were give written information about thrombosis prophylaxis and the undesired drug effect HIT. After this, acceptance was evaluated using a standardized questionnaire. Primary endpoint was refusal of heparin for thrombosis prophylaxis, secondary endpoint acceptance and comprehensibility of the information. RESULTS: None of the 460 patients included in the study subsequently refused thrombosis prophylaxis with heparin. The majority welcomed the information and thought it should be given to all patients that are about to be treated with heparin. Only 0.9 % of patients judged comprehensibility of the information to be insufficient. Anticipation of imminent heparin therapy (good/very good in 90 %) and appreciation of the quality of care was not judged to be unacceptable by any patient. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that giving information about heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during explanation of the risks and benefits of heparin thrombosis prophylaxis is feasible. This information--given in writing in our pilot study--was judged by patients to be comprehensible and necessary and did not lead to refusal of treatment. Lower incidence of HIT with use of low molecular weight heparins should be considered in the choice of drug for thrombosis prophylaxis.
|
|
| 3. |
- Lubenow, Norbert, et al.
(författare)
-
[Hirudins in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and in thrombosis prophylaxis].
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Hämostaseologie. - 0720-9355. ; 22:3, s. 44-54
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Approved indications for the recombinant hirudins lepirudin (Refludan(R)) und desirudin (Revasc(R)) are therapy of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombosis prophylaxis following knee or hip replacement surgery. Kidney function dependent pharmacokinetics and their capability of inducing antibodies directed against hirudin are characteristic of this class of drugs. However, close dose-monitoring allows safe and effective use of both compounds. While lepirudin is used widely, besides danaparoid, for treatment of HIT, desirudin has not yet been widely accepted for thrombosis prophylaxis following knee or hip replacement surgery.
|
|
