SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Gurrea E)
 

Search: WFRF:(Gurrea E) > Engineering and Technology > A case report of sw...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

A case report of switching from specific vendor-based to R-based pipelines for untargeted LC-MS metabolomics

Fernández-Ochoa, Álvaro (author)
Universidad de Granada
Quirantes-Piné, Rosa (author)
Borrás-Linares, Isabel (author)
show more...
Cádiz-Gurrea, María de la Luz (author)
Universidad de Granada
Riquelme, Marta E.Alarcón (author)
Universidad de Granada
Brunius, Carl, 1974 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Segura-Carretero, Antonio (author)
Universidad de Granada
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2020-01-08
2020
English.
In: Metabolites. - : MDPI AG. - 2218-1989 .- 2218-1989. ; 10:1
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Data pre-processing of the LC-MS data is a critical step in untargeted metabolomics studies in order to achieve correct biological interpretations. Several tools have been developed for pre-processing, and these can be classified into either commercial or open source software. This case report aims to compare two specific methodologies, Agilent Profinder vs. R pipeline, for a metabolomic study with a large number of samples. Specifically, 369 plasma samples were analyzed by HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS. The collected data were pre-processed by both methodologies and later evaluated by several parameters (number of peaks, degree of missingness, quality of the peaks, degree of misalignments, and robustness in multivariate models). The vendor software was characterized by ease of use, friendly interface and good quality of the graphs. The open source methodology could more effectively correct the drifts due to between and within batch effects. In addition, the evaluated statistical methods achieved better classification results with higher parsimony for the open source methodology, indicating higher data quality. Although both methodologies have strengths and weaknesses, the open source methodology seems to be more appropriate for studies with a large number of samples mainly due to its higher capacity and versatility that allows combining different packages, functions, and methods in a single environment.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Programvaruteknik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Software Engineering (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Annan teknik -- Mediateknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Other Engineering and Technologies -- Media Engineering (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Biologi -- Bioinformatik och systembiologi (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Biological Sciences -- Bioinformatics and Systems Biology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Data pre-processing
Mass spectrometry
Metabolomics
R packages
Liquid chromatography
Vendor software

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view