1. |
- Semb, G, et al.
(författare)
-
Erratum
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery. - 2000-6764. ; 51:2, s. 158-158
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
- Christiansen, Ilse, et al.
(författare)
-
Elevated serum levels of soluble ICAM-1 are elevated in non-Hodgkin´s lymphomas and correlate with tumor burden, disease activity and other diagnostic markers
- 1996
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Haematology. - 0007-1048 .- 1365-2141. ; 92:3, s. 639-46
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The serum levels of soluble ICAM-1 (CD54) were significantly elevated in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL, n=127) and hairy cell leukaemia (HCL, n=15) compared with healthy controls (n=31). In high-grade malignant NHL (n=79) the sICAM-1 levels correlated with the tumour mass as reflected in the Ann Arbor staging system but not with bulky disease. Further, the sICAM-1 levels correlated with disease activity as reflected by the presence of B symptoms and with other known prognostic markers. In particular serum thymidine kinase (sTK). In patients with low-grade malignant NHL (n=48) a trend towards higher serum levels of sICAM-1 was found in patients with advanced stage and B symptoms. In both low and high-grade malignant NHL, elevated levels of sICAM-1 were associated with poorer overall and disease-free survival. The present results indicated that sICAM-1 levels have a prognostic power equal to that of other serum markers claimed to be of prognostic value in NHL, namely serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), beta-2-microglobulin (beta2m), serum thymidine kinase (sTK), albumin and orosomucoid. The cellular origin and the possible interactions between soluble and surface ICAM-1 and its ligands needs further exploration.
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
- Eriksson, Mikael, et al.
(författare)
-
Benefit of pazopanib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours: results from a phase II trial (SSG XXI, PAGIST)
- 2021
-
Ingår i: ESMO Open. - : Elsevier BV. - 2059-7029. ; 6:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) resistant to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and sunitinib may be treated with regorafenib, which resulted in a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.8 months in the GRID trial. Also, pazopanib, another tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (PAZOGIST) in the third line, which showed a PFS of 45.2% 4 months after study entry, but patients intolerant to sunitinib were also included. We designed another trial evaluating pazopanib, enrolling only patients with progression on both imatinib and sunitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since all eligible patients had progressive disease, we preferred a non-randomized, phase II multicentre trial so that all patients could receive a potentially active drug. Patients had a progressive metastatic or locally advanced GIST and were ≥18 years of age, with a performance status of 0-2, and sufficient organ functions. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (defined as complete remission + partial remission + stable disease) at 12 weeks on pazopanib. A Simon's two-stage analysis was used with an interim analysis 12 weeks after enrollment of the first 22 patients, and if passed, there was a full enrolment of 72 patients. GIST mutational analysis was done, and most patients had pazopanib plasma concentration measured after 12 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled. The disease control rate after 12 weeks was 44%, and the median PFS was 19.6 weeks (95% confidence interval 12.6-23.4 weeks). Pazopanib-related toxicity was moderate and manageable. No statistically significant differences were found related to mutations. Plasma concentrations of pazopanib had a formal but weak correlation with outcome. CONCLUSION: Pazopanib given in the third line to patients with GIST progressing on both imatinib and sunitinib was beneficial for about half of the patients. The PAGIST trial confirms the results from the PAZOGIST trial, and the median PFS achieved seems comparable to the PFS achieved with regorafenib in the third-line setting.
|
|
9. |
- Osby, E, et al.
(författare)
-
CHOP is superior to CNOP in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma while outcome is unaffected by filgrastim treatment: results of a Nordic Lymphoma Group randomized trial
- 2003
-
Ingår i: Blood. - : American Society of Hematology. - 1528-0020 .- 0006-4971. ; 101:10, s. 3840-3848
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study was designed to test the hypothesis that administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) during induction chemotherapy with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone) or CNOP (doxorubicin replaced with mitoxantrone) in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) improves time to treatment failure (TTF), complete remission (CR) rate, and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, the efficacy of CHOP versus CNOP chemotherapy was compared. A total of 455 previously untreated patients older than 60 years with stages 11 to IV aggressive NHL were included-in the analysis. Patients (median age, 71 years; range, 60-86 years) were randomized to receive CHOP (doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2)) or CNOP (mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2)) with or without G-CSIF (5 mug/kg from day 2 until day 10-14 of each cycle every 3 weeks; 8 cycles). Forty-seven patients previously hospitalized for class I to 11 congestive heart failure were randomized to receive CNOP with or without G-CSF (not included in the CHOP versus CNOP analysis). The CR rates in the CHOP/CNOP plus G-CSF and CHOP/CNOP groups were the same, 52%, and in the CHOP with or without G-CSF and CNOP with or without G-CSF groups, 60% and 43% (P < .001), respectively. No benefit of G-CSF in terms of TTF and OS could be shown (P = .96 and P = .22, respectively), whereas CHOP was superior to CNOP (TTF/OS P < .001). The incidences of severe granulocytopenia (World Health Organization grade IV) and granulocytopenic infections were higher in patients not receiving G-CSF The cumulative proportion of patients receiving 90% or more of allocated chemotherapy was higher (P < .05) in patients receiving G-CSF. Concomitant G-CSF treatment did not improve CR rate, TTF, or OS. Patients receiving CHOP fared better than those given CNOP chemotherapy. The addition of G-CSF reduces the incidence of severe granulocytopenia and infections in elderly patients with aggressive NHL receiving CHOP or CNOP chemotherapy. (C) 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.
|
|
10. |
|
|