| 1. |
- Ahrensbøll-Friis, Ulrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Allergic contact dermatitis from dyes used in the temple of spectacles
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Contact Dermatitis. - : Wiley. - 0105-1873 .- 1600-0536. ; 86:1, s. 25-28
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: We observed an increasing number of patients who presented with facial or retro-auricular dermatitis after skin contact with plastic spectacles or plastic covered temples. Objectives: To identify the allergens in plastic spectacles that may cause allergic contact dermatitis. Methods: All patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis to eyewear were tested with Solvent Orange 60 (SO60), four additionally with Solvent Yellow 14 (SY14), and five with scrapings from their own spectacles. In one case, a chemical analysis of the spectacles was performed to uncover the causative allergen. Results: Three patients were allergic to SO60, two patients to SY14, and two patients were allergic to both SO60 and SY14. Conclusion: Patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis from spectacles should be tested with SO60 and SY14, and based on findings from previous reports, also with Solvent Red 179.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Dahlin, Jakob, et al.
(författare)
-
Chemical burns caused by trifluoroacetic acid.
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Contact Dermatitis. - : Wiley. - 0105-1873. ; 69:3, s. 176-180
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Trifluoroacetic acid is a very strong carboxylic acid. The acid has been suspected to have similar toxic effects as hydrofluoric acid on skin contact. Hydrofluoric acid is highly toxic, owing to skin penetration by fluoride ions. A spill of hydrofluoric acid on the skin may be fatal. As trifluoroacetic acid contains fluorine, patients with chemical burns caused by trifluoroacetic acid have been given particular attention when treated in the hospital.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Dahlin, Jakob, et al.
(författare)
-
Several cases of undesirable effects caused by methacrylate ultraviolet-curing nail polish for non-professional use
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Contact Dermatitis. - : Wiley. - 0105-1873 .- 1600-0536. ; 75:3, s. 151-156
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundUltraviolet (UV)-curing nail polishes based on acrylates or methacrylates are currently also available for non-professional use. The Swedish Medical Products Agency recently prohibited one brand of UV-curing polish, because several consumers reported undesirable effects after using it. ObjectivesTo investigate whether consumers with undesirable effects after using the UV-curing nail polish that was later prohibited were contact allergic to the polish and its individual ingredients. Materials/MethodsEight patients who had reported severe skin reactions after the use of the UV-curing polish were patch tested with two coatings of the nail polish and its ingredients at five dermatology departments in Sweden. ResultsAll patients tested except one showed contact allergic reactions to one or several of the acrylate-based or methacrylate-based ingredients in the nail polish. ConclusionsThe non-professional use of UV-curing nail polishes poses a risk of sensitization from acrylates and methacrylates.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Eriksson, Tomas B.J., et al.
(författare)
-
Contact allergy in Swedish professional ice hockey players
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Contact Dermatitis. - : John Wiley and Sons Inc. - 0105-1873 .- 1600-0536. ; 90:6, s. 574-584
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Professional ice hockey players may contract irritant and allergic contact dermatitis.Aims: To investigate the presence of contact allergy (CA) in professional ice hockey players in Sweden.Methods: Ten teams from the two top leagues were assessed for potential occupational exposure to sensitizers. Exactly 107 players were patch tested with an extended baseline series and a working series, in total 74 test preparations. The CA rates were compared between the ice hockey players and controls from the general population and dermatitis patients.Results: One out of 4 players had at least one contact allergy. The most common sensitizers were Amerchol L 101, nickel and oxidized limonene. CA was as common in the ice hockey players as in dermatitis patients and significantly more common than in the general population. Fragrances and combined sensitizers in cosmetic products (fragrances + preservatives + emulsifier) were significantly more common in ice hockey players compared with the general population.Conclusion: The possible relationship between CA to fragrances and cosmetic products on the one hand and the presence of dermatitis on the other should be explored further.
|
|
| 9. |
- Friis, Ulrik Fischer, et al.
(författare)
-
CI Solvent Yellow 14 (Sudan I) identified as the allergen in a plastic part of glasses
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Contact Dermatitis. - : Wiley. - 0105-1873 .- 1600-0536. ; 82:3, s. 183-185
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- There have been reports of allergic contact dermatitis in response to the plastic part of eyewear. Different substances have been identified as the causative allergens: Solvent Orange 60,1 methylisothiazolinone,2 and triethylene glycol bis(−2ethylhexanoate).3 Here we present the first known case of allergic contact dermatitis caused by CI Solvent Yellow 14 (CAS no. 842–07‐9) used in the plastic part of the glasses, in the temple tips.
|
|
| 10. |
- Isaksson, Marléne, et al.
(författare)
-
Exclusion of Disperse Orange 3 is possible from the textile dye mix present in the Swedish baseline patch test series. A study by the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Contact Dermatitis. - : Wiley. - 0105-1873 .- 1600-0536. ; 88:1, s. 54-59
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background The textile dye mix (TDM) 6.6% in petrolatum contains Disperse Blue (DB) 35, Disperse Yellow 3, Disperse Orange (DO) 1 and 3, Disperse Red 1 and 17, and DB 106 and 124. The most frequent allergen in TDM-positive patients is DO 3. Around 85% of para-phenylenediamine (PPD)-allergic dermatitis patients have been positive to DO 3. There has been a discussion to exclude DO 3 from TDM 6.6% because of strong simultaneous reactions to TDM and PPD. Objectives To study if DO 3 can be excluded from TDM 6.6%. Methods Patch tests were performed on 1481 dermatitis patients with TDM 6.6%, TDM 7.0% (without DO 3 but the other disperse dyes at 1.0% each), DO 3 1.0%, and PPD 1.0% pet. Results Contact allergy to TDM 6.6% was 3.6% and to TDM 7.0% was 3.0%. All 26 DO 3-positive patients were positive to PPD. The 44 patients positive to TDM 7.0% plus the 13 positive to PPD and TDM 6.6% but negative to TDM 7.0% were 57, outnumbering the 53 positive to TDM 6.6%. Conclusion TDM 7.0% can replace TDM 6.6% in the Swedish baseline series, since TDM 7.0% together with PPD 1.0% will detect patients with textile dye allergy.
|
|
