| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Johannesen, Kasper, et al.
(författare)
-
Subcategorizing the Expected Value of Perfect Implementation to Identify When and Where to Invest in Implementation Initiatives
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Medical decision making. - : Sage Publications. - 0272-989X .- 1552-681X. ; 40:3, s. 327-338
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose. Clinical practice variations and low implementation of effective and cost-effective health care technologies are a key challenge for health care systems and may lead to suboptimal treatment and health loss for patients. The purpose of this work was to subcategorize the expected value of perfect implementation (EVPIM) to enable estimation of the absolute and relative value of eliminating slow, low, and delayed implementation. Methods. Building on the EVPIM framework, this work defines EVPIM subcategories to estimate the expected value of eliminating slow, low, or delayed implementation. The work also shows how information on regional implementation patterns can be used to estimate the value of eliminating regional implementation variation. The application of this subcategorization is illustrated by a case study of the implementation of an antiplatelet therapy for the secondary prevention after myocardial infarction in Sweden. Incremental net benefit (INB) estimates are based on published cost-effectiveness assessments and a threshold of SEK 250,000 (22,300) pound per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Results. In the case study, slow, low, and delayed implementation was estimated to represent 22%, 34%, and 44% of the total population EVPIM (2941 QALYs or SEK 735 million), respectively. The value of eliminating implementation variation across health care regions was estimated to 39% of total EVPIM (1138 QALYs). Conclusion. Subcategorizing EVPIM estimates the absolute and relative value of eliminating different parts of suboptimal implementation. By doing so, this approach could help decision makers to identify which parts of suboptimal implementation are contributing most to total EVPIM and provide the basis for assessing the cost and benefit of implementation activities that may address these in future implementation of health care interventions.
|
|
| 5. |
- Johannesen, Kasper, 1982-
(författare)
-
The value of evaluating and implementing pharmaceuticals
- 2021
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Pharmaceuticals are a central part of high-quality health care and a resource for improving population health. However, high prices set by private companies who develop and own the rights to new pharmaceuticals question the value that they contribute to the health care system. Publicly funded health care systems need to get the most from limited health care resources, which has become even more apparent in recent years with ageing populations, rapid technological development, and more recently the impact of COVID-19. Reducing pharmaceutical prices increase the current value that they offer to health care systems, but price reduction also decreases incentives to develop future treatments. Hence, the health care systems must balance the objective of improving the value from the treatments available today and incentivising the development of future treatments. Governments and health care decision makers use a variety of policies to control prices and use of pharmaceuticals. However, these policies are rarely the focus of formal analysis and their effect on short- and long-term population health is often unclear. The aim of this thesis was to investigate how policies that control pharmaceutical prices and implementation impact population health and incentives for pharmaceutical research and development (R&D). The first study in this thesis outlines a framework for assessing the effect of pharmaceutical policies on population health and pharmaceutical earnings and shows that price reducing policies can increase the current value of pharmaceuticals to health care systems while lowering R&D incentives. The design of specific policies determines the impact as well as the distribution of the gains of lower prices across patients, health care providers, pharmacies, and other affected parties. The second study analyses the trade-off between accuracy and cost of the cost-effectiveness appraisals for pharmaceuticals by viewing it as a diagnostic test that aims to identify costeffective treatments. The study identifies some policy relevant conclusions, including that the process should be flexible over time and depend on characteristics of the treatment undergoing assessment. Study three, investigating the impact of regional implementation variation of the antiplatelet ticagrelor, found that an additional 1,100 Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) could have been gained from achieving equal implementation across health care regions. This represents a value of SEK 285 million from avoiding regional implementation variation of ticagrelor (given a value of SEK 250,000 per QALY). The study also shows that avoiding delays due to sequential decisions on reimbursement, treatment guidelines, and funding could have significant value. Finally, the fourth study investigates the comparative effectiveness of ticagrelor using observational data collected as part of routine clinical care in the SWEDEHEART registry. The study finds similar reduction in mortality as observed in the pivotal randomised clinical trial of ticagrelor, the PLATO trial. Furthermore, the importance of appropriate methods for observational research on comparative effectiveness are demonstrated, highlighting the importance of using appropriate methods when investigating the effectiveness of treatments used in clinical practice. In conclusion, this thesis shows the importance of analysing and understanding the effect of policies that control price and implementation of pharmaceuticals, whether the goal is to maximise the value from currently available pharmaceuticals or to also incentivise the development of new pharmaceuticals. Although the value of improving implementation may not be as obvious or tangible as savings from lowering pharmaceutical prices, improving implementation may contribute more to population health than reinvesting potential savings from price reductions.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
