| 1. |
- Berggren, Peter, 1971-, et al.
(författare)
-
The shared priorities measure as a way of assessing team strategic awareness : a bridge between self-assessment and the deep blue sea of field recordings
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. - New York, NY, USA : ACM Digital Library. - 9781450328746 ; , s. 13-
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective, easy to use, easy to comprehend, high face-validity assessment methods for measuring shared awareness in teams are hard to find. This paper describes an experiment where a new measure called Shared Priorities, which is based on ranking of self-generated strategic items, is tested. Trained teams were compared to non-trained teams in a dynamic problem-solving task in terms of performance and shared awareness. The shared priorities measure was used alongside other, well-documented measures of team awareness based on self-rating. The results show that the Shared Priorities measure correlate with performance and could also distinguish between trained and non-trained teams. However, the Shared Priorities measure did not correlate with the other team measures, suggesting that it captures a different quality of team work than the self-rating measures. Further, the shared priorities measure was found to be easily administered and gained a high user acceptance.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Lundberg, Jonas, 1974-, et al.
(författare)
-
Systemic resilience model
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Reliability Engineering & System Safety. - : Elsevier. - 0951-8320 .- 1879-0836. ; 141, s. 22-32
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- It has been realized that resilience as a concept involves several contradictory definitions, both for instance resilience as agile adjustment and as robust resistance to situations. Our analysis of resilience concepts and models suggest that beyond simplistic definitions, it is possible to draw up a systemic resilience model (SyRes) that maintains these opposing characteristics without contradiction. We outline six functions in a systemic model, drawing primarily on resilience engineering, and disaster response: anticipation, monitoring, response, recovery, learning, and self-monitoring. The model consists of four areas: Event-based constraints, Functional Dependencies, Adaptive Capacity and Strategy. The paper describes dependencies between constraints, functions and strategies. We argue that models such as SyRes should be useful both for envisioning new resilience methods and metrics, as well as for engineering and evaluating resilient systems.
|
|
