| 1. |
- Bain, Paul G., et al.
(författare)
-
Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Nature Climate Change. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1758-678X .- 1758-6798. ; 6, s. 154-157
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Personal and political action on climate change is traditionally thought to be motivated by people accepting its reality and importance. However, convincing the public that climate change is real faces powerful ideological obstacles1, 2, 3, 4, and climate change is slipping in public importance in many countries5, 6. Here we investigate a different approach, identifying whether potential co-benefits of addressing climate change7 could motivate pro-environmental behaviour around the world for both those convinced and unconvinced that climate change is real. We describe an integrated framework for assessing beliefs about co-benefits8, distinguishing social conditions (for example, economic development, reduced pollution or disease) and community character (for example, benevolence, competence). Data from all inhabited continents (24 countries; 6,196 participants) showed that two co-benefit types, Development (economic and scientific advancement) and Benevolence (a more moral and caring community), motivated public, private and financial actions to address climate change to a similar degree as believing climate change is important. Critically, relationships were similar for both convinced and unconvinced participants, showing that co-benefits can motivate action across ideological divides. These relationships were also independent of perceived climate change importance, and could not be explained by political ideology, age, or gender. Communicating co-benefits could motivate action on climate change where traditional approaches have stalled.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bartek, Jiri, Jr., et al.
(författare)
-
Scandinavian Multicenter Acute Subdural Hematoma (SMASH) Study : Study Protocol for a Multinational Population-Based Consecutive Cohort
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Neurosurgery. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0148-396X .- 1524-4040. ; 84:3, s. 799-803
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUNDTraumatic acute subdural hematomas (ASDHs) are associated with high rate of morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly individuals. However, recent reports indicate that the morbidity and mortality rates might have improved.OBJECTIVETo evaluate postoperative (30-d) mortality in younger vs elderly (70 yr) patients with ASDH. Comparing younger and elderly patients, the secondary objectives are morbidity patterns of care and 6 mo outcome according to Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). Finally, in patients with traumatic ASDH, we aim to provide prognostic variables.METHODS This is a large-scale population-based Scandinavian study including all neurosurgical departments in Denmark and Sweden. All adult (18 yr) patients surgically treated between 2010 and 2014 for a traumatic ASDH in Denmark and Sweden will be included. Identification at clinicaltrials.gov is NCT03284190.EXPECTED OUTCOMESWe expect to provide data on potential differences between younger vs elderly patients in terms of mortality and morbidity. We hypothesize that elderly patients selected for surgery have a similar pattern of care as compared with younger patients. We will provide functional outcome in terms of GOS at 6 mo in younger vs elderly patients undergoing ASDH evacuation. Finally, clinical useful prognostic factors for favorable (GOS 4-5) vs unfavorable (GOS 1-3) will be identified.DISCUSSION An improved understanding of the clinical outcome, treatment and resource allocation, clinical course, and the prognostic factors of traumatic ASDH will allow neurosurgeons to make better treatment decisions.
|
|
| 3. |
- Bjursten, Henrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Receiving a Second Rescue Valve During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Structural Heart. - : Elsevier. - 2474-8706. ; 8:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a safe procedure. However, complications occur, including uncommon complications such as valve malposition, which requires the implantation of an additional rescue valve (rescue-AV). The aim was to study the occurrence and outcomes of rescue-AV in a nationwide registry. Methods: The Swedish national TAVI registry was used as the primary data source, where all 6706 TAVI procedures from 2016 to 2021 were retrieved. Nontransfemoral access and planned valve-in-valve were excluded. In total, 79 patients were identified as having had a rescue-AV, and additional detailed data were collected for these patients. This dataset was analyzed for any characteristics that could predispose patients to a rescue-AV. The outcome of patients receiving rescue-AV also was studied. Results: Of the 5948 patients in the study, 1.3% had a rescue-AV. There were few differences between patients receiving 1 valve and rescue-AV patients. For patients receiving a rescue-AV, the 30-day mortality was 15.2% compared to 1.6% in the control group. A poor outcome after rescue-AV was often associated with a second complication; for example, stroke, need for emergency surgery, or heart failure. Among the patients with rescue-AV who survived at least 30 days, landmark analyses showed similar survival rates compared to the control group. Conclusions: Among TAVI patients in a nationwide register, rescue-AV occurred in 1.3% of patients. The 30-day mortality in patients receiving rescue-AV was high, but long-term outcome among 30-day survivors was similar to the control group.
|
|
| 4. |
- Esaiasson, Peter, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
How the coronavirus crisis affects citizen trust in institutions and in unknown others: Evidence from ‘the Swedish experiment’
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Political Research. - : Wiley. - 0304-4130 .- 1475-6765. ; 60:3, s. 748-760
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We study how Swedish citizens updated their institutional and interpersonal trust as the corona crisis evolved from an initial phase to an acute phase in the spring of 2020. The study is based on a large web-survey panel with adult Swedes (n = 11,406) in which the same individuals were asked the same set of questions at two different time points during the coronavirus pandemic (t(0)andt(1)). The sample was self-selected but diverse (a smaller subsample, n = 1,464, was pre-stratified to be representative of the Swedish population on key demographics). We find support for the view that the corona crisis led to higher levels of institutional and interpersonal trust. Moreover, reactions were largely homogeneous across those groups that could potentially relate distantly to government authorities.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Johansson, Birgitta, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
Evaluation of dosage, safety and effects of methylphenidate on post-traumatic brain injury symptoms with a focus on mental fatigue and pain.
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Brain injury : [BI]. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1362-301X .- 0269-9052. ; 28:3, s. 304-310
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Abstract Objective: The neurobehavioural symptoms and pain following traumatic brain injury (TBI) can be long-lasting. The condition impairs the persons' ability to function in their work, studies and gatherings with family and friends. The aim of this study was to investigate dosage, safety and effects of methylphenidate on mental fatigue and pain. Methods: Twenty-nine physically-well rehabilitated TBI victims, 28 with a mild TBI and one with TBI and also with pain in the neck, shoulders and head were included in the study. Methylphenidate was tested in each patient using three treatment strategies: no medication, low dose (5 mg × 3) and normal dose (20 mg × 3) for 4 weeks using a randomized cross-over design. Results: Twenty-four patients completed the three treatment periods. Five participants discontinued, four females due to adverse reactions and one male due to attenuated motivation. Only minor adverse events were reported. Methylphenidate significantly decreased mental fatigue, as evaluated by the Mental Fatigue Scale (p < 0.001), and the effects on mental fatigue were dose-dependent. No effect on pain was detected. Conclusions: Methylphenidate decreased mental fatigue for subjects suffering a traumatic brain injury, the treatment is considered to be safe and is recommended, starting with a low dose.
|
|
