| 1. |
- Sandahl, Johan, 1974-, et al.
(författare)
-
Överdrivna slutsatser om gymnasieelevers demokratikunskaper
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Skola & Samhälle [S.O.S] Webbtidskrift. - : Föreningen Skola & Samhälle - webbtidskrift. - 2001-6727.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Rapporten från Stiftelsen Rättsfonden om gymnasieelevers kunskaper om demokrati har både metodologiska och teoretiska brister. Eftersom rapporten saknar stöd för flera av de rekommendationer som lämnas är risken att föreslagna förändringar inte gör någon skillnad eller i värsta fall leder i fel riktning, skriver Johan Sandahl med flera, alla forskare i samhällsvetenskapernas didaktik.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Michaelsen, Patrik, 1989, et al.
(författare)
-
Experiencing Nudges: Choice Autonomy, Situational Intrusion and Choice Satisfaction as Judged by People Themselves
- 2017
-
Ingår i: 38th Annual Conference of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making. Vancouver: 10-13 November 2017..
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Experimental participants made environmental choices that were either subjected to a green (Opt-out) or non-green (Opt-in) default or presented in an active choice format. In two experiments nudging generated more environmentally friendly choices without resulting in less autonomy, more intrusion or less satisfaction. Contrarily, combined evidence shows green-default participants feeling more autonomous and satisfied vs. non-green default participants. Disclosing to participants how the current presentation format may affect their choices did not change this pattern of results. Some of the charges aimed at using nudging for policy may thus be overstated – at least as judged by people themselves.
|
|
| 6. |
- Edelbring, Samuel, PhD, Docent, 1969-, et al.
(författare)
-
Should the PBL tutor be present? : A cross-sectional study of group effectiveness in synchronous and asynchronous settings
- 2020
-
Ingår i: BMC Medical Education. - : BioMed Central. - 1472-6920. ; 20:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The tutorial group and its dynamics are a cornerstone of problem-based learning (PBL). The tutor's support varies according to the setting, and it is pertinent to explore group effectiveness in relation to different settings, for example online or campus-based. The PBL groups' effectiveness can partly be assessed in terms of cognitive and motivational aspects, using a self-report tool to measure PBL group effectiveness, the Tutorial Group Effectiveness Instrument (TGEI).This study's aim was to explore tutor participation in variations of online and campus-based tutorial groups in relation to group effectiveness. A secondary aim was to validate a tool for assessing tutorial group effectiveness in a Swedish context.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with advanced-level nursing students studying to become specialised nurses or midwives at a Swedish university. The TGEI was used to measure motivational and cognitive aspects in addition to overall group effectiveness. The instrument's items were translated into Swedish and refined with an expert group and students. The responses were calculated descriptively and compared between groups using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. A psychometric evaluation was performed using the Mokken scale analysis. The subscale scores were compared between three different tutor settings: the tutor present face-to-face in the room, the tutor present online and the consultant tutor not present in the room and giving support asynchronously.Results: All the invited students (n=221) participated in the study. There were no differences in motivational or cognitive aspects between students with or without prior PBL experience, nor between men and women. Higher scores were identified on cognitive aspects (22.6, 24.6 and 21.3; p<0.001), motivational aspects (26.3, 27 and 24.5; p=002) and group effectiveness (4.1, 4.3, 3.8, p=0.02) for the two synchronously tutored groups compared to the asynchronously tutored group. The TGEI subscales showed adequate homogeneity.Conclusions: The tutor's presence is productive for PBL group effectiveness. However, the tutor need not be in the actual room but can provide support in online settings as long as the tutoring is synchronous.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Michaelsen, Patrik, 1989, et al.
(författare)
-
Experiencing default nudges: autonomy, manipulation, and choice-satisfaction as judged by people themselves
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Behavioural Public Policy. - : Cambridge University Press (CUP). - 2398-063X .- 2398-0648. ; 8:1, s. 85-106
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Criticisms of nudging suggest that nudges infringe on decision makers’ autonomy. Yet, little empirical research has explored whether people who are subjected to nudges agree. In three between-group experiments (N = 2083), we subject participants to contrasting choice architectures and measure experiences of autonomy, choice-satisfaction, perceived threat to freedom of choice, and objection to the choice architecture. Participants who received a prosocial opt-out default nudge made more prosocial choices but did not report lower autonomy or choice satisfaction than participants in opt-in default or active-choice conditions. This was the case even when the presence of the nudge was disclosed, and when monetary choice stakes were introduced. With monetary choice stakes, participants perceived the threat to freedom of choice as slightly higher in the nudge condition than in the other conditions, but objection to the choice architecture did not differ between the conditions. Taken together, our results suggest that default nudges are less manipulative and autonomy-infringing than sometimes feared. We recommend that policymakers include measures of choice experiences when testing out new interventions.
|
|
| 9. |
- Arroyo-De Dompablo, M. Elena, et al.
(författare)
-
Achievements, Challenges, and Prospects of Calcium Batteries
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Chemical Reviews. - : American Chemical Society (ACS). - 0009-2665 .- 1520-6890. ; 120:14, s. 6331-6357
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- This Review flows from past attempts to develop a (rechargeable) battery technology based on Ca via crucial breakthroughs to arrive at a comprehensive discussion of the current challenges at hand. The realization of a rechargeable Ca battery technology primarily requires identification and development of suitable electrodes and electrolytes, which is why we here cover the progress starting from the fundamental electrode/electrolyte requirements, concepts, materials, and compositions employed and finally a critical analysis of the state-of-the-art, allowing us to conclude with the particular roadblocks still existing. As for crucial breakthroughs, reversible plating and stripping of calcium at the metal-anode interface was achieved only recently and for very specific electrolyte formulations. Therefore, while much of the current research aims at finding suitable cathodes to achieve proof-of-concept for a full Ca battery, the spectrum of electrolytes researched is also expanded. Compatibility of cell components is essential, and to ensure this, proper characterization is needed, which requires design of a multitude of reliable experimental setups and sometimes methodology development beyond that of other next generation battery technologies. Finally, we conclude with recommendations for future strategies to make best use of the current advances in materials science combined with computational design, electrochemistry, and battery engineering, all to propel the Ca battery technology to reality and ultimately reach its full potential for energy storage.
|
|
| 10. |
- Edstrom, K., et al.
(författare)
-
The NordBatt Conferences: The Journey so Far and the Future Ahead
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Batteries and Supercaps. - 2566-6223. ; 6:11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- All great things have humble beginnings. In 2013 when NordBatt started, we had no lithium-ion battery manufacturing in the Nordic countries and we had rather few EVs on the roads, although things were clearly starting to move – Tesla Model S in fact topped the monthly new car sales of Norway in September that very year. Yet, even if the field was advancing and lively, relatively few Nordic research groups were doing any kind of battery R&D. Now, in 2023, almost everything is different; batteries and “electrify everything” are seen, not only by us, as the next industrial revolution – it is a topic gathering considerably many more actors in academia as well as in the whole ecosystem of batteries.
|
|
