| 1. |
- Kremer, Christine, et al.
(author)
-
European Stroke Organisation guidelines on stroke in women : Management of menopause, pregnancy and postpartum
- 2022
-
In: European Stroke Journal. - : SAGE Publications. - 2396-9873 .- 2396-9881. ; 7:2
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Pregnancy, postpartum and menopause are regarded as periods women are more vulnerable to ischaemic events. There are conflicting results regarding stroke risk and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) during menopause. Stroke in pregnancy is generally increasing with serious consequences for mother and child; therefore, recommendations for acute treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are needed. The aim of this guideline is to support and guide clinicians in treatment decisions in stroke in women. Following the “Grading of Recommendations and Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)” approach, the guidelines were developed according to the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Standard Operating Procedure. Systematic reviews and metanalyses were performed. Based on available evidence, recommendations were provided. Where there was a lack of evidence, an expert consensus statement was given. Low quality of evidence was found to suggest against the use of HRT to reduce the risk of stroke (ischaemic and haemorrhagic) in postmenopausal women. No data was available on the outcome of women with stroke when treated with HRT. No sufficient evidence was found to provide recommendations for treatment with IVT or MT during pregnancy, postpartum and menstruation. The majority of members suggested that pregnant women can be treated with IVT after assessing the benefit/risk profile on an individual basis, all members suggested treatment with IVT during postpartum and menstruation. All members suggested treatment with MT during pregnancy. The guidelines highlight the need to identify evidence for stroke prevention and acute treatment in women in more vulnerable periods of their lifetime to generate reliable data for future guidelines.
|
|
| 2. |
- Kremer, Christine, et al.
(author)
-
Sex differences in Outcome after Carotid Revascularization in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis
- 2023
-
In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. - 1097-6809. ; 78:3, s. 10-827
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- ObjectiveSex differences regarding the safety and efficacy of carotid revascularization in carotid artery stenosis have been addressed in several studies with conflicting results. Moreover, women are underrepresented in clinical trials leading to limited conclusions regarding the safety and efficacy of acute stroke treatments.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by literature search including 4 databases from January 1985 to December 2021. Sex differences in the efficacy and safety of revascularization procedures, including carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenoses were analyzed.ResultsRegarding carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, the stroke risk in men (3.6%) and women (3.9%) based on 99,495 patients (30 studies) did not differ (p=0.16). There was also no difference in the stroke risk by different time frames up to 10 years. Compared with men, women treated with CEA had a significantly higher stroke or death rate at 4 months (2 studies, 2565; 7.2% vs 5.0%; OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04-2.12; I2=0%; p=0.03), and a significantly higher rate of restenosis (1 study, 615; 17.2% vs. 6.7%; OR 2.81,95% CI 1.66-4.75; p=0.0001). For carotid stenting (CAS) in symptomatic artery stenosis data showed a non-significant tendency toward higher peri-procedural stroke in women. Whereas, for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, data based on 332,344 patients showed that women compared to men after CEA had similar rates of stroke, stroke or death and the composite outcome stroke/death/myocardial infarction. The rate of restenosis at 1 year was significantly higher in women compared to men (1 study, 372 patients; 10.8% vs 3.2%; OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.49-9.2; p=0.005).Furthermore, carotid stenting in asymptomatic patients was associated with low risk of a postprocedural stroke in both sexes, but a significantly higher risk of in-hospital myocardial infarction in women than men (8445 patients, 1.2% vs. 0.6%, OR 2.01, 95%CI 1.23-3.28, I2=0%, p=0.005).ConclusionsA few sex-differences in short term outcomes after carotid revascularization for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis were found, although there were no significant differences in the overall stroke. This indicates a need for larger multicenter prospective studies to evaluate these sex-specific differences. More women, including those aged over 80 years, need to be enrolled in RCTs, to better understand if sex differences exist and to tailor carotid revascularization accordingly.
|
|
