| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Berg, J, et al.
(author)
-
Health-related quality of life and long-term morbidity and mortality in patients hospitalised with systolic heart failure
- 2014
-
In: JRSM cardiovascular disease. - : SAGE Publications. - 2048-0040. ; 3, s. 2048004014548735-
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Health-related quality of life has been shown to impact prognosis in chronic heart failure, however with limited long-term follow-up. We analysed data spanning 8–12 years to assess the impact of health-related quality of life using the Nottingham Health Profile on first hospitalisation and mortality, for cardiovascular and all causes. Methods We included 208 patients aged ≥60 years with New York Heart Association class II–IV and left ventricular systolic dysfunction hospitalised in Stockholm during 1996–99. Data on hospital admissions, discharge diagnoses and date and cause of death were collected from administrative databases and medical records until 2007. Cox proportional hazard models were employed to analyse the time to event for mortality and hospitalisations. Results Mean age was 76 years, 58% were male and mean ejection fraction was 34%. Median survival was 4.6 years (range 6 days–11.9 years); 148 patients died. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality were determined by physical mobility (by Nottingham Health Profile), age, gender, diuretic dose and haemoglobin level. Glomerular filtration rate was significant for all-cause mortality, while atrioventricular plane displacement was predictive of cardiovascular mortality. Median time to first all-cause and cardiovascular hospitalisation was 5.7 and 11.2 months, respectively. Time to first all-cause hospitalisation was determined by physical mobility, emotional reactions, age, gender and haemoglobin level, while only physical mobility and diuretic dose predicted time to first cardiovascular hospitalisation. Conclusions In conclusion, in patients with systolic chronic heart failure, physical mobility as part of health-related quality of life is an independent prognostic marker for cardiovascular and all-cause readmissions and mortality over 12 years.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Lindgren, P., et al.
(author)
-
Cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin for the prevention of coronary and stroke events: an economic analysis of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial--lipid-lowering arm (ASCOT-LLA)
- 2005
-
In: Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1741-8267. ; 12:1, s. 29-36
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of the lipid-lowering arm of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT-LLA) where patients from seven countries with hypertension and no history of coronary heart disease (CHD) were randomized to receive 10 mg atorvastatin or placebo. DESIGN: Economic analysis of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Data on resource use were aggregated for all patients during the entire trial period (median 3.3 years) and multiplied with unit costs for Sweden and the UK. The total number of cardiovascular events and procedures avoided was used as the measure of effectiveness. RESULTS: Patients treated with atorvastatin had an additional net costs of 449 euro (4114 SEK) in Sweden and 414 euro (260 pounds sterling) in the UK, but fewer events per patient (0.097 compared to 0.132). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 12673 euro (116119 SEK) and 11693 euro (7349 pounds sterling) per event avoided. CONCLUSION: Based on comparisons with the WOSCOPS and 4S studies, atorvastatin at 10 mg to treat patients as in the ASCOT study, appears to be a cost-effective strategy.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
