| 1. |
- Rozental, Alexander, et al.
(author)
-
Consensus statement on defining and measuring negative effects of Internet interventions
- 2014
-
In: Internet Interventions. - : Elsevier BV. - 2214-7829. ; 1:1, s. 12-19
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Internet interventions have great potential for alleviating emotional distress, promoting mental health, and enhancing well-being. Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated their efficacy for a number of psychiatric conditions, and interventions delivered via the Internet will likely become a common alternative to face-to-face treatment. Meanwhile, research has paid little attention to the negative effects associated with treatment, warranting further investigation of the possibility that some patients might deteriorate or encounter adverse events despite receiving best available care. Evidence from research of face-to-face treatment suggests that negative effects afflict 5–10% of all patients undergoing treatment in terms of deterioration. However, there is currently a lack of consensus on how to define and measure negative effects in psychotherapy research in general, leaving researchers without practical guidelines for monitoring and reporting negative effects in clinical trials. The current paper therefore seeks to provide recommendations that could promote the study of negative effects in Internet interventions with the aim of increasing the knowledge of its occurrence and characteristics. Ten leading experts in the field of Internet interventions were invited to participate and share their perspective on how to explore negative effects, using the Delphi technique to facilitate a dialog and reach an agreement. The authors discuss the importance of conducting research on negative effects in order to further the understanding of its incidence and different features. Suggestions on how to classify and measure negative effects in Internet interventions are proposed, involving methods from both quantitative and qualitative research. Potential mechanisms underlying negative effects are also discussed, differentiating common factors shared with face-to-face treatments from those unique to treatments delivered via the Internet. The authors conclude that negative effects are to be expected and need to be acknowledged to a greater extent, advising researchers to systematically probe for negative effects whenever conducting clinical trials involving Internet interventions, as well as to share their findings in scientific journals.
|
|
| 2. |
- Smoktunowicz, Ewelina, et al.
(author)
-
Consensus statement on the problem of terminology in psychological interventions using the internet or digital components
- 2020
-
In: Internet Interventions. - : Elsevier. - 2214-7829. ; 21, s. 1-8
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Since the emergence of psychological interventions delivered via the Internet they have differed in numerous ways. The wealth of formats, methods, and technological solutions has led to increased availability and cost-effectiveness of clinical care, however, it has simultaneously generated a multitude of terms. With this paper, we first aim to establish whether a terminology issue exists in the field of Internet-delivered psychological interventions. If so, we aim to determine its implications for research, education, and practice. Furthermore, we intend to discuss solutions to mitigate the problem; in particular, we propose the concept of a common glossary. We invited 23 experts in the field of Internet-delivered interventions to respond to four questions, and employed the Delphi method to facilitate a discussion. We found that experts overwhelmingly agreed that there were terminological challenges, and that it had significant consequences for conducting research, treating patients, educating students, and informing the general public about Internet-delivered interventions. A cautious agreement has been reached that formulating a common glossary would be beneficial for the field to address the terminology issue. We end with recommendations for the possible formats of the glossary and means to disseminate it in a way that maximizes the probability of broad acceptance for a variety of stakeholders.
|
|
| 3. |
- Carlbring, Per, et al.
(author)
-
Consensus statement on defining and measuring negative effects of Internet interventions
- 2014
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Internet interventions have great potential for alleviating emotional distress, promoting mental health, and enhancing well-being. Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated their effectiveness for a number of psychiatric conditions, and interventions delivered via the Internet will likely become a common alternative to face-to-face treatment. Meanwhile, research has paid little attention to the negative effects associated with treatment, warranting further investigation of the possibility that some patients might deteriorate or encounter adverse events despite receiving best available care. Evidence from research of face-to-face treatment suggests that negative effects afflict 5-10% of all patients undergoing treatment in terms of deterioration.Objective: There is currently a lack of consensus on how to define and measure negative effects in psychotherapy research in general, leaving researchers without practical guidelines for monitoring and reporting negative effects in clinical trials. The current study therefore sought out to provide recommendations that could promote the study of negative effects in Internet interventions with the aim of increasing the knowledge of its occurrence and characteristics.Methods: Ten experts in the field of Internet interventions were invited to participate and share their perspective on how to explore negative effects, using the Delphi technique to facilitate a dialogue and reach an agreement. The authors discuss the importance of conducting research on negative effects in order to further the understanding of its incidence and different features.Results: Suggestions on how to classify and measure negative effects in Internet interventions are proposed, involving methods from both quantitative and qualitative research. Potential mechanisms underlying negative effects are also discussed, differentiating common factors shared with face-to-face treatments from those unique to treatments delivered via the Internet.Conclusions: We conclude that negative effects are to be expected and need to be acknowledged to a greater extent, advising researchers to systematically probe for negative effects whenever conducting clinical trials involving Internet interventions, as well as to share their findings in scientific journals.
|
|
| 4. |
- Rozental, Alexander, et al.
(author)
-
Consensus statement on defining and measuring negative effects of Internet interventions
- 2014
-
In: Oral Abstracts from the 7th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Research on Internet Interventions. ; , s. 39-39
-
Conference paper (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Purpose: Internet interventions provide a potential for promoting mental health and alleviating emotional distress. A large number of clinical trials have demonstrated their efficacy for several psychiatric conditions, and Internet interventions will likely become a common and valuable alternative within the regular health care. In the meantime, research has paid little attention to the possibility that some treatments might be associated with different types of negative effects. Evidence from face-to-face treatments suggests that 5-10% of all patients deteriorate despite receiving best available care. In addition, other forms of negative effects may exist as well, e.g., social stigmatization, interpersonal difficulties, and decreased self-esteem. However, a lack of agreement on how to define and measure negative effects has left researchers without practical guidelines for monitoring and reporting deterioration and adverse events in clinical trials, warranting a consensus for conducting research on negative effects.Method: The objective of the current paper is to provide recommendations that could promote the study of negative effects in Internet interventions. Ten leading experts in the field of Internet interventions were invited to participate and share their perspective on how to explore negative effects, using the Delphi technique to facilitate a dialogue and reach an agreement.Results: The importance of conducting further research on negative effects is discussed, and suggestions on how to classify and measure negative effects are provided, involving methods from quantitative and qualitative research. Potential mechanisms underlying negative effects are also presented, differentiating factors shared with face-to-face treatments from those unique to treatments delivered via the Internet.Conclusion: Negative effects should be expected and need to be recognized to a greater extent, and researchers are advised to systematically probe for negative effects whenever conducting clinical trials involving Internet interventions, as well as to share their findings in scientific journals.
|
|
| 5. |
- Titov, Nickolai, et al.
(author)
-
ICBT in routine care : A descriptive analysis of successful clinics in five countries
- 2018
-
In: Internet Interventions. - : Elsevier. - 2214-7829. ; 13, s. 108-115
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of internet delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) for anxiety and depression. However, relatively little is known about the context, operations, and outcomes of ICBT when administered as part of routine care. This paper describes the setting, relationship to existing health services, procedures for referral, assessment, treatment, patients and outcomes of ICBT clinics in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Canada and Australia. All five clinics provide services free or at low cost to patients. All have systems of governance to monitor quality of care, patient safety, therapist performance and data security. All five clinics include initial assessments by clinicians and between 10 and 20 min of therapist support during each week. Published reports of outcomes all demonstrate large clinical improvement, low rates of deterioration, and high levels of patient satisfaction. Services that require a face to face assessment treat smaller numbers of patients and have fewer patients from remote locations. The paper shows that therapist-guided ICBT can be a valuable part of mental health services for anxiety and depression. Important components of successful ICBT services are rigorous governance to maintain a high standard of clinical care, and the measurement and reporting of outcomes.
|
|
