| 1. |
- Kroeze, E., et al.
(författare)
-
Pediatric Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Malignancies: From Extramedullary to Medullary Involvement
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Cancers. - : MDPI AG. - 2072-6694. ; 14:16
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Simple Summary B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (BCP-LBL) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) are both malignancies of immature B-cells. However, BCP-ALL has been extensively studied and treatment protocols have changed over the last decades, whereas BCP-LBL is quite rare, and treatment has stayed roughly the same. In this retrospective study, we compare the clinical characteristics of a cohort of BCP-LBL patients to a cohort BCP-ALL patients. With the comparison of this unique large cohort of immature B-cell malignancies, we aim to contribute to elucidating whether BCP-LBL and BCP-ALL represent two diseases, or different representations of the same disease. Increasing the understanding of BCP-LBL in comparison to BCP-ALL is crucial for improving treatment and prognosis for BCP-LBL. B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (BCP-LBL) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) are the malignant counterparts of immature B-cells. BCP-ALL is the most common hematological malignancy in childhood, while BCP-LBL accounts for only 1% of all hematological malignancies in children. Therefore, BCP-ALL has been well studied and treatment protocols have changed over the last decades, whereas treatment for BCP-LBL has stayed roughly the same. Clinical characteristics of 364 pediatric patients with precursor B-cell malignancies were studied, consisting of BCP-LBL (n = 210) and BCP-ALL (n = 154) patients. Our results indicate that based on the clinical presentation of disease, B-cell malignancies probably represent a spectrum ranging from complete isolated medullary disease to apparent complete extramedullary disease. Hepatosplenomegaly and peripheral blood involvement are the most important discriminators, as both seen in 80% and 95% of the BCP-ALL patients and in 2% of the BCP-LBL patients, respectively. In addition, we show that the overall survival rates in this cohort differ significantly between BCP-LBL and BCP-ALL patients aged 1-18 years (p = 0.0080), and that the outcome for infants (0-1 years) with BCP-LBL is significantly decreased compared to BCP-LBL patients of all other pediatric ages (p < 0.0001).
|
|
| 2. |
- Parma, L., et al.
(författare)
-
Bis(maltolato)oxovanadium(IV) Induces Angiogenesis via Phosphorylation of VEGFR2
- 2020
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Molecular Sciences. - : MDPI AG. - 1422-0067. ; 21:13
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- VEGFR2 and VEGF-A play a pivotal role in the process of angiogenesis. VEGFR2 activation is regulated by protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), enzymes that dephosphorylate the receptor and reduce angiogenesis. We aim to study the effect of PTPs blockade using bis(maltolato)oxovanadium(IV) (BMOV) on in vivo wound healing and in vitro angiogenesis. BMOV significantly improves in vivo wound closure by 45% in C57BL/6JRj mice. We found that upon VEGFR2 phosphorylation induced by endogenously produced VEGF-A, the addition of BMOV results in increased cell migration (45%), proliferation (40%) and tube formation (27%) in HUVECs compared to control. In a mouse ex vivo, aortic ring assay BMOV increased the number of sprouts by 3 folds when compared to control. However, BMOV coadministered with exogenous VEGF-A increased ECs migration, proliferation and tube formation by only 41%, 18% and 12% respectively and aortic ring sprouting by only 1-fold. We also found that BMOV enhances VEGFR2 Y951 and p38MAPK phosphorylation, but not ERK1/2. The level of phosphorylation of these residues was the same in the groups treated with BMOV supplemented with exogenous VEGF-A and exogenous VEGF-A only. Our study demonstrates that BMOV is able to enhance wound closure in vivo. Moreover, in the presence of endogenous VEGF-A, BMOV is able to stimulate in vitro angiogenesis by increasing the phosphorylation of VEGFR2 and its downstream proangiogenic enzymes. Importantly, BMOV had a stronger proangiogenic effect compared to its effect in coadministration with exogenous VEGF-A.
|
|
