SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Patel Manesh R) ;pers:(Erlinge David)"

Sökning: WFRF:(Patel Manesh R) > Erlinge David

  • Resultat 1-2 av 2
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Berntorp, Karolina, et al. (författare)
  • Instantaneous wave-free ratio compared with fractional flow reserve in PCI : A cost-minimization analysis
  • 2021
  • Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Hindawi Publishing Corporation. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 344, s. 54-59
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • BACKGROUND: Coronary physiology is a routine diagnostic tool when assessing whether coronary revascularization is indicated. The iFR-SWEDEHEART trial demonstrated similar clinical outcomes when using instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide revascularization. The objective of this analysis was to assess a cost-minimization analysis of iFR-guided compared with FFR-guided revascularization.METHODS: In this cost-minimization analysis we used a decision-tree model from a healthcare perspective with a time-horizon of one year to estimate the cost difference between iFR and FFR in a Nordic setting and a United States (US) setting. Treatment pathways and health care utilizations were constructed from the iFR-SWEDEHEART trial. Unit cost for revascularization and myocardial infarction in the Nordic setting and US setting were derived from the Nordic diagnosis-related group versus Medicare cost data. Unit cost of intravenous adenosine administration and cost per stent placed were based on the average costs from the enrolled centers in the iFR-SWEDEHEART trial. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out to test the robustness of the result.RESULTS: The cost-minimization analysis demonstrated a cost saving per patient of $681 (95% CI: $641 - $723) in the Nordic setting and $1024 (95% CI: $934 - $1114) in the US setting, when using iFR-guided compared with FFR-guided revascularization. The results were not sensitive to changes in uncertain parameters or assumptions.CONCLUSIONS: IFR-guided revascularization is associated with significant savings in cost compared with FFR-guided revascularization.
  •  
2.
  • Escaned, Javier, et al. (författare)
  • Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes
  • 2018
  • Ingår i: JACC. - : Elsevier. - 1936-8798 .- 1876-7605. ; 11:15, s. 1437-1449
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients deferred from coronary revascularization on the basis of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in stable angina pectoris (SAP) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND Assessment of coronary stenosis severity with pressure guidewires is recommended to determine the need for myocardial revascularization. METHODS The safety of deferral of coronary revascularization in the pooled per-protocol population (n = 4,486) of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularisation) and iFR-SWEDEHEART (Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris or Acute Coronary Syndrome) randomized clinical trials was investigated. Patients were stratified according to revascularization decision making on the basis of iFR or FFR and to clinical presentation (SAP or ACS). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization at 1 year. RESULTS Coronary revascularization was deferred in 2,130 patients. Deferral was performed in 1,117 patients (50%) in the iFR group and 1,013 patients (45%) in the FFR group (p < 0.01). At 1 year, the MACE rate in the deferred population was similar between the iFR and FFR groups (4.12% vs. 4.05%; fully adjusted hazard ratio: 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.72 to 1.79; p = 0.60). A clinical presentation with ACS was associated with a higher MACE rate compared with SAP in deferred patients (5.91% vs. 3.64% in ACS and SAP, respectively; fully adjusted hazard ratio: 0.61 in favor of SAP; 95% confidence interval: 0.38 to 0.99; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Overall, deferral of revascularization is equally safe with both iFR and FFR, with a low MACE rate of about 4%. Lesions were more frequently deferred when iFR was used to assess physiological significance. In deferred patients presenting with ACS, the event rate was significantly increased compared with SAP at 1 year. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-2 av 2
Typ av publikation
tidskriftsartikel (2)
Typ av innehåll
refereegranskat (2)
Författare/redaktör
Fröbert, Ole, 1964- (2)
Götberg, Matthias (2)
Christiansen, Evald ... (2)
Patel, Manesh R. (2)
Olsson, Hans (1)
visa fler...
Omerovic, Elmir, 196 ... (1)
Petraco, Ricardo (1)
Bhindi, Ravinay (1)
Koul, Sasha (1)
Serruys, Patrick (1)
Sen, Sayan (1)
Al-Lamee, Rasha (1)
Escaned, Javier (1)
van Royen, Niels (1)
Piek, Jan J. (1)
Jensen, Jens (1)
Erglis, Andrejs (1)
Jakobsen, Lars (1)
Bertilsson, Maria (1)
Di Mario, Carlo (1)
Omerovic, Elmir (1)
Yndigegn, Troels (1)
Berntorp, Karolina (1)
Sandhall, Lennart (1)
Matsuo, Hitoshi (1)
Carlsson, Jörg (1)
Persson, Josefine, 1 ... (1)
Tanaka, Nobuhiro (1)
van Belle, Eric (1)
Janssens, Luc (1)
Koul, Sasha M. (1)
Gudmundsdottir, Ingi ... (1)
Dehbi, Hakim Moulay (1)
Birgander, Mats (1)
Hellig, Farrel (1)
Brugaletta, Salvator ... (1)
Maeng, Michael (1)
Laine, Mika (1)
Calais, Fredrik (1)
Mejía-Rentería, Hern ... (1)
Davies, Justin E. (1)
Varenhorst, Christop ... (1)
Danielewicz, Mikael (1)
Lindroos, Pontus (1)
Hauer, Dario (1)
Karlsson, Ann-Charlo ... (1)
Jeremias, Allen (1)
Krackhardt, Florian (1)
Ryan, Nicola (1)
visa färre...
Lärosäte
Örebro universitet (2)
Lunds universitet (2)
Göteborgs universitet (1)
Uppsala universitet (1)
Linköpings universitet (1)
Linnéuniversitetet (1)
visa fler...
Karolinska Institutet (1)
visa färre...
Språk
Engelska (2)
Forskningsämne (UKÄ/SCB)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap (2)

År

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy