| 1. |
- Gyllensten, Hanna, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
Cost of illness of patient-reported adverse drug events: a population-based cross-sectional survey.
- 2013
-
Ingår i: BMJ open. - : BMJ. - 2044-6055. ; 3:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To estimate the cost of illness (COI) of individuals with self-reported adverse drug events (ADEs) from a societal perspective and to compare these estimates with the COI for individuals without ADE. Furthermore, to estimate the direct costs resulting from two ADE categories, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and subtherapeutic effects of medication therapy (STE).
|
|
| 2. |
- Gyllensten, Hanna, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
Economic Impact of Adverse Drug Events – A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study of 4970 Adults
- 2014
-
Ingår i: PLoS ONE. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1932-6203. ; 9:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background The aim was to estimate the direct costs caused by ADEs, including costs for dispensed drugs, primary care, other outpatient care, and inpatient care, and to relate the direct costs caused by ADEs to the societal COI (direct and indirect costs), for patients with ADEs and for the entire study population. Methods We conducted a population-based observational retrospective cohort study of ADEs identified from medical records. From a random sample of 5025 adults in a Swedish county council, 4970 were included in the analyses. During a three-month study period in 2008, direct and indirect costs were estimated from resource use identified in the medical records and from register data on costs for resource use. Results Among 596 patients with ADEs, the average direct costs per patient caused by ADEs were USD 444.9 [95% CI: 264.4 to 625.3], corresponding to USD 21 million per 100 000 adult inhabitants per year. Inpatient care accounted for 53.9% of all direct costs caused by ADEs. For patients with ADEs, the average societal cost of illness was USD 6235.0 [5442.8 to 7027.2], of which direct costs were USD 2830.1 [2260.7 to 3399.4] (45%), and indirect costs USD 3404.9 [2899.3 to 3910.4] (55%). The societal cost of illness was higher for patients with ADEs compared to other patients. ADEs caused 9.5% of all direct healthcare costs in the study population. Conclusions Healthcare costs for patients with ADEs are substantial across different settings; in primary care, other outpatient care and inpatient care. Hence the economic impact of ADEs will be underestimated in studies focusing on inpatient ADEs alone. Moreover, the high proportion of indirect costs in the societal COI for patients with ADEs suggests that the observed costs caused by ADEs would be even higher if including indirect costs. Additional studies are needed to identify interventions to prevent and manage ADEs.
|
|
| 3. |
- Hakkarainen, K M, et al.
(författare)
-
Prevalence, nature and potential preventability of adverse drug events - A population-based medical record study of 4970 adults
- 2014
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. - : Wiley-Blackwell. - 0306-5251 .- 1365-2125. ; 78:1, s. 170-183
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: To estimate the 3-month prevalence of adverse drug events (ADEs), categories of ADEs, and preventable ADEs, and the preventability of ADEs among adults in Sweden. Further, to identify drug classes and organ systems associated with ADEs and estimate their seriousness.METHODS: A random sample of 5025 adults in Swedish county council in 2008 was drawn from the Total Population Register. All their medical records in 29 inpatient care departments in three hospitals, 110 specialised outpatient clinics, and 51 primary care units were reviewed retrospectively in a stepwise manner, and complemented with register data on dispensed drugs. ADEs, including adverse drug reactions (ADRs), sub-therapeutic effects of drug therapy (STEs), drug dependence and abuse, drug intoxications from overdose, and morbidities due to drug-related untreated indication, were detected during a 3-month study period, and assessed for preventability.RESULTS: Among included 4970 individuals, the prevalence of ADEs was 12.0% (95% confidence interval 11.1-12.9%), and preventable ADEs 5.6% (5.0-6.2%). ADRs (6.9%; 6.2-7.6%) and STEs (6.4%; 5.8-7.1%) were more prevalent than the other ADEs. Of the ADEs, 38.8% (35.8-41.9%) was preventable, varying by ADE category and seriousness. ADEs were frequently associated with nervous system and cardiovascular drugs, but the associated drugs and affected organs varied by ADE category.CONCLUSIONS: The considerable burden of ADEs and preventable ADEs from commonly used drugs across care settings warrants large-scale efforts to redesign safer, higher quality healthcare systems. The heterogeneous nature of the ADE categories should be considered in research and clinical practice for preventing, detecting and mitigating ADEs.
|
|
