| 1. |
- Bayati, Shaghayegh
(författare)
-
Autoantibody profiling in autoimmune diseases
- 2023
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Autoimmune disease diagnosis and definition of prognosis can be challenging. Patients with the same autoimmune disease could present with very heterogeneous symptoms. Therefore, there is a need to understand the disease better to improve patients’ diagnosis, and classification, and tailor the treatment. Autoantibodies are a hallmark of many autoimmune diseases. They are antibodies produced by B cells and targeting self-antigens. Autoantibodies could be useful as diagnostic and prognostic markers of autoimmune disease.Protein arrays enable multiplex and high-throughput profiling of autoantibodies, therefore representing a good tool for autoantibody markers discovery and validation. This thesis presents the work performed to study autoantibodies in ANCA Associated Vasculitis (AAV) and Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) by employing planar and bead-based antigen arrays. Moreover, this thesis also includes the work done to optimize the application of a multiplex serology assay for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in saliva.In paper 1, we aimed to perform a broad autoantibody profiling in serum samples of AAV patients to search for new autoantibodies associated with the disease or disease subgroups and activity. The main result is related to the identification of anti-KIF5C antibodies at high prevalence in anti-MPO-positive patients and patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Anti-KIF4A also showed a higher prevalence in anti-MPO positive and MPA patients.In Paper 2 an in-depth autoantibody profiling was performed to identify autoantibodies as candidates for future relapse prediction in the plasma of AAV patients. We tested samples from patients classified as long-term remission-off-therapy (LTROT) and patients suffering future flares. Nine autoantibodies were found with higher reactivity in the relapse group. Among these, anti-ATF3 antibodies had increased reactivity in patients with kidney and ENT symptoms.In paper 3, plasma samples from SSc patients and controls were tested to detect autoantibodies associated with fibrosis. We identified eleven autoantibodies with increased prevalence in patients with systemic sclerosis compared to the control group. Eight of these autoantibodies are new in the context of systemic sclerosis and all bind to proteins that are involved in fibrosis. Among these, the anti-AKT3 was shown to be more reactive in patients with skin and lung fibrosis and anti-PIP4K2B in patients that were negative for the available diagnostic marker.Finally, in paper 4, a multiplex bead-based array serological assay was optimized to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2–specific IgG and IgA in saliva samples. This method was developed to measure antibodies, using SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins.In conclusion, the described work shows the application of the protein array technology to identify (auto)antibodies in different body fluids and within autoimmune diseases and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, we have identified autoantibody targets that are worth further investigation for their usefulness in better understanding some autoimmune conditions.
|
|
| 2. |
- Frodlund, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Predictors Of Antibody Response To Covid-19 Vaccine In Rituximab Treated Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases. A Swedish Nationwide Study (Covid19-Reuma)
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 81, s. 368-369
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In line with other reports, our group showed that patients treated with rituximab had significant impaired antibody response compared to patients treated with other biologic and targeted and synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD).ObjectivesTo investigate predictors of response to COVID-19 vaccination (2 doses of mRNA vaccines, 2 doses of virus vector vaccines or combinations of these) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) treated with rituximab and controls.MethodsAntibody levels to three antigens: Spike protein full length, Spike S1 and Nucleocapsid C-terminal fragment (to confirm previous COVID-19 infection) were measured in sera collected before vaccination and 2-12 weeks after the second vaccine using a multiplex bead-based serology assay. The antigen-specific cut-off was defined as the median fluorescence intensity signal plus 6x standard deviations across 12 pre-pandemic controls. A good vaccine response was defined as having antibodies over the cut-off level for both spike antigens. Proportion (%) responders was compared between patients and controls (Chi2 test).Patients with IRD receiving last rituximab treatment within a mean (range) 193 (23-501) days before first vaccination participated. Individuals without IRD served as a control group. Predictors of a good vaccine response were explored using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, disease duration, diagnosis (systemic vasculitis/RA/JIA/other), concomitant csDMARD, rituximab dose and prednisolone dose. Hazard ratio (chanse) of a good antibody response in relation to time between the last rituximab treatment and vaccination was studied by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.ResultsIn total, 145 patients receiving rituximab and 61 controls were inclyded. Of these, 82 received rituximab as monotherapy (67% women; mean age 66 years, mean disease duration 13 years; 33% had RA/JIA and 60% vasculitis) and 63 received rituximab+csDMARD (62% women; mean age 66 years; mean disease duration 17 years; 76% had RA/JIA and 10 % vasculitis). Controls (n=61) were 74% women and mean age 49 years. Compared to controls, rituximab patients had lower antibody levels for both spike proteins (p<0.001). Proportion (%) responders among patients receiving rituximab as monotherapy (40.2%) and rituximab+DMARDs (25.4%) was significantly lower than in controls (98.4%) (p<0.001, Chi2). Higher age, concomitant csDMARD at vaccination and shorter time from last rituximab treatment predicted impaired antibody response (multivariate logistic regression model) (Table 1). Longer time between the last rituximab course and vaccination was associated with better antibody response (Figure 1).Table 1.Predictors of good antibody response to two doses of COVID-19 vaccine defined as antibodies over the cut-off level for both spike antigensBp-valueOR95% CIAge at vaccination (years)-0.040.0090.960.93-0.99Sex (male/female)-9.550.2090.580.24-1.36csDMARD at vaccination (yes/no)-1.080.0260.340.13-0.88Prednisolone (mg/dag)-0.100.1030.900.80-1.02Rituximab dos (1000 mg vs 500 mg)-0.010.3700.990.99-1.00Time between the last rituximab and vaccination (months)0.200.0011.311.11-1.55Diagnosis at vaccination (systemic vasculitis vs others)-0.510.3150.600.21-1.64Figure 1.The chance of good antibody response following two doses of COVID-19 vaccine in relation to time between the last rituximab course and vaccination.ConclusionPatients with IRD getting vaccinated with two doses of COVID19 vaccine during the treatment with rituximab have the ability to develop antibody response although the response is impaired. For each month passed after the last rituximab course, the chance of good antibody response increases with 30%. Younger patients receiving rituximab as monotherapy and vaccinated preferably several months after the last rituximab treatment have the highest chance of achieving a good antibody response.AcknowledgementsUnrestricted research grants have been received from Roche and starting grants from The Swedish Rheumatism AssociationDisclosure of InterestsMartina Frodlund: None declared, Katerina Chatzidionysiou Consultant of: consultancy fees from Eli Lilly, AbbVie and Pfizer., Anna Södergren: None declared, Eva Klingberg: None declared, Monika Hansson: None declared, Elisa Pin: None declared, Sophie Olsson: None declared, Anders Bengtsson: None declared, Lars Klareskog Grant/research support from: has eceived research grants from Pfizer, BMS, Affibody, Sonoma Biotherapeutics, Meliha C Kapetanovic Consultant of: have received consultancy fees from Abbvie, Pfizer and GSK, Grant/research support from: have received unrestricted research grants from Roche and Pfizer
|
|
| 3. |
- Frodlund, M., et al.
(författare)
-
The impact of immunomodulating treatment on the serological immunogenicity following three doses of covid-19 vaccine and persistence of immunogenicity of two vaccine doses in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases - a swedish study (covid19-reuma)
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 82, s. 533-533
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background Data on serological immunity after three doses and the long-term immunogenicity (persistence) of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) treated with different immunomodulating drugs are still limited.Objectives To elucidate if 1) a third dose COVID-19 vaccine improves antibody responses, compared to two doses, in patients with IRD treated with biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD (b/tsDMARDs) treatment given as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) compared to controls, and 2) the persistence of antibody response after two doses of COVID-19 vaccine in IRD patients.Methods Antibody levels to two antigens representing Spike full length protein and Spike S1 and a Nucleocapsid C-terminal fragment (used to confirm previous COVID-19 infection) were measured in serum samples collected 2-12 and 21-40 weeks after the second vaccine dose and 2-12 weeks after the third dose using a multiplex bead-based serology assay. A sufficient antibody response (seropositivity) was defined as having antibodies over the cut-off level for both spike antigens (1). WT (wild type) anti-Spike IgG and omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants were measured. Patients with IRD receiving immunomodulating treatment, regularly followed at a rheumatology department and a group of controls were recruited from five Swedish region.Results In total, 323 of 414 patients with IRD and 36 controls who received three vaccine doses participated in this part of the study. Following treatment groups were included: rituximab (n=118; 68% female; mean age 67 years), abatacept (n=18; 72% female; mean age 64 years), IL6r inhibitors (n=60; 73% female; mean age 64 years), JAK-inhibitors (n=44; 80% female, mean age 52 years), TNF-inhibitors (n=59; 70% female; mean age 47 years;), IL12/23/17 inhibitors (n=24; 46% female; mean age 54 years) and controls (n=36; 75% female, mean age 51 years). b/ts DMARD treatment was given as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARD, methotrexate (MTX) being the most frequently used csDMARD (32.5%). Compared to results after two vaccine doses, proportion (%) of seropositivity after three vaccine doses increased significantly in groups rituximab +/- DMARD (p=0.003 and p=0.004, respectively), IL6r inhibitors +DMARD (p=0.02), and abatacept+DMARD (p=0.01). However, the proportion of seropositivity after three vaccine doses was still significantly lower in rituximab treated patients (52%) compared to other treatment groups or controls (p<0.001) (Figure 1A/B). Antibody response to WT, omicron sBA.1 and sBA.2 showed similar pattern with the lowest levels among patients treated with rituximab.When antibody response was compared between 2-12 weeks and 21-40 weeks after second dose, the proportion of seropositive rituximab treated patients decreased from 34.9 % to 32.6%. All patients with JAK inhibitors and with JAK-inhibitors and IL6r-inhibitors seropositive 21-40 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Patients treated with other bDMARDs were not included in this analysis due to limited number participants.Conclusion In this Swedish study including IRD patients receiving different b/t DMARDs, a sufficient immunogenicity of the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine was observed in all treatments with exception for rituximab. However, the increased proportion of seropositivity after the third COVID-19 vaccine doses in rituximab and other patients with insufficient response to two doses including response to the omicron variants, supports the current recommendations on additional booster doses. The immunogenicity of two vaccine doses was preserved to 40 weeks in majority of patients treated with different immunomodulating treatment with exception for rituximab.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Lourido, L., et al.
(författare)
-
PRESENCE OF FOUR SERUM AUTOANTIBODIES ASSOCIATES WITH THE ACPA STATUS IN EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 80, s. 425-426
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) is a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that precede the development of the disease by years and is used for its clinical diagnosis. However, there are RA subjects that test negative for ACPA and thus the early diagnosis on these patients may be delayed. Furthermore, the presence or absence of ACPA in RA supports the hypothesis that on these two subsets of patients underlie different pathogenesis and clinical outcomes.Objectives:In this work, we searched for serum autoantibodies useful to assist the early diagnosis of ACPA-seronegative RA and its management.Methods:We profiled the serum autoantibody repertoire of 80 ACPA-seronegative and 80 ACPA-seropositive RA subjects from the Swedish population-based Epidemiological Investigation of RA (EIRA) cohort. A suspension bead array platform built on protein fragments within Human Protein Atlas and selected from an initial untargeted screening using arrays containing 2660 total antigens was employed to identify IgG and IgA serum autoantibodies. A validation phase on antigen suspension bead arrays was carried out on another set of samples from EIRA containing 386 ACPA-seropositive, 358 ACPA-seronegative and 372 randomly selected control subjects of the same age and sex. A sample-specific threshold based on 20 times the median absolute deviation plus the median of all signals was selected to determine the reactivity of samples. The Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher’s test were applied for the comparison of autoantibody levels and reactivity frequencies between the groups.Results:Our data revealed four antigens associated with the ACPA status (Table 1). Testis-specific Y-encoded-like protein 4 (TSPYL4) showed significantly higher IgG reactivity frequency in ACPA-seronegative subjects compared to ACPA-seropositive (8% vs. 3%; P<0.05). Significant differences at IgG autoantibody levels (P<0.05) were also observed between ACPA-seronegative subjects and controls for this specific antigen. Significantly higher IgG autoantibody levels (P<0.05) towards another antigen, dual specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 6 (MAP2K6), were also observed in ACPA-seronegative subjects compared to ACPA-seropositive and controls. In contrast, we found significantly higher IgG autoantibody levels (P<0.05) in ACPA-seropositive individuals compared to ACPA-seronegative and controls towards two antigens, anosmin-1 (ANOS-1) and muscle related coiled-coil protein (MURC). ANOS-1 shows also significantly higher IgG reactivity frequency in ACPA-seropositive individuals compared to ACPA-seronegative and controls (22%, 9% and 6% respectively; P<0.05). Interestingly, three out of the four antigens discovered to be associated with the ACPA status in early RA are highly expressed in lungs and heart, two of the main extraarticular sites affected in RA. No significant differences were observed at IgA levels for any of the antigens analyzed.Table 1.Scheme of the different phases of the study, the features within each phase and the results. The reactivity to four antigens allows to distinguish ACPA-seronegative (ACPA-), ACPA seropositive (ACPA+) and controls.PhasesUntargeteddiscoveryTargeteddiscoveryTargetedvalidationNumber of samples80 ACPA-80 ACPA-358 ACPA-372 Controls80 ACPA+80 ACPA+386 ACPA+Antigen arrayplatformPlanararraysSuspensionbead array 1Suspensionbead array 2Number of antigens26606227Number of candidatebiomarkers6227 4 (TSPYL4,MAP2K6,ANOS1,MURC)Conclusion:Upon further validation in other early RA sample cohorts, our data suggest the measurement of these four autoantibodies may be useful for the early diagnosis of ACPA-seronegative RA and give insight into the pathogenesis of the different RA subsets.Characters from table content including title and footnotes:Disclosure of Interests:None declared
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
