1. |
|
|
2. |
- Hohenschurz-Schmidt, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Recommendations for the development, implementation, and reporting of control interventions in efficacy and mechanistic trials of physical, psychological, and self-management therapies : the CoPPS Statement
- 2023
-
Ingår i: BMJ. British Medical Journal. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 0959-8146 .- 0959-535X. ; 381, s. e072108-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Control interventions (often called "sham," "placebo," or "attention controls") are essential for studying the efficacy or mechanism of physical, psychological, and self-management interventions in clinical trials. This article presents core recommendations for designing, conducting, and reporting control interventions to establish a quality standard in non-pharmacological intervention research. A framework of additional considerations supports researchers' decision making in this context. We also provide a reporting checklist for control interventions to enhance research transparency, usefulness, and rigour.
|
|
3. |
- Jolak, Rodi, et al.
(författare)
-
Software engineering whispers: The effect of textual vs. graphical software design descriptions on software design communication
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Empirical Software Engineering. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1382-3256 .- 1573-7616. ; 25, s. 4427-4471
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Context Software engineering is a social and collaborative activity. Communicating and sharing knowledge between software developers requires much effort. Hence, the quality of communication plays an important role in influencing project success. To better understand the effect of communication on project success, more in-depth empirical studies investigating this phenomenon are needed. Objective We investigate the effect of using a graphical versus textual design description on co-located software design communication. Method Therefore, we conducted a family of experiments involving a mix of 240 software engineering students from four universities. We examined how different design representations (i.e., graphical vs. textual) affect the ability toExplain,Understand,Recall, andActively Communicateknowledge. Results We found that the graphical design description is better than the textual in promotingActive Discussionbetween developers and improving theRecallof design details. Furthermore, compared to its unaltered version, a well-organized and motivated textual design description-that is used for the same amount of time-enhances the recall of design details and increases the amount of active discussions at the cost of reducing the perceived quality of explaining.
|
|
4. |
|
|