| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Baumbach, Linda, et al.
(författare)
-
Association between received treatment elements and satisfaction with care for patients with knee osteoarthritis seen in general practice in Denmark
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. - : Taylor & Francis. - 0281-3432 .- 1502-7724. ; 39:2, s. 257-264
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: While education, exercise, and weight reduction when indicated, are recommended first-line treatments for knee osteoarthritis patients, they remain poorly implemented in favour of pain killer treatment, imaging and referral to surgery. A reason could be that patients are more satisfied with receiving these adjunctive treatment elements. This study aimed to investigate the associations between the received elements of care and the patient's satisfaction with the care for knee osteoarthritis in general practice.Design: Cross-sectional study.Setting: A Danish general practice.Subjects: All consecutive patients >= 30 years of age who consulted the general practitioner (GP) with chronic knee complaints during 18 months and who replied to a mailed questionnaire (n = 136).Main outcome measures: The questionnaire addressed patient's knee-related quality of life, and overall satisfaction with care, as well as reception of seven types of information, which are known quality indicators. Information on reception of adjunctive treatment elements was obtained from electronic medical records.Results: Patient satisfaction (versus neutrality/dissatisfaction) was positively associated with reception of information on: physical activity and exercise (relative risks [RR] 1.38, 95% bootstrap percentile interval [BPI] 1.02-4.33), and the relationship between weight and osteoarthritis (1.38, 1.01-4.41). No significant associations were found for the five remaining types of information and all the adjunctive treatment elements.Conclusion: Providing information as education to patients with knee osteoarthritis as part of the treatment is positively associated with satisfaction with care.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Baumbach, Linda, et al.
(författare)
-
Changes in received quality of care for knee osteoarthritis after a multicomponent intervention in a general practice in Denmark
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Health Science Reports. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 2398-8835. ; 4:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: First-line treatment for patients with knee osteoarthritis should ideally prescribe patient education, exercise, and if needed, weight loss. In practice, however, adjunctive treatments, including painkillers and referrals to specialists, are typically introduced before these measures. This study evaluated interventions to sustainably improve general practitioner delivered care for patients with knee osteoarthritis.Design: Comparison of impacts of knee osteoarthritis care during four half-year periods: before, 6, 12, and 18 months after primary intervention based on electronic medical records (EMR) and patient questionnaires.Setting: Danish general practitioners (GPs) treating 6240 patients.Participants: Four GPs, two GP trainees, and six staff members.Interventions: Six pre-planned primary interventions: patient leaflet, GP and staff educational session, knee osteoarthritis consultation, two functional tests monitoring patient function, EMR phrase aiding consultation, and waiting room advertisement and three supportive follow-up interventions.Main outcome measures: Usage of first-line and adjunctive treatment elements, the functional tests, and the EMR phrase.Results: Approximately 50 knee osteoarthritis cases participated in each of the four half-year periods. Primary interventions had only transient effects lasting <12 months on the knee osteoarthritis care. Functional tests and EMR phrases were used predominantly during the first 6 months, where a transient drop in the referral rate to orthopedics was observed. Use of educational elements was moderate and without significant change during follow-up.Conclusion: More routine use of the primary or inclusion of novel increased-adherence interventions is needed to sustainably improve care for knee osteoarthritis patients in Danish general practice.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Larzon, Thomas, 1950-, et al.
(författare)
-
Editor's choice : a randomized controlled trial of the fascia suture technique compared with a suture-mediated closure device for femoral arterial closure after endovascular aortic repair
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : W.B. Saunders Ltd. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 49:2, s. 166-173
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: The aim was to investigate whether the fascia suture technique (FST) can reduce access closure time and procedural costs compared with the Prostar technique (Prostar) in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair and to evaluate the short- and mid-term outcomes of both techniques.Methods: In this two center trial, 100 patients were randomized to access closure by either FST or Prostar between June 2006 and December 2009. The primary endpoint was access closure time. Secondary outcome measures included access related costs and evaluation of the short- and mid-term complications. Evaluation was performed pen- and post-operatively, at discharge, at 30 days and at 6 months follow up.Results: The median access closure time was 12.4 minutes for FST and 19.9 minutes for Prostar (p < .001). Prostar required a 54% greater procedure time than FST, mean ratio 1.54 (95% Cl 1.25-1.90, p < .001) according to regression analysis. Adjusted for operator experience the mean ratio was 1.30 (95% Cl 1.09-1.55, p = .005) and for patient body mass index 1.59 (95% Cl 1.28-1.96, p < .001). The technical failure rate for operators at proficiency level was 5% (2/40) compared with 28% (17/59) for those at the basic level (p = .003). The proficiency level group had a technical failure rate of 4% (1/26) for FST and 7% (1/14) for Prostar, p = 1.00, while corresponding rates for the basic level group were 27% (6/22) for FST and 30% (11/37) for Prostar (p = .84). There was a significant difference in cost in favor. of FST, with a median difference of (sic)800 (95% Cl 710-927, p < .001). Conclusions: In aortic endovascular repair FST is a faster and cheaper technique than the Prostar technique.
|
|
