| 1. |
- Hanna, Catherine R., et al.
(författare)
-
Three Versus Six Months of Adjuvant Doublet Chemotherapy for Patients With Colorectal Cancer : A Multi-Country Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Clinical colorectal cancer. - : Elsevier. - 1533-0028. ; 20:3, s. 236-244
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study widens the transferability of cost-utility results from the SCOT trial showing that administering 3 months of adjuvant, oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is cost-effective and cost saving compared to 6 months from the perspective of all countries recruited to SCOT. The impact on healthcare budgets if the findings are implemented as predicted will amount to savings of at least US$150 million over 5 years. Background: The Short Course Oncology Treatment (SCOT) trial demonstrated non-inferiority, less toxicity, and cost-effectiveness from a UK perspective of 3 versus 6 months of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with colorectal cancer. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of shorter treatment and the budget impact of implementing trial findings from the perspectives of all countries recruited to SCOT: Australia, Denmark, New Zealand, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Patients and Methods: Individual cost-utility analyses were performed from the perspective of each country. Resource, quality of life, and survival estimates from the SCOT trial (N = 6065) were used. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyses were undertaken. Using undiscounted costs from these cost-utility analyses, the impact on country-specific healthcare budgets of implementing the SCOT trial findings was calculated over a 5-year period. The currency used was US dollars (US$), and 2019 was the base year. One-way and scenario sensitivity analysis addressed uncertainty within the budget impact analysis. Results: Three months of treatment were cost saving and cost-effective compared to 6 months from the perspective of all countries. The incremental net monetary benefit per patient ranged from US$8972 (Spain) to US$13,884 (Denmark). The healthcare budget impact over 5 years for the base-case scenario ranged from US$3.6 million (New Zealand) to US$61.4 million (UK) and totaled over US$150 million across all countries. Conclusion: This study has widened the transferability of results from the SCOT trial, showing that shorter treatment is cost-effective from a multi-country perspective. The vast savings from implementation could fully justify the investment in conducting the SCOT trial.
|
|
| 2. |
- Salazar, Ramon, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of ColoPrint risk classification with clinical risk in the prospective PARSC trial
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - Inst Catala Oncol, Early Clin Res Unit, Lhospitalet Barcelona, Spain. Vall dHebron Univ Hosp, Barcelona, Spain. Kantonsspital Baden, Dept Surg, Baden, Switzerland. Akad Univ Hosp, Uppsala, Sweden. Westfries Gasthuis, Hoorn, Netherlands. Inst Canc Montpelier, Dept Pathol, Montpellier, France. Med Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands. Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA. Med Ctr Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands. Med Univ Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Univ Oxford, Dept Oncol, Oxford, England. Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Winston Salem, NC USA. Matsuda Hosp, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan. Acad Teaching Hosp, Linz, Austria. South Orange Cty Surg Med Grp, Laguna Hills, CA USA. Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp NHS FT, Norwich, Norfolk, England. Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China. Long Beach Mem Med Ctr, Long Beach, CA USA. Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Georgetown Univ, Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, Washington, DC USA.. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 32:15
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
