| 1. |
- Kunadian, Vijay, et al.
(författare)
-
Angiographic Outcomes in the PLATO Trial (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes)
- 2013
-
Ingår i: JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS. - : Elsevier BV. - 1936-8798. ; 6:7, s. 671-683
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives The PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) angiographic substudy sought to compare the efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel with respect to angiographic outcomes before and after PCI in the setting of acute coronary syndrome. Background Greater platelet inhibition has been associated with improved angiographic outcomes before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, it was hypothesized that treatment with ticagrelor, which achieves more rapid, higher, and more consistent platelet inhibition, would be associated with improved angiographic outcomes when compared with those of clopidogrel treatment. Methods The angiographic cohort consists of 2,616 patients drawn from the 18,624-patient PLATO trial. Clopidogrel naive or pre-treated patients were randomized to 180 mg of ticagrelor or 300 mg of clopidogrel (75 mg for clopidogrel pre-treated patients). PCI patients were administered, as per treatment group: 1) an additional 90 mg of ticagrelor if >24 h following the initial loading dose; or 2) an optional further 300 mg of clopidogrel or placebo (total 600 mg) prior to PCI. The substudy primary endpoint was the incidence of post-PCI TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) myocardial perfusion grade 3 (TMPG 3) among patients who received a study drug prior to PCI. Results In total, 21.3% of patients were pretreated with clopidogrel prior to randomization. There was a short time interval between randomization and PCI (median: 0.68 [interquartile range (IQR): 0.30 to 2.21] h) among all patients. Post-PCI TMPG 3 was similar between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (47.1% vs. 46.9%; p = 0.96). Likewise, the following pre-PCI outcomes were similar in the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups, respectively: TMPG 3 (30.5% vs. 31.2%), TIMI flow grade 3 (37.1% vs. 39.3%), corrected TIMI frame count (median: 100 vs. 71 frames), TIMI thrombus grade 0 (24.1% vs. 27.6%), minimum lumen diameter (median: 0.3 [IQR: 0.0 to 0.6] vs. 0.3 [IQR: 0.0 to 0.6] mm) and percentage of diameter stenosis (median: 89 [IQR: 78 to 100] vs. 89 [IQR: 77 to 100]). Conclusions Neither coronary flow nor myocardial perfusion, evaluated on coronary angiograms performed before or following PCI procedures within a few hours after the start of oral antiplatelet treatment in the setting of acute coronary syndromes, demonstrated a difference with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. (A Comparison of Ticagrelor [AZD6140] and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [PLATO]; NCT00391872)
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Kohli, Payal, et al.
(författare)
-
Reduction in First and Recurrent Cardiovascular Events with Ticagrelor Compared with Clopidogrel in the PLATO Study
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Circulation. - 0009-7322 .- 1524-4539. ; 127:6, s. 673-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND:We sought to evaluate the effect of potent platelet inhibition following acute coronary syndrome on total (i.e. first and recurrent) occurrences of any of the primary outcome events (e.g. cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) as well as on other ischemic events, such as urgent revascularization, (severe) recurrent ischemia (SRI/RI), transient ischemic attacks (TIA) and arterial thrombotic events (ATE).METHODS AND RESULTS:In the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) study, 18,624 patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes randomly received ticagrelor (N=9333) or clopidogrel (N=9291). Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate time to first event and hazard ratios. Total events were compared using a Poisson regression model and time to second event or death was calculated with the Wei Lin Weissfeld method. Patients randomized to ticagrelor had 1057 total primary endpoint events vs. 1225 for patients on clopidogrel (rate ratio=0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.93, p=0.003). The number of additional events was numerically lower for ticagrelor (189 vs. 205, p=0.40), resulting in a hazard for time to second event/death of 0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.90, p<0.001) and a number needed to treat of 54. For CVD/MI/Stroke/SRI/RI/TIA/ATE, total events were fewer with ticagrelor (2030 vs. 2290, rate ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.95, p<0.001), with fewer recurrent events with ticagrelor (740 vs. 834, p=0.01) and a highly significant concurrent reduction in hazard for time to second event or death of 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.91, p<0.001). Recurrent PLATO major or TIMI major non-CABG bleeding events were infrequent and not different between the two therapies (p=0.96 and 0.38, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: In PLATO, treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel resulted in a reduction in total events, including first and subsequent recurrent cardiovascular events, when compared to clopidogrel. These types of analyses demonstrate an even greater absolute benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel than previously reported.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00391872.
|
|
| 4. |
- Åkerblom, Axel, 1977-, et al.
(författare)
-
Cystatin C- and Creatinine-based Estimates of Renal Function and Their Value for Risk Prediction in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome : Results from the PLATelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) Study
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Clinical Chemistry. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0009-9147 .- 1530-8561. ; 59:9, s. 1369-1375
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) independently predicts cardiovascular (CV) death or myocardial infarction (MI), and can be estimated by creatinine and cystatin C concentrations. We evaluated two different cystatin C assays, alone or combined with creatinine, in patients with acute coronary syndromes.Methods: Plasma cystatin C, measured with assays from Gentian and Roche, and serum creatinine was analyzed in 16279 patients from the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes trial. Pearson’s correlation and agreement (Bland–Altman) between methods was evaluated. Prognostic value in relation to CV death or MI during one year of follow up was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression analysis including clinical variables and biomarkers, c-statistics and relative Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI).Results: Median cystatin C concentrations (interquartile intervals) were 0.83 (0.68 - 1.01) mg/L (Gentian) and 0.94 (0.80 - 1.14) mg/L (Roche). Overall correlation was 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.85-0.86). The level of agreement was ±0.39mg/L (±2 standard deviations) (n=16279).The area under curve (AUC) in the multivariable risk prediction model with cystatin C (Gentian, Roche) or Chronic Kidney Disease - Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) added was 0.6914, 0.6913 and 0.6932. Corresponding relative IDIs were 2.96%, 3.86% and 4.68%, respectively (n=13050). Addition of eGFR by the combined creatinine-cystatin C equation yielded AUC of 0.6923(Gentian) and 0.6924(Roche) with relative IDIs of 3.54% and 3.24% respectively.Conclusions: Despite differences in cystatin C concentrations, overall correlation between the Gentian and Roche assays was good while agreement was moderate. The combined creatinine-cystatin C equation did not outperform risk prediction compared to CKD-EPI.
|
|
