SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(TURNER G) ;lar1:(slu)"

Search: WFRF:(TURNER G) > Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

  • Result 1-6 of 6
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  • Klionsky, Daniel J., et al. (author)
  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
  • 2012
  • In: Autophagy. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1554-8635 .- 1554-8627. ; 8:4, s. 445-544
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
  •  
4.
  • Hudson, Lawrence N, et al. (author)
  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project
  • 2017
  • In: Ecology and Evolution. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 2045-7758. ; 7:1, s. 145-188
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The PREDICTS project-Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems (www.predicts.org.uk)-has collated from published studies a large, reasonably representative database of comparable samples of biodiversity from multiple sites that differ in the nature or intensity of human impacts relating to land use. We have used this evidence base to develop global and regional statistical models of how local biodiversity responds to these measures. We describe and make freely available this 2016 release of the database, containing more than 3.2 million records sampled at over 26,000 locations and representing over 47,000 species. We outline how the database can help in answering a range of questions in ecology and conservation biology. To our knowledge, this is the largest and most geographically and taxonomically representative database of spatial comparisons of biodiversity that has been collated to date; it will be useful to researchers and international efforts wishing to model and understand the global status of biodiversity.
  •  
5.
  • Hudson, Lawrence N., et al. (author)
  • The PREDICTS database : a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts
  • 2014
  • In: Ecology and Evolution. - : Wiley. - 2045-7758. ; 4:24, s. 4701-4735
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Biodiversity continues to decline in the face of increasing anthropogenic pressures such as habitat destruction, exploitation, pollution and introduction of alien species. Existing global databases of species' threat status or population time series are dominated by charismatic species. The collation of datasets with broad taxonomic and biogeographic extents, and that support computation of a range of biodiversity indicators, is necessary to enable better understanding of historical declines and to project - and avert - future declines. We describe and assess a new database of more than 1.6 million samples from 78 countries representing over 28,000 species, collated from existing spatial comparisons of local-scale biodiversity exposed to different intensities and types of anthropogenic pressures, from terrestrial sites around the world. The database contains measurements taken in 208 (of 814) ecoregions, 13 (of 14) biomes, 25 (of 35) biodiversity hotspots and 16 (of 17) megadiverse countries. The database contains more than 1% of the total number of all species described, and more than 1% of the described species within many taxonomic groups - including flowering plants, gymnosperms, birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, beetles, lepidopterans and hymenopterans. The dataset, which is still being added to, is therefore already considerably larger and more representative than those used by previous quantitative models of biodiversity trends and responses. The database is being assembled as part of the PREDICTS project (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems - ). We make site-level summary data available alongside this article. The full database will be publicly available in 2015.
  •  
6.
  • Carneiro, Miguel, et al. (author)
  • Rabbit genome analysis reveals a polygenic basis for phenotypic change during domestication
  • 2014
  • In: Science. - : American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). - 0036-8075 .- 1095-9203. ; 345:6200, s. 1074-1079
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The genetic changes underlying the initial steps of animal domestication are still poorly understood. We generated a high-quality reference genome for the rabbit and compared it to resequencing data from populations of wild and domestic rabbits. We identified more than 100 selective sweeps specific to domestic rabbits but only a relatively small number of fixed (or nearly fixed) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for derived alleles. SNPs with marked allele frequency differences between wild and domestic rabbits were enriched for conserved noncoding sites. Enrichment analyses suggest that genes affecting brain and neuronal development have often been targeted during domestication. We propose that because of a truly complex genetic background, tame behavior in rabbits and other domestic animals evolved by shifts in allele frequencies at many loci, rather than by critical changes at only a few domestication loci.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-6 of 6
Type of publication
journal article (5)
research review (1)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (6)
Author/Editor
Bozhkov, Peter (3)
Hylander, Kristoffer (2)
Wang, Mei (2)
Abrahamczyk, Stefan (2)
Kominami, Eiki (2)
Jonsell, Mats (2)
show more...
Brunet, Jörg (2)
Kolb, Annette (2)
Bonaldo, Paolo (2)
Minucci, Saverio (2)
Sáfián, Szabolcs (2)
De Milito, Angelo (2)
Kågedal, Katarina (2)
Liu, Wei (2)
Clarke, Robert (2)
Jung, Martin (2)
Kumar, Ashok (2)
Berg, Åke (2)
Brest, Patrick (2)
Simon, Hans-Uwe (2)
Mograbi, Baharia (2)
Melino, Gerry (2)
Albert, Matthew L (2)
Entling, Martin H. (2)
Goulson, Dave (2)
Herzog, Felix (2)
Knop, Eva (2)
Tscharntke, Teja (2)
Aizen, Marcelo A. (2)
Petanidou, Theodora (2)
Stout, Jane C. (2)
Woodcock, Ben A. (2)
Poveda, Katja (2)
Lopez-Otin, Carlos (2)
Liu, Bo (2)
Batáry, Péter (2)
Ghavami, Saeid (2)
Harris, James (2)
Edenius, Lars (2)
Jakobsson, J. (2)
Schweiger, Oliver (2)
Baeten, Lander (2)
Zhang, Hong (2)
Zorzano, Antonio (2)
Petersen, Morten (2)
Slade, Eleanor M. (2)
Mikusinski, Grzegorz (2)
Felton, Annika (2)
Samnegård, Ulrika (2)
Barlow, Jos (2)
show less...
University
Umeå University (4)
Stockholm University (4)
Linköping University (3)
Karolinska Institutet (3)
show more...
University of Gothenburg (1)
Uppsala University (1)
Linnaeus University (1)
show less...
Language
English (6)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Natural sciences (6)
Medical and Health Sciences (3)
Agricultural Sciences (1)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view