| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Bill-Axelson, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer-29-Year Follow-up
- 2018
-
Ingår i: New England Journal of Medicine. - : Massachussetts Medical Society. - 0028-4793 .- 1533-4406. ; 379:24, s. 2319-2329
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND Radical prostatectomy reduces mortality among men with clinically detected localized prostate cancer, but evidence from randomized trials with long-term followup is sparse. METHODS We randomly assigned 695 men with localized prostate cancer to watchful waiting or radical prostatectomy from October 1989 through February 1999 and collected follow-up data through 2017. Cumulative incidence and relative risks with 95% confidence intervals for death from any cause, death from prostate cancer, and metastasis were estimated in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, and numbers of years of life gained were estimated. We evaluated the prognostic value of histopathological measures with a Cox proportional-hazards model. RESULTS By December 31, 2017, a total of 261 of the 347 men in the radical-prostatectomy group and 292 of the 348 men in the watchful-waiting group had died; 71 deaths in the radical-prostatectomy group and 110 in the watchful-waiting group were due to prostate cancer (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.74; P<0.001; absolute difference in risk, 11.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.2 to 18.2). The number needed to treat to avert one death from any cause was 8.4. At 23 years, a mean of 2.9 extra years of life were gained with radical prostatectomy. Among the men who underwent radical prostatectomy, extracapsular extension was associated with a risk of death from prostate cancer that was 5 times as high as that among men without extracapsular extension, and a Gleason score higher than 7 was associated with a risk that was 10 times as high as that with a score of 6 or lower (scores range from 2 to 10, with higher scores indicating more aggressive cancer). CONCLUSIONS Men with clinically detected, localized prostate cancer and a long life expectancy benefited from radical prostatectomy, with a mean of 2.9 years of life gained. A high Gleason score and the presence of extracapsular extension in the radical prostatectomy specimens were highly predictive of death from prostate cancer.
|
|
| 3. |
- Tammela, T L, et al.
(författare)
-
An Intraprostatic Modified Release Formulation of Antiandrogen 2-Hydroxyflutamide for Localized Prostate Cancer
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Journal of Urology. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0022-5347 .- 1527-3792. ; 198:6, s. 1333-1339
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: To investigate tolerability, safety and antitumor effects of a novel intra-prostatic depot formulation of antiandrogen 2-hydroxyflutamide (2-HOF in NanoZolid(®)) in men with localized prostate cancer (PCa).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two clinical trials, LPC-002 and LPC-003, were conducted on a total of 47 men. The formulation was injected transrectally into the prostate with ultrasound guidance. In LPC-002 the effects on prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate volume (PV) were measured over 6 months on 24 patients. In LPC-003, antitumor effects were evaluated with histopathology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including spectroscopy (MRS) during 6 or 8 weeks on 23 patients. In both studies, testosterone and 2-HOF in plasma were measured, as well as quality-of-life parameters.RESULTS: In LPC-002 (mean dose 690 mg) a reduction in PSA and PV was observed. The nadir values for PSA and PV were on average 24.9 % and 14.0 % below baseline, respectively. When increasing the dose in LPC-003 (920 mg and 1740 mg), the average PSA dropped 16 % and 23 %, respectively, after 6 and 8 weeks. MRI/MRS showed morphological changes and a global drop in metabolite concentrations following treatment indicating an antitumor response. The injections did not result in hormone related side effects. In total, three serious adverse events were reported, all resolved by oral antibiotic treatment.CONCLUSIONS: The intraprostatic injections of 2-HOF depot formulations indicated anti-tumor effects and proved safe and tolerable. However, for better anti-cancer effects higher doses and better dose distribution are suggested.
|
|
