| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Cooray, C, et al.
(författare)
-
Are you suffering from a large arterial occlusion? Please raise your arm!
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Stroke and vascular neurology. - : BMJ. - 2059-8696 .- 2059-8688. ; 3:4, s. 215-221
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Triage tools to identify candidates for thrombectomy are of utmost importance in acute stroke. No prognostic tool has yet gained any widespread use. We compared the predictive value of various models based on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) subitems, ranging from simple to more complex models, for predicting large artery occlusion (LAO) in anterior circulation stroke.MethodsPatients registered in the SITS international Stroke Register with available NIHSS and radiological arterial occlusion data were analysed. We compared 2042 patients harbouring an LAO with 2881 patients having no/distal occlusions. Using binary logistic regression, we developed models ranging from simple 1 NIHSS-subitem to full NIHSS-subitems models. Sensitivities and specificities of the models for predicting LAO were examined.ResultsThe model with highest predictive value included all NIHSS subitems for predicting LAO (area under the curve (AUC) 0.77), yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 69% and 76%, respectively. The second most predictive model (AUC 0.76) included 4-NIHSS-subitems (level of consciousness commands, gaze, facial and arm motor function) yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 67% and 75%, respectively. The simplest model included only deficits in arm motor-function (AUC 0.72) for predicting LAO, yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 67% and 72%, respectively.ConclusionsAlthough increasingly more complex models yield a higher discriminative performance for predicting LAO, differences between models are not large. Assessing grade of arm dysfunction along with an established stroke-diagnosis model may serve as a surrogate measure of arterial occlusion-status, thereby assisting in triage decisions.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Karlinski, M, et al.
(författare)
-
Intravenous alteplase in ischemic stroke patients not fully adhering to the current drug license in Central and Eastern Europe
- 2012
-
Ingår i: International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society. - : SAGE Publications. - 1747-4949. ; 7:8, s. 615-622
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The current European license for alteplase in acute ischemic stroke excludes from treatment large groups of patients. Nevertheless, in everyday practice, many patients receive off-label thrombolysis at the physician's discretion. Aim Our aim was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of intravenous alteplase in patients not fully adhering to the drug license compared with those treated strictly according to the license in Central and Eastern Europe. Methods We analyzed the data contributed to Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke registry from nine countries between February 2003 and February 2010. Statistical analysis included multivariate logistic regression. Results Of 5594 consecutive patients, 1919 patients (34·3%) not fully adhered to the license. The most frequent deviations were: time-to-treatment >3 h (13·1%), use of intravenous antihypertensives (8·3%), age >80 years (7·3%), oral anticoagulation (4·2%), a previous stroke with concomitant diabetes (3·9%), and previous stroke <three-months (2·7%). The off-label group showed a significantly higher rate of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, which was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis. License nonadherence significantly increased the risk of death or dependency (odds ratio 1·26; 95% confidence interval: 1·08–1·48), with a trend for increased mortality (odds ratio 1·17; 95% confidence interval: 0·97–1·42). Isolated time-to-treatment >3 h was an independent predictor of unfavorable outcome (odds ratio 1·32; 95% confidence interval: 1·01–1·71). Conclusion Our findings show that patients not fully adhering to the European license are not at increased risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage but achieve less favorable outcome. Some contraindications appear more redundant than others. However, the final conclusions about safety and effectiveness should be based on the results of ongoing randomized trials.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
