| 1. |
- Ben Avraham, Binyamin, et al.
(author)
-
HFA of the ESC Position paper on the management of LVAD supported patients for the non LVAD specialist healthcare provider : Part 1: Introduction and at the non-hospital settings in the community
- 2021
-
In: ESC Heart Failure. - : Wiley. - 2055-5822. ; 8:6, s. 4394-4408
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The accepted use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology as a good alternative for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure together with the improved survival of the LVAD-supported patients on the device and the scarcity of donor hearts has significantly increased the population of LVAD-supported patients. The expected and non-expected device-related and patient-device interaction complications impose a significant burden on the medical system exceeding the capacity of the LVAD implanting centres. The ageing of the LVAD-supported patients, mainly those supported with the destination therapy indication, increases the risk for those patients to experience comorbidities common in the older population. The probability of an LVAD-supported patient presenting with medical emergency to a local emergency department, internal, or surgical ward of a non-LVAD implanting centre is increasing. The purpose of this trilogy is to supply the immediate tools needed by the non-LVAD specialized physician: ambulance clinicians, emergency ward physicians, general cardiologists, internists, anaesthesiologists, and surgeons, to comply with the medical needs of this fast-growing population of LVAD-supported patients. The different issues discussed will follow the patients pathway from the ambulance to the emergency department and from the emergency department to the internal or surgical wards and eventually to the discharge home from the hospital back to the general practitioner. In this first part of the trilogy on the management of LVAD-supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider, after the introduction on the assist devices technology in general, definitions and structured approach to the assessment of the LVAD-supported patient in the ambulance and emergency department is presented including cardiopulmonary resuscitation for LVAD-supported patients.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ben Gal, Tuvia, et al.
(author)
-
Guidance on the management of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider: executive summary
- 2021
-
In: European Journal of Heart Failure. - : Wiley-Blackwell. - 1388-9842 .- 1879-0844. ; 23:10, s. 1597-1609
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The accepted use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology as a good alternative for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure together with the improved survival of patients on the device and the scarcity of donor hearts has significantly increased the population of LVAD supported patients. Device-related, and patient-device interaction complications impose a significant burden on the medical system exceeding the capacity of LVAD implanting centres. The probability of an LVAD supported patient presenting with medical emergency to a local ambulance team, emergency department medical team and internal or surgical wards in a non-LVAD implanting centre is increasing. The purpose of this paper is to supply the immediate tools needed by the non-LVAD specialized physician - ambulance clinicians, emergency ward physicians, general cardiologists, and internists - to comply with the medical needs of this fast-growing population of LVAD supported patients. The different issues discussed will follow the patients pathway from the ambulance to the emergency department, and from the emergency department to the internal or surgical wards and eventually back to the general practitioner.
|
|
| 3. |
- Gustafsson, Finn, et al.
(author)
-
HFA of the ESC position paper on the management of LVAD-supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider : Part 3: at the hospital and discharge
- 2021
-
In: ESC Heart Failure. - : Wiley Periodicals Inc. - 2055-5822. ; 8:6, s. 4425-4443
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The growing population of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-supported patients increases the probability of an LVAD- supported patient hospitalized in the internal or surgical wards with certain expected device related, and patient-device interaction complication as well as with any other comorbidities requiring hospitalization. In this third part of the trilogy on the management of LVAD-supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider, definitions and structured approach to the hospitalized LVAD-supported patient are presented including blood pressure assessment, medical therapy of the LVAD supported patient, and challenges related to anaesthesia and non-cardiac surgical interventions. Finally, important aspects to consider when discharging an LVAD patient home and palliative and end-of-life approaches are described.
|
|
| 4. |
- Milicic, Davor, et al.
(author)
-
Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology position paper on the management of left ventricular assist device-supported patients for the non-left ventricular assist device specialist healthcare provider : Part 2: at the emergency department
- 2021
-
In: ESC Heart Failure. - : Wiley. - 2055-5822. ; 8:6, s. 4409-4424
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The improvement in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology and scarcity of donor hearts have increased dramatically the population of the LVAD-supported patients and the probability of those patients to present to the emergency department with expected and non-expected device-related and patient-device interaction complications. The ageing of the LVAD-supported patients, mainly those supported with the destination therapy indication, increases the risk for those patients to suffer from other co-morbidities common in the older population. In this second part of the trilogy on the management of LVAD-supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider, definitions and structured approach to the LVAD-supported patient presenting to the emergency department with bleeding, neurological event, pump thrombosis, chest pain, syncope, and other events are presented. The very challenging issue of declaring death in an LVAD-supported patient, as the circulation is artificially preserved by the device despite no other signs of life, is also discussed in detail.
|
|
| 5. |
- Providencia, Rui, et al.
(author)
-
Usefulness of a clinical risk score to predict the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
- 2018
-
In: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0167-5273. ; 260, s. 82-87
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Almost 1/3 of heart failure patients fail to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). A simple clinical score to predict who these patients are at the moment of referral or at time of implant may be of importance for early optimization of their management. Methods: Observational study. A risk score was derived from factors associated to CRT response. The derivation cohort was composed of 1301 patients implanted with a CRT defibrillator in a multi-center French cohort-study. External validation of this score and assessment of its association with CRT response and all-cause mortality and/or heart transplant was performed in 1959 CRT patients implanted in 4 high-volume European centers. Results: Independent predictors of CRT response in the derivation cohort were: female gender (OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.26–3.45), NYHA class ≤ III (OR = 2.71, 95% CI 1.63–4.52), left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 25% (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.27–2.41), QRS duration ≥ 150 ms (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.25–2.30) and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 mL/min (OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.48–2.72). Each was assigned 1 point. External validation showed good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test-P = 0.95), accuracy (Brier score = 0.19) and discrimination (c-statistic = 0.67), with CRT response increasing progressively from 37.5% in patients with a score of 0 to 91.9% among those with score of 5 (Gamma for trend = 0.44, P < 0.001). Similar results were observed regarding all-cause mortality or heart transplant. Conclusion: The ScREEN score (Sex category, Renal function, ECG/QRS width, Ejection fraction and NYHA class) is composed of widely validated, easy to obtain predictors of CRT response, and predicts CRT response and overall mortality. It should be helpful in facilitating early consideration of alternative therapies for predicted non-responders to CRT therapy.
|
|
