| 1. |
- Isenberg, D., et al.
(författare)
-
Study of Flare Assessment in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Based on Paper Patients
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Arthritis Care and Research. - : Wiley. - 2151-464X .- 2151-4658. ; 70:1, s. 98-103
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To determine the level of agreement of disease flare severity (distinguishing severe, moderate, and mild flare and persistent disease activity) in a large paper-patient exercise involving 988 individual cases of systemic lupus erythematosus. Methods: A total of 988 individual lupus case histories were assessed by 3 individual physicians. Complete agreement about the degree of flare (or persistent disease activity) was obtained in 451 cases (46%), and these provided the reference standard for the second part of the study. This component used 3 flare activity instruments (the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group [BILAG] 2004, Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment [SELENA] flare index [SFI] and the revised SELENA flare index [rSFI]). The 451 patient case histories were distributed to 18 pairs of physicians, carefully randomized in a manner designed to ensure a fair case mix and equal distribution of flare according to severity. Results: The 3-physician assessment of flare matched the level of flare using the 3 indices, with 67% for BILAG 2004, 72% for SFI, and 70% for rSFI. The corresponding weighted kappa coefficients for each instrument were 0.82, 0.59, and 0.74, respectively. We undertook a detailed analysis of the discrepant cases and several factors emerged, including a tendency to score moderate flares as severe and persistent activity as flare, especially when the SFI and rSFI instruments were used. Overscoring was also driven by scoring treatment change as flare, even if there were no new or worsening clinical features. Conclusion: Given the complexity of assessing lupus flare, we were encouraged by the overall results reported. However, the problem of capturing lupus flare accurately is not completely solved.
|
|
| 2. |
- Urowitz, M. B., et al.
(författare)
-
Cardiovascular events prior to or early after diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus in the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics cohort
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Lupus Science and Medicine. - : BMJ. - 2053-8790. ; 3:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective To describe the frequency of myocardial infarction (MI) prior to the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and within the first 2 years of follow-up. Methods The systemic lupus international collaborating clinics (SLICC) atherosclerosis inception cohort enters patients within 15 months of SLE diagnosis. MIs were reported and attributed on a specialised vascular event form. MIs were confirmed by one or more of the following: abnormal ECG, typical or atypical symptoms with ECG abnormalities and elevated enzymes (≥2 times upper limit of normal), or abnormal stress test, echocardiogram, nuclear scan or angiogram. Descriptive statistics were used. Results 31 of 1848 patients who entered the cohort had an MI. Of those, 23 patients had an MI prior to SLE diagnosis or within the first 2 years of disease. Of the 23 patients studied, 60.9% were female, 78.3% were Caucasian, 8.7% black, 8.7% Hispanic and 4.3% other. The mean age at SLE diagnosis was 52.5±15.0 years. Of the 23 MIs that occurred, 16 MIs occurred at a mean of 6.1±7.0 years prior to diagnosis and 7 occurred within the first 2 years of follow-up. Risk factors associated with early MI in univariate analysis are male sex, Caucasian, older age at diagnosis, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, family history of MI and smoking. In multivariate analysis only age (OR=1.06 95% CI 1.03 to 1.09), hypertension (OR=5.01, 95% CI 1.38 to 18.23), hypercholesterolaemia (OR=4.43, 95% CI 1.51 to 12.99) and smoking (OR=7.50, 95% CI 2.38 to 23.57) remained significant risk factors. Conclusions In some patients with lupus, MI may develop even before the diagnosis of SLE or shortly thereafter, suggesting that there may be a link between autoimmune inflammation and atherosclerosis.
|
|
| 3. |
- Hanly, JG, et al.
(författare)
-
Prospective analysis of neuropsychiatric events in an international disease inception cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 69:3, s. 529-535
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To determine the frequency, accrual, attribution and outcome of neuropsychiatric (NP) events and impact on quality of life over 3 years in a large inception cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsThe study was conducted by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics. Patients were enrolled within 15 months of SLE diagnosis. NP events were identified using the American College of Rheumatology case definitions, and decision rules were derived to determine the proportion of NP disease attributable to SLE. The outcome of NP events was recorded and patient-perceived impact determined by the SF-36.Results1206 patients (89.6% female) with a mean (±SD) age of 34.5±13.2 years were included in the study. The mean disease duration at enrolment was 5.4±4.2 months. Over a mean follow-up of 1.9±1.2 years, 486/1206 (40.3%) patients had ≥1 NP events, which were attributed to SLE in 13.0–23.6% of patients using two a priori decision rules. The frequency of individual NP events varied from 47.1% (headache) to 0% (myasthenia gravis). The outcome was significantly better for those NP events attributed to SLE, especially if they occurred within 1.5 years of the diagnosis of SLE. Patients with NP events, regardless of attribution, had significantly lower summary scores for both mental and physical health over the study.ConclusionsNP events in patients with SLE are of variable frequency, most commonly present early in the disease course and adversely impact patients' quality of life over time. Events attributed to non-SLE causes are more common than those due to SLE, although the latter have a more favourable outcome.
|
|
| 4. |
- Hanly, JG, et al.
(författare)
-
SF-36 summary and subscale scores are reliable outcomes of neuropsychiatric events in systemic lupus erythematosus
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 70:6, s. 961-967
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To examine change in health-related quality of life in association with clinical outcomes of neuropsychiatric events in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsAn international study evaluated newly diagnosed SLE patients for neuropsychiatric events attributed to SLE and non-SLE causes. The outcome of events was determined by a physician-completed seven-point scale and compared with patient-completed Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaires. Statistical analysis used linear mixed-effects regression models with patient-specific random effects.Results274 patients (92% female; 68% Caucasian), from a cohort of 1400, had one or more neuropsychiatric event in which the interval between assessments was 12.3±2 months. The overall difference in change between visits in mental component summary (MCS) scores of the SF-36 was significant (p<0.0001) following adjustments for gender, ethnicity, centre and previous score. A consistent improvement in neuropsychiatric status (N=295) was associated with an increase in the mean (SD) adjusted MCS score of 3.66 (0.89) in SF-36 scores. Between paired visits when the neuropsychiatric status consistently deteriorated (N=30), the adjusted MCS score decreased by 4.00 (1.96). For the physical component summary scores the corresponding changes were +1.73 (0.71) and −0.62 (1.58) (p<0.05), respectively. Changes in SF-36 subscales were in the same direction (p<0.05; with the exception of role physical). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings. Adjustment for age, education, medications, SLE disease activity, organ damage, disease duration, attribution and characteristics of neuropsychiatric events did not substantially alter the results.ConclusionChanges in SF-36 summary and subscale scores, in particular those related to mental health, are strongly associated with the clinical outcome of neuropsychiatric events in SLE patients.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Werth, V, et al.
(författare)
-
BIIB059, A HUMANIZED MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY TARGETING BDCA2 ON PLASMACYTOID DENDRITIC CELLS (PDC), SHOWS DOSE-RELATED EFFICACY IN THE PHASE 2 LILAC STUDY IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH ACTIVE CUTANEOUS LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (CLE)
- 2020
-
Ingår i: ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 79, s. 120-121
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- CLE represents an unmet medical need with no approved therapy. BIIB059, a humanized monoclonal antibody, binds to BDCA2 and inhibits pro-inflammatory mediators production, including type I interferons. BIIB059 was evaluated in Phase 1 studiesNCT02106897andNCT03224793. LILAC is a 2-part Phase 2 study: Part A enrolled SLE pts; Part B enrolled pts with active CLE (NCT02847598).Objectives:Evaluate efficacy and safety of BIIB059 in pts enrolled in Part B at Week 16, end of treatment (EOT) period.Methods:Pts with active CLE, SCLE and/or CCLE and adjudicated Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index – Activity (CLASI-A) ≥8 were enrolled and randomized to receive either BIIB059 (50, 150 or 450 mg) or placebo (PBO) s.c. Q4W. Primary endpoint was dose response defined by % change in CLASI-A score from baseline (BL) to Week 16. Secondary endpoints included CLASI-50 response rate and ≥ 7-point reduction in CLASI-A score from baseline to EOT. Adverse events and serious adverse events were recorded throughout the study.Results:132 pts with active CLE were randomized. The study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating a dose response (p= 0.0005) and a statistically significant difference in % change from BL in CLASI-A score in BIIB059-treated pts vs PBO. Table 1 and Table 2 summarize efficacy and safety results, respectively.Table 1.Efficacy EndpointsBIIB059PBO50 mg150 mg450 mgLS Mean (SE)LS Mean (SE)LSMD*from PBO (95% CI)P val.LS Mean(SE)LSMD*from PBO (95% CI)P val.LS Mean(SE)LSMD*from PBO (95% CI)P val.Primary EndpointCLASI-A % change from BL-14.5 (6.4)-40.8 (7.5)-26.3 (-45.7; -7.0)0.008-47.9 (7.4)-33.5 (-52.7; -14.3)0.001-43.5 (5.5)-28.0 (-44.5; -11.5)0.001Secondary Endpointsn(%)n(%)LSMD*from PBO (95% CI)P val.n(%)LSMD*from PBO (95% CI)P val.n(%)LSMD*from PBO (95% CI)P val.Prop. of participants achieving CLASI 507/32 (21.9%)10/26 (38.5%)15.8% (-7; 39)0.13311/25 (44.0%)21 (-2.8; 45)0.05920/43 (46.5%)23 (3; 44)0.024Prop. of participants achieving a ≥7-point CLASI-A reduction from BL7/32 (21.9%)9/26 (34.6%)12.3 (-11.3; 35.8)0.22812/25 (48.0%)22.2 (-2.0; 46.3)0.05518/43 (41.8%)16.8 (-6.7; 40.4)0.048*LSMD=LS Mean DifferencePBOBIIB059OVERALLN=3350 mgN=26150 mgN=25450 mgN=48PooledN=99N=132Any Event, n(%)18 (54.5)17 (65.4)12 (48)33 (68.8)62 (62.6)80 (60.6)SeverityMild11 (33.3)11 (42.3)8 (32.0)19 (39.6)38 (38.4)49 (37.1)Moderate4 (12.1)6 (23.1)3 (12.0)12 (25.0)21 (21.2)25 (18.9)Severe3 (9.1)01 (4.0)2 (4.2)3 (3.0)6 (4.5)Related events6 (18.2)9 (34.6)4 (16.0)16 (33.3)29 (29.3)35 (26.5)Serious events2 (6.1)03 (12.0)2 (4.2)5 (5.1)7 (5.3)Related serious events1 (3.0)01 (4.0)1 (2.1)2 (2.0)3 (2.3)Events leading to drug withdrawal01 (3.8)1 (4.0)1 (2.1)3 (3.0)3 (2.3)Events leading to study withdrawal0001 (2.1)1 (1.0)1 (0.8)Fatal events000000Conclusion:BIIB059 administration to pts with active CLE resulted in statistically significant dose-related improvement in disease activity vs PBO with no untoward safety signals. Further development of BIIB059 in CLE is warranted.Disclosure of Interests:Victoria Werth Grant/research support from: Biogen, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Viela, Consultant of: Biogen, Gilead, Janssen, Abbvie, GSK, Resolve, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, BMS, Viela, Kyowa Kirin, Richard Furie Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Biogen, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Biogen, Juanita Romero-Diaz Consultant of: Biogen, Sandra Navarra Speakers bureau: Astellas, Novartis, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Abbvie, Kenneth Kalunian Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Lupus Research Alliance, Sanford Consortium, Consultant of: Genentech, Nektar, BMS, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Vielabio, Equillium, Eli Lilly, ILTOO, Abbvie, Amgen, Roche, Gilead, Ronald van Vollenhoven Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Arthrogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Filippa Nyberg Consultant of: Biogen, Benjamin Kaffenberger Grant/research support from: Amgen, Biogen, InflaRx, Veloce Biopharmaceuticals, Dermatology Foundation, Saira Sheikh: None declared, Goran Radunovic: None declared, XIAOBI HUANG Shareholder of: Biogen, Employee of: Biogen, HUA CARROLL Shareholder of: Biogen, Employee of: Biogen, Francois Gaudreault Shareholder of: Biogen, Employee of: Biogen, Adam Meyers Shareholder of: Biogen, Employee of: Biogen, Catherine Barbey Shareholder of: Biogen, Employee of: Biogen, Cristina Musselli Shareholder of: Biogen, Employee of: Biogen, NATHALIE FRANCHIMONT Shareholder of: Biogen, Employee of: Biogen
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
