| 1. |
- Aked, Joseph, et al.
(author)
-
Survival, causes of death and recurrence up to 3 years after stroke : A population-based study
- 2021
-
In: European Journal of Neurology. - : Wiley. - 1351-5101 .- 1468-1331. ; 28:12, s. 4060-4068
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background and purpose: Up-to-date population-based information about long-term survival, causes of death and recurrence after stroke is needed. Methods: Four hundred consecutive individuals in a population-based cohort of first-ever stroke between 2015 and 2016 in Lund, Sweden, were followed up to 3 years regarding (i) survival (Swedish Population Register); (ii) causes of death (Swedish Causes of Death Register); and (iii) stroke recurrence (interview and medical chart review). Index and recurrent ischaemic stroke cases were classified using the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) and Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project; and comorbidities were classified using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Cox regression was used to determine predictors for 3-year mortality. Survival rates were compared with three local studies over a 30-year timespan. Results: Amongst 400 first-ever stroke patients, 265 (66%) survived 3 years post-stroke. Age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.11), stroke severity (HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.08–1.13) and comorbidities (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.22–1.53) were independently related to 3-year mortality. Amongst index ischaemic stroke patients, survival was lowest amongst those with cardio-aortic embolism (51/91; 56%). Cerebrovascular disease (54/135; 40%) and ischaemic heart disease (25/135; 19%) were the most common causes of death. Within 3 years, 30 (8%) had recurrent stroke. Amongst patients with index ischaemic stroke, 16/29 (55%) had a different TOAST pathogenetic mechanism or hemorrhagic stroke upon recurrence. Stroke survival improved between 1983–1985 and 2015–2016 (p = 0.002), but no significant change was observed between 2001–2002 and 2015–2016 (p = 0.48). Conclusions: Stroke survival rates are relatively high, but their improvement over recent decades may be slowing down, possibly due to the composition of the first-ever stroke population. The common occurrence of changed pathogenetic mechanisms between first-ever and recurrent stroke highlights the value of reassessment in recurrent stroke.
|
|
| 2. |
- Jönsson, Ann-Cathrin, et al.
(author)
-
Falls After Stroke : A Follow-up after Ten Years in Lund Stroke Register
- 2021
-
In: Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases. - : Elsevier BV. - 1532-8511 .- 1052-3057. ; 30:6
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: To evaluate incidence of self-reported falls and associated factors in a ten-year perspective after stroke.METHODS: From a population-based cohort of first-ever stroke patients (n = 416) included in the Lund Stroke Register between March 1, 2001, and February 28, 2002, we performed a follow up of all 145 survivors ten years after stroke. We collected data on age, gender, main stroke type, living and housing situation, general health status (question 1 in the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), dizziness, physical activity, Barthel Index, mobility aids, moving ability inside/outside, and health-related quality of life as defined by the EuroQol 3 dimension scale (EQ-5D-3L). Factors that may relate to falls were compared between those who had experienced falls after stroke or not.RESULTS: Ten years after stroke, 49 patients (34 %) reported falls and 96 patients (66 %) reported no falls. Compared to patients with no falls, those who reported falls were older (median age 83.3 years vs 75.6 years; p < 0.001), more often lived alone, were more dependent in daily living, had less physical activity, poorer general health status, more often needed mobility aids, were more often unable to move alone outside, and had poorer health-related quality of life in all items in EQ-5D-3L except pain/discomfort.CONCLUSIONS: Falls had occurred in approximately one third of the participants ten years after the stroke, and were strongly associated with several measures of frailty. Our results indicate that fall prevention should in particular focus on those at high risk of falls.
|
|
