| 1. |
- Heary, Robert F., et al.
(författare)
-
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy : A two decade experience
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine (JSCM). - : Taylor & Francis. - 1079-0268 .- 2045-7723. ; 42:4, s. 407-415
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Context: Cervical myelopathy occurs as a result of compression of the cervical spinal cord. Symptomatology includes, but is not limited to, pain, weakness, paresthesias, or gait/balance difficulties. Objective: To present a two-decade experience with the management of cervical myelopathy. Methods: Literature was reviewed to provide current guidelines for management as well as accompanying clinical presentations. Results: Surgical decompression, if necessary, may be achieved from either an anterior, a posterior, or a combined anterior-posterior (AP) approach. The indications for each approach, as well as the surgical techniques, are described. Conclusion: Several etiologies may lead to cord compression and cervical myelopathy. The best vector of approach with regard to anterior versus posterior surgical intervention is still under investigation. Regardless, management via surgical decompression has been demonstrated repeatedly to improve the CSM patients' quality of life.
|
|
| 2. |
- MacDowall, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy : a randomized controlled trial with 5-year outcomes
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Neurosurgery. - 1547-5654 .- 1547-5646. ; 30:3, s. 323-331
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVEThe method of artificial disc replacement (ADR) has been developed as an alternative treatment to fusion surgery after decompression for cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) with radiculopathy. Preserving the motion of ADR devices aims to prevent immobilization side effects such as adjacent-segment pathology (ASP). However, long-term follow-up evaluations using MRI are needed to investigate if this intent is achieved.METHODSThe authors performed a randomized controlled trial with 153 patients (mean age 47 years) undergoing surgery for cervical radiculopathy. Eighty-three patients received an ADR and 70 patients underwent fusion surgery. Outcomes after 5 years were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) score as the primary outcome; motion preservation and heterotopic ossification by radiography; ASP by MRI; and secondary surgical procedures.RESULTSScores on the NDI were approximately halved in both groups: the mean score after 5 years was 36 (95% confidence interval [CI] 31–41) in the ADR group and 32 (95% CI 27–38) in the fusion group (p = 0.48). There were no other significant differences between the groups in six other patient-related outcome measures. Fifty-four percent of the patients in the ADR group preserved motion at the operated cervical level and 25% of the ADRs were spontaneously fused. Seventeen ADR patients (21%) and 7 fusion patients (10%) underwent secondary surgery (p = 0.11), with 5 patients in each group due to clinical ASP.CONCLUSIONSIn patients with cervical DDD and radiculopathy decompression as well as ADR, surgery did not result in better clinical or radiological outcomes after 5 years compared with decompression and fusion surgery.
|
|
| 3. |
- MacDowall, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
Artificial Disc Replacement versus Fusion in Patients with Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease with radiculopathy : 5-year Outcomes from the National Swedish Spine Register
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Neurosurgery. - 1547-5654 .- 1547-5646. ; 30:2, s. 159-167
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: The long-term efficacy of artificial disc replacement (ADR) surgery compared with fusion after decompression for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy has not previously been investigated in a population-based setting.METHODS: All patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy who were in the national Swedish Spine Registry (Swespine) beginning in January 1, 2006, were eligible for the study. Follow-up information was obtained up to November 15, 2017. The authors compared, using propensity score matching, patients treated with anterior decompression and insertion of an ADR with patients who underwent anterior decompression combined with fusion surgery. The primary outcome was the Neck Disability Index (NDI), a patient-reported function score ranging from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater disability and a minimum clinically important difference of > 15%.RESULTS: A total of 3998 patients (2018: 1980 women/men) met the inclusion criteria, of whom 204 had undergone arthroplasty and 3794 had undergone fusion. After propensity score matching, 185 patients with a mean age of 49.7 years remained in each group. Scores on the NDI were approximately halved in both groups after 5 years, but without a significant mean difference in NDI (3.0%; 95% CI -8.4 to 2.4; p = 0.28) between the groups. There were no differences between the groups in EuroQol-5 Dimensions or in pain scores for the neck and arm.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy, decompression plus ADR surgery did not result in a clinically important difference in outcomes after 5 years, compared with decompression and fusion surgery.
|
|
| 4. |
- Norling, Ulf, et al.
(författare)
-
Prehospital spinal rörelsebegränsning vid trauma
- 2019
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Traumanätverk Sverige samlar yrkesverksamma läkare och sjuksköterskorinom svensk traumavård. Vid sitt möte i Göteborg 1 december 2016 beslutadenätverket att tillsammans med projektet Säker Traumavård ta fram nationellarekommendationer för prehospital spinal rörelsebegränsning av patienter vidtrauma. Yrkesföreningarnas styrelser utsåg undertecknade representanter attmedverka i arbetet. Löf (Landstingens Ömsesidiga Försäkringsbolag) har viaprojektet Säker Traumavård bekostat arbetsgruppens arbetstid och resekostnader.Arbetsgruppen har efter litteratursökning och 5 protokollförda arbetsmötenarbetat fram föreliggande nationella rekommendationer. Samtliga föreningari Säker Traumavård har efter remissrunda juni – september 2018 ställt sigbakom rekommendationerna och det färdiga resultatet har presenterats förTraumanätverk Sverige den 30 nov 2018.Rekommendationerna ska ses som en sammanställning och värdering av idag bästa kända kunskap inom det beskrivna området. Dokumentet har ingenföreskrivande funktion och författarna kan inte i något avseende hållas juridisktansvariga för innehållet.Avsikten är att rekommendationerna ska resultera i ett enhetligt omhändertagandeav traumapatienter, där tekniker för prehospital spinal rörelsebegränsning användsså att de gör nytta för de patienter som behöver det, men inte används för patienteroch i situationer där de inte gör nytta. Syftet med bildmaterialet är att ge exempelpå hur prehospital spinal rörelsebegränsning kan utföras.
|
|
| 5. |
- Tominaga, Hiroyuki, et al.
(författare)
-
Surgical treatment of the severely damaged atlantoaxial joint with C1-C2 facet spacers Three case reports
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Medicine. - : LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. - 0025-7974 .- 1536-5964. ; 98:22
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Rationale: Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS), caused by congenital factors, inflammation such as rheumatoid arthritis, infection, neoplasia, or trauma, is rare and severely erodes and subluxates atlantoaxial (AA) joints. For these patients, surgical reduction, and stabilization are difficult. Surgery, including anterior transoral decompression and posterior fixation, anterior endonasal decompression and fixation, and posterior decompression with AA or occipitocervical fixation, is often the only treatment available. However, there have only been 2 reports of C1-C2 facet spacer use in treating AAS. Here, we report the case histories of 3 patients with severely damaged and subluxated AA joints and symptomatic basilar invagination (BI), malalignment, or C2 root compression. Patient concerns: The cases included 2 women with rheumatoid arthritis and 1 man with spondyloarthropathy secondary to ulcerative colitis. Diagnosis: Radiographic imaging revealed severely damaged and subluxated AA joints. Their symptoms included worsening pain in the neck or occiput with or without myelopathy and neuralgia. Interventions: After realignment with C1-C2 spacers and posterior C1-C2 screw fixation, the patient symptoms were resolved. Outcomes: Of note, 2 of the 3 patients were healed without complications. One patient who underwent secondary revision surgery because of rod breakage and obvious nonunion at C0-C2 was determined to be healed at 1-year follow-up after the revision surgery. Lessons: We confirmed that C1-C2 facet spacers both reduced BI and occipitocervical coronal malalignment as well as releasing C2 root compression. Therefore, surgical restoration and fixation should be a required treatment in this very rare group of patients.
|
|
